Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.00
    0.001841497 = product of:
      0.021177216 = sum of:
        0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012484257 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.001039214 = product of:
      0.01195096 = sum of:
        0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063955644 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.0055553955 = product of:
          0.011110791 = sum of:
            0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011110791 = score(doc=1520,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/181. Vgl. auch: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/viewArticle/181/160. Vgl. auch: http://oro.open.ac.uk/20065/1/Tudhope_JoDI.pdf.
    Source
    Journal of digital information. 1(2001) no.8
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.00
    7.274498E-4 = product of:
      0.008365672 = sum of:
        0.004476895 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004476895 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.0038887768 = product of:
          0.0077775535 = sum of:
            0.0077775535 = weight(_text_:1 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0077775535 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13433999 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997) 0.00
    5.561361E-4 = product of:
      0.012791129 = sum of:
        0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012791129 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Gábor, K.; Zargayouna, H.; Tellier, I.; Buscaldi, D.; Charnois, T.: ¬A typology of semantic relations dedicated to scientific literature analysis (2016) 0.00
    4.4094716E-4 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    Vortrag, "Semantics, Analytics, Visualisation: Enhancing Scholarly Data Workshop co-located with the 25th International World Wide Web Conference April 11, 2016 - Montreal, Canada", Montreal 2016.
  6. Neumann. M.: HAL: Hyperspace Analogue to Language (2012) 0.00
    4.0990516E-4 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    http://spinfowiki.uni-koeln.de/lehre/images/1/15/Referat_HAL.pdf
  7. Wang, Y.-H.; Jhuo, P.-S.: ¬A semantic faceted search with rule-based inference (2009) 0.00
    3.779547E-4 = product of:
      0.008692958 = sum of:
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009 Vol I, IMECS 2009, March 18 - 20, 2009, Hong Kong
  8. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.00
    2.776628E-4 = product of:
      0.006386244 = sum of:
        0.006386244 = product of:
          0.012772488 = sum of:
            0.012772488 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012772488 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
  9. Fowler, R.H.; Wilson, B.A.; Fowler, W.A.L.: Information navigator : an information system using associative networks for display and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Series
    Report NAG9-551, No. 92-1
  10. Smith, D.A.; Shadbolt, N.R.: FacetOntology : expressive descriptions of facets in the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Footnote
    Volltext unter: ..\http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/345363/1/paper.pdf.
  11. Cao, N.; Sun, J.; Lin, Y.-R.; Gotz, D.; Liu, S.; Qu, H.: FacetAtlas : Multifaceted visualization for rich text corpora (2010) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Documents in rich text corpora usually contain multiple facets of information. For example, an article about a specific disease often consists of different facets such as symptom, treatment, cause, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention. Thus, documents may have different relations based on different facets. Powerful search tools have been developed to help users locate lists of individual documents that are most related to specific keywords. However, there is a lack of effective analysis tools that reveal the multifaceted relations of documents within or cross the document clusters. In this paper, we present FacetAtlas, a multifaceted visualization technique for visually analyzing rich text corpora. FacetAtlas combines search technology with advanced visual analytical tools to convey both global and local patterns simultaneously. We describe several unique aspects of FacetAtlas, including (1) node cliques and multifaceted edges, (2) an optimized density map, and (3) automated opacity pattern enhancement for highlighting visual patterns, (4) interactive context switch between facets. In addition, we demonstrate the power of FacetAtlas through a case study that targets patient education in the health care domain. Our evaluation shows the benefits of this work, especially in support of complex multifaceted data analysis.