Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.04
    0.04193744 = product of:
      0.08387488 = sum of:
        0.08387488 = sum of:
          0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009313605 = score(doc=5693,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496453 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049596746 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The process of term selection for query expansion by end-users is discussed within the context of a study of interactive query expansion in a relevance feedback environment. This user study focuses on how users' perceive and understand term relationships, such as hierarchical and associative relationships, in their searches
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
    Type
    a
  2. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.04
    0.036695257 = product of:
      0.07339051 = sum of:
        0.07339051 = sum of:
          0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008149404 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021843962 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04339715 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Type
    a
  3. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.03
    0.03199339 = product of:
      0.06398678 = sum of:
        0.06398678 = sum of:
          0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008065818 = score(doc=2230,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018723397 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03719756 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a deductive data model for concept-based query expansion. It is based on three abstraction levels: the conceptual, linguistic and occurrence levels. Concepts and relationships among them are represented at the conceptual level. The expression level represents natural language expressions for concepts. Each expression has one or more matching models at the occurrence level. Each model specifies the matching of the expression in database indices built in varying ways. The data model supports a concept-based query expansion and formulation tool, the ExpansionTool, for environments providing heterogeneous IR systems. Expansion is controlled by adjustable matching reliability.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
    Type
    a
  4. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.018307384 = product of:
      0.03661477 = sum of:
        0.03661477 = product of:
          0.05492215 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=6958,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Type
    a
  5. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995) 0.02
    0.018307384 = product of:
      0.03661477 = sum of:
        0.03661477 = product of:
          0.05492215 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=2151,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a model of semantic memory that utilizes a high dimensional semantic space constructed from a co-occurrence matrix. This matrix was formed by analyzing a lot) million word corpus. Word vectors were then obtained by extracting rows and columns of this matrix, These vectors were subjected to multidimensional scaling. Words were found to cluster semantically. suggesting that interword distance may be interpretable as a measure of semantic similarity, In attempting to replicate with our simulation the semantic and ...
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
    Type
    a
  6. Talja, S.; Keso, H.; Pietilainen, T.: ¬The production of context in information seeking research : a metatheoretical view (1999) 0.02
    0.01628453 = product of:
      0.03256906 = sum of:
        0.03256906 = product of:
          0.048853584 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 6249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=6249,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6249, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6249)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 6249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=6249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 6249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6249)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.01
    0.012837617 = product of:
      0.025675233 = sum of:
        0.025675233 = product of:
          0.03851285 = sum of:
            0.007514882 = weight(_text_:a in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007514882 = score(doc=5697,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
            0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997967 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The performance of 8 ranking algorithms was evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in ranking terms for query expansion. The evaluation was conducted within an investigation of interactive query expansion and relevance feedback in a real operational environment. Focuses on the identification of algorithms that most effectively take cognizance of user preferences. user choices (i.e. the terms selected by the searchers for the query expansion search) provided the yardstick for the evaluation of the 8 ranking algorithms. This methodology introduces a user oriented approach in evaluating ranking algorithms for query expansion in contrast to the standard, system oriented approaches. Similarities in the performance of the 8 algorithms and the ways these algorithms rank terms were the main focus of this evaluation. The findings demonstrate that the r-lohi, wpq, enim, and porter algorithms have similar performance in bringing good terms to the top of a ranked list of terms for query expansion. However, further evaluation of the algorithms in different (e.g. full text) environments is needed before these results can be generalized beyond the context of the present study
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Type
    a
  8. Schatz, B.R.; Johnson, E.H.; Cochrane, P.A.; Chen, H.: Interactive term suggestion for users of digital libraries : using thesauri and co-occurrence lists for information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.012642393 = product of:
      0.025284786 = sum of:
        0.025284786 = product of:
          0.037927177 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
            0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 6417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031205663 = score(doc=6417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 6417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6417)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Lobin, H.; Witt, A.: Semantic and thematic navigation in electronic encyclopedias (1999) 0.01
    0.010418028 = product of:
      0.020836055 = sum of:
        0.020836055 = product of:
          0.031254083 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=624,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the field of electronic publishing, encyclopedias represent a unique sort of text for investigating advanced methods of navigation. The user of an electronic excyclopedia normally expects special methods for accessing the entries in an encyclopedia database. Navigation through printed encyclopedias in the traditional sense focuses on the alphabetic order of the entries. In electronic encyclopedias, however, thematic structuring of lemmas and, of course, extensive (hyper-) linking mechanisms have been added. This paper will focus on showing developments, which go beyond these navigational strucutres. We will concentrate on the semantic space formed by lemmas to build a network of semantic distances and thematic trails through the encyclopedia
    Type
    a
  10. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.01
    0.009533988 = product of:
      0.019067977 = sum of:
        0.019067977 = product of:
          0.028601965 = sum of:
            0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878568 = score(doc=5202,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
    Type
    a
  11. Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Houston, A.L.: Semantic indexing and searching using a Hopfield net (1998) 0.01
    0.009247085 = product of:
      0.01849417 = sum of:
        0.01849417 = product of:
          0.027741255 = sum of:
            0.009017859 = weight(_text_:a in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009017859 = score(doc=5704,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a neural network approach to document semantic indexing. Reports results of a study to apply a Hopfield net algorithm to simulate human associative memory for concept exploration in the domain of computer science and engineering. The INSPEC database, consisting of 320.000 abstracts from leading periodical articles was used as the document test bed. Benchmark tests conformed that 3 parameters: maximum number of activated nodes; maximum allowable error; and maximum number of iterations; were useful in positively influencing network convergence behaviour without negatively impacting central processing unit performance. Another series of benchmark tests was performed to determine the effectiveness of various filtering techniques in reducing the negative impact of noisy input terms. Preliminary user tests conformed expectations that the Hopfield net is potentially useful as an associative memory technique to improve document recall and precision by solving discrepancies between indexer vocabularies and end user vocabularies
    Type
    a
  12. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.0058586476 = product of:
      0.011717295 = sum of:
        0.011717295 = product of:
          0.017575942 = sum of:
            0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066539603 = score(doc=1800,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
            0.010921981 = weight(_text_:h in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010921981 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  13. Robertson, S.E.: On term selection for query expansion (1990) 0.00
    0.0020039687 = product of:
      0.0040079374 = sum of:
        0.0040079374 = product of:
          0.012023811 = sum of:
            0.012023811 = weight(_text_:a in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012023811 = score(doc=2650,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the framework of a relevance feedback system, term values or term weights may be used to (a) select new terms for inclusion in a query, and/or (b) weight the terms for retrieval purposes once selected. It has sometimes been assumed that the same weighting formula should be used for both purposes. This paper sketches a quantitative argument which suggests that the two purposes require different weighting formulae
    Type
    a
  14. Ihadjadene, M.; Bouché, R.: Using syntagmatic relationships based on a RAMEAU list as a browsing relevance feedback strategy in a WWW-OPAC (1998) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=141,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on an evaluation of the browsing behaviour of end users of a WWW-OPAC focussing on the browsing relevance feedback (BRF) strategy. Results of this study reveal that BRF is a popular strategy. We also find that the relationships involved in the BRF strategy are generally syntagmatic
    Type
    a
  15. Hemmje, M.: LyberWorld - a 3D graphical user interface for fulltext retrieval (1995) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 2385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=2385,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2385, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2385)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    LyberWorld is a prototype IR user interface. It implements visualizations of an abstract information space: fulltext. The video demonstrates a visual user interface for the probabilistic fulltext retrieval system INQUERY. Visualizations are used to communicate information search and browsing activities in a natural way by applying metaphors of spatial navigation in abstract information spaces. Visualization tools for exploring information spaces and judging relevance of information items are introduced and an example session demonstrates the prototype. The presence of a spatial model in the user's mind is regarded as an essential contribution towards natural interaction and reduction of cognitive costs during retrieval dialogues.
    Type
    a
  16. Qiu, Y.; Frei, H.P.: Concept based query expansion (1993) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=2678,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presentation of a probabilistic query expansion based on an automatically constructed similarity thesaurus. Such thesauri reflect the domain knowledge of their origin collection
    Type
    a
  17. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.: Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence (1996) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=1704,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A procedure that processes a corpus of text and produces numeric vectors containing information about its meanings for each word is presented. This procedure is applied to a large corpus of natural language text taken from Usenet, and the resulting vectors are examined to determine what information is contained within them. These vectors provide the coordinates in a high-dimensional space in which word relationships can be analyzed. Analyses of both vector similarity and multidimensional scaling demonstrate that there is significant semantic information carried in the vectors. A comparison of vector similarity with human reaction times in a single-word priming experiment is presented. These vectors provide the basis for a representational model of semantic memory, hyperspace analogue to language (HAL).
    Type
    a
  18. Hemmje, M.; Kunkel, C.; Willett, A.: LyberWorld - a visualization user interface supporting fulltext retrieval (1994) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=2384,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    LyberWorld is a prototype IR user interface. It implements visualizations of an abstract information space-fulltext. The paper derives a model for such visualizations and an exemplar user interface design is implemented for the probabilistic fulltext retrieval system INQUERY. Visualizations are used to communicate information search and browsing activities in a natural way by applying metaphors of spatial navigation in abstract information spaces. Visualization tools for exploring information spaces and judging relevance of information items are introduced and an example session demonstrates the prototype. The presence of a spatial model in the user's mind and interaction with a system's corresponding display methods is regarded as an essential contribution towards natural interaction and reduction of cognitive costs during e.g. query construction, orientation within the database content, relevance judgement and orientation within the retrieval context.
    Type
    a
  19. Srinivasan, P.: Query expansion and MEDLINE (1996) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=8453,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of query expansion strategies on a test collection of the medical database MEDLINE using Cornell University's SMART retrieval system. Tests 3 expansion strategies for their ability to identify appropriate MeSH terms for user queries. Compares retrieval effectiveness using the original unexpanded and the alternative expanded user queries on a collection of 75 queries and 2.334 Medline citations. Recommends query expansions using retrieval feedback for adding MeSH search terms to a user's initial query
    Type
    a
  20. Fidel, R.; Efthimiadis, E.N.: Terminological knowledge structure for intermediary expert systems (1995) 0.00
    0.0017783458 = product of:
      0.0035566916 = sum of:
        0.0035566916 = product of:
          0.010670074 = sum of:
            0.010670074 = weight(_text_:a in 5695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010670074 = score(doc=5695,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5695, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To provide advice for online searching about term selection and query expansion, an intermediary expert system should indicate a terminological knowledge structure. Terminological attributes could provide the foundation of a knowledge base, and knowledge acquisition could rely on knowledge base techniques coupled with statistical techniques. The strategies of expert searchers would provide 1 source of knowledge. The knowledge structure would include 3 constructs for each term: frequency data, a hedge, and a position in a classification scheme. Switching vocabularies could provide a meta-scheme and facilitate the interoperability of databases in similar subjects. To develop such knowledge structure, research should focus on terminological attributes, word and phrase disambiguation, automated text processing, and the role of thesauri and classification schemes in indexing and retrieval. It should develop techniques that combine knowledge base and statistical methods and that consider user preferences
    Type
    a

Types

  • a 51
  • el 4
  • r 3
  • m 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…