-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.01
0.012307431 = product of:
0.061537154 = sum of:
0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015627023 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015627023 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396934 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996)
0.01
0.010236046 = product of:
0.05118023 = sum of:
0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012501617 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012501617 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006659447 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.009439265 = product of:
0.047196325 = sum of:
0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010938915 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010938915 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=3132,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Libraries and Information Highways MITRE Sponsored Research project aims to help searchers working in digital libraries increase their chance of matching the language of authors. Focuses on whether query formulation can be improved through the addition of semantic knowledge that is interactively gathered from a thesaurus that exists in a distributed, interoperating, cooperative environment. A prototype, ELVIS, was built that improves information retrieval through query expansion and is based on publicly available Z39.50 standard thesauri integrated with networked information discovery and retrieval tools
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998)
0.01
0.0085469205 = product of:
0.0427346 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.009344013 = weight(_text_:in in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009344013 = score(doc=5202,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999)
0.01
0.008408292 = product of:
0.042041462 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.008650876 = weight(_text_:in in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008650876 = score(doc=5362,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast how facet analysis is used to construct the systematic or faceted displays of a selection of information retrieval thesauri. More specifically, the study seeks to examine which principles of facet analysis are used in the thesauri, and the extent to which different thesauri apply these principles in the same way. A measuring instrument was designed for the purpose of evaluating the structure of faceted thesauri. This instrument was applied to fourteen faceted information retrieval thesauri. The study reveals that the thesauri do not share a common definition of what constitutes a facet. In some cases, the thesauri apply both enumerative-style classification and facet analysis to arrange their indexing terms. A number of the facets used in the thesauri are not homogeneous or mutually exclusive. The principle of synthesis is used in only 50% of the thesauri, and no one citation order is used consistently by the thesauri.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.01
0.00532289 = product of:
0.02661445 = sum of:
0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054694577 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054694577 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.008538926 = weight(_text_:des in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008538926 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071366085 = score(doc=1800,freq=24.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994)
0.00
0.002613376 = product of:
0.026133759 = sum of:
0.010529511 = weight(_text_:in in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010529511 = score(doc=5693,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
0.015604248 = product of:
0.031208497 = sum of:
0.031208497 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031208497 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- The process of term selection for query expansion by end-users is discussed within the context of a study of interactive query expansion in a relevance feedback environment. This user study focuses on how users' perceive and understand term relationships, such as hierarchical and associative relationships, in their searches
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:35:22
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995)
0.00
0.0020790326 = product of:
0.020790325 = sum of:
0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071366085 = score(doc=2151,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- We present a model of semantic memory that utilizes a high dimensional semantic space constructed from a co-occurrence matrix. This matrix was formed by analyzing a lot) million word corpus. Word vectors were then obtained by extracting rows and columns of this matrix, These vectors were subjected to multidimensional scaling. Words were found to cluster semantically. suggesting that interword distance may be interpretable as a measure of semantic similarity, In attempting to replicate with our simulation the semantic and ...
- Source
- Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.00
0.0019480734 = product of:
0.019480733 = sum of:
0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005827016 = score(doc=6958,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996)
0.00
0.0018766596 = product of:
0.018766595 = sum of:
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=2230,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.011703186 = product of:
0.023406371 = sum of:
0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023406371 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- We present a deductive data model for concept-based query expansion. It is based on three abstraction levels: the conceptual, linguistic and occurrence levels. Concepts and relationships among them are represented at the conceptual level. The expression level represents natural language expressions for concepts. Each expression has one or more matching models at the occurrence level. Each model specifies the matching of the expression in database indices built in varying ways. The data model supports a concept-based query expansion and formulation tool, the ExpansionTool, for environments providing heterogeneous IR systems. Expansion is controlled by adjustable matching reliability.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.00
0.0018076964 = product of:
0.018076964 = sum of:
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=5697,freq=16.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.009752655 = product of:
0.01950531 = sum of:
0.01950531 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01950531 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- The performance of 8 ranking algorithms was evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in ranking terms for query expansion. The evaluation was conducted within an investigation of interactive query expansion and relevance feedback in a real operational environment. Focuses on the identification of algorithms that most effectively take cognizance of user preferences. user choices (i.e. the terms selected by the searchers for the query expansion search) provided the yardstick for the evaluation of the 8 ranking algorithms. This methodology introduces a user oriented approach in evaluating ranking algorithms for query expansion in contrast to the standard, system oriented approaches. Similarities in the performance of the 8 algorithms and the ways these algorithms rank terms were the main focus of this evaluation. The findings demonstrate that the r-lohi, wpq, enim, and porter algorithms have similar performance in bringing good terms to the top of a ranked list of terms for query expansion. However, further evaluation of the algorithms in different (e.g. full text) environments is needed before these results can be generalized beyond the context of the present study
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.00
0.001777404 = product of:
0.01777404 = sum of:
0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041203224 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Veltman, K.H.: Frontiers in conceptual navigation for cultural heritage (1999)
0.00
6.659447E-4 = product of:
0.013318894 = sum of:
0.013318894 = weight(_text_:in in 6251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013318894 = score(doc=6251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 6251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6251)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: Approaches to search formulation and query expansion in information systems : DRS, DBMS, ES (1992)
0.00
6.580944E-4 = product of:
0.013161888 = sum of:
0.013161888 = weight(_text_:in in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013161888 = score(doc=3871,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Discusses the ways in which systems and/or users formulate and reformulate searches in documents retrieval systems (DRS), database management systems (DBMS) and expert systems (ES). Concludes that query formulation and reformulation has been neglected in these fields
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Query expansion : advances in research in online catalogues (1992)
0.00
5.886175E-4 = product of:
0.01177235 = sum of:
0.01177235 = weight(_text_:in in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01177235 = score(doc=2351,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Query expansion is the process of supplementing or replacing the original query terms with additional terms either at the search formulation or search reformulation stages. Different approaches to implementing query expansion are considered in three online catalogs
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Principles of semantic networks : explorations in the representation of knowledge (1991)
0.00
5.886175E-4 = product of:
0.01177235 = sum of:
0.01177235 = weight(_text_:in in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01177235 = score(doc=1677,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Enthält 3 thematische Sektionen: (1) Issues in knowledge representation; (2) formal analyses; (3) systems for knowledge representation
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.60-61 (O. Sechser)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Ekmekcioglu, F.C.; Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Effectiveness of query expansion in ranked-output document retrieval systems (1992)
0.00
5.2647555E-4 = product of:
0.010529511 = sum of:
0.010529511 = weight(_text_:in in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010529511 = score(doc=5689,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Reports an evaluation of 3 methods for the expansion of natural language queries in ranked output retrieval systems. The methods are based on term co-occurrence data, on Soundex codes, and on a string similarity measure. Searches for 110 queries in a data base of 26.280 titles and abstracts suggest that there is no significant difference in retrieval effectiveness between any of these methods and unexpanded searches
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998)
0.00
5.0463446E-4 = product of:
0.010092689 = sum of:
0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010092689 = score(doc=42,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Parent-Child relationships in MeSH trees were surveyed and described, and their patterns in the relational structure were determined for selected broad subject categories and subcategories. Is-a relationships dominated and were more prevalent overall than previously reported; however, an additional 67 different relationships were also seen, most of them nonhierarchical. Relational profiles were found to vary both within and among subject subdomains, but tended to display characteristic domain patterns. The implications for inferential reasoning and other cognitive and computational operations on hierarchical structures are considered
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Lobin, H.; Witt, A.: Semantic and thematic navigation in electronic encyclopedias (1999)
0.00
5.0463446E-4 = product of:
0.010092689 = sum of:
0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010092689 = score(doc=624,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- In the field of electronic publishing, encyclopedias represent a unique sort of text for investigating advanced methods of navigation. The user of an electronic excyclopedia normally expects special methods for accessing the entries in an encyclopedia database. Navigation through printed encyclopedias in the traditional sense focuses on the alphabetic order of the entries. In electronic encyclopedias, however, thematic structuring of lemmas and, of course, extensive (hyper-) linking mechanisms have been added. This paper will focus on showing developments, which go beyond these navigational strucutres. We will concentrate on the semantic space formed by lemmas to build a network of semantic distances and thematic trails through the encyclopedia
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Interactive query expansion in an OPAC : interface and retrieval issues (1995)
0.00
4.994586E-4 = product of:
0.009989171 = sum of:
0.009989171 = weight(_text_:in in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009989171 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
