Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005) 0.01 
    0.012769748 = product of:
  0.025539497 = sum of:
    0.025539497 = product of:
      0.051078994 = sum of:
        0.051078994 = weight(_text_:x in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051078994 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21896711 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05185498 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.4, x S
  2. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.01 
    0.01041855 = product of:
  0.0208371 = sum of:
    0.0208371 = product of:
      0.0833484 = sum of:
        0.0833484 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0833484 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2363972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05185498 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  3. Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005) 0.01 
    0.010215798 = product of:
  0.020431597 = sum of:
    0.020431597 = product of:
      0.040863194 = sum of:
        0.040863194 = weight(_text_:x in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040863194 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21896711 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05185498 = queryNorm
            0.18661796 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.9, x S
  4. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.01 
    0.008938824 = product of:
  0.017877648 = sum of:
    0.017877648 = product of:
      0.035755295 = sum of:
        0.035755295 = weight(_text_:x in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035755295 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21896711 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05185498 = queryNorm
            0.16329071 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.4, x S
  5. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01 
    0.008782043 = product of:
  0.017564086 = sum of:
    0.017564086 = product of:
      0.035128172 = sum of:
        0.035128172 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035128172 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18158731 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05185498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

Authors

Themes