Search (47 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.9, S.1849-1866
  2. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.139-162
  3. Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The object of this empirical research study is emotion, as depicted and aroused in videos. This paper seeks to answer the questions: Are users able to index such emotions consistently? Are the users' votes usable for emotional video retrieval? Design/methodology/approach - The authors worked with a controlled vocabulary for nine basic emotions (love, happiness, fun, surprise, desire, sadness, anger, disgust and fear), a slide control for adjusting the emotions' intensity, and the approach of broad folksonomies. Different users tagged the same videos. The test persons had the task of indexing the emotions of 20 videos (reprocessed clips from YouTube). The authors distinguished between emotions which were depicted in the video and those that were evoked in the user. Data were received from 776 participants and a total of 279,360 slide control values were analyzed. Findings - The consistency of the users' votes is very high; the tag distributions for the particular videos' emotions are stable. The final shape of the distributions will be reached by the tagging activities of only very few users (less than 100). By applying the approach of power tags it is possible to separate the pivotal emotions of every document - if indeed there is any feeling at all. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first steps in the new research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR). To the authors' knowledge, it is the first research project into the collective indexing of emotions in videos.
  4. Choi, Y.: ¬A Practical application of FRBR for organizing information in digital environments (2012) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Weiand, K.; Hartl, A.; Hausmann, S.; Furche, T.; Bry, F.: Keyword-based search over semantic data (2012) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a long while, the creation of Web content required at least basic knowledge of Web technologies, meaning that for many Web users, the Web was de facto a read-only medium. This changed with the arrival of the "social Web," when Web applications started to allow users to publish Web content without technological expertise. Here, content creation is often an inclusive, iterative, and interactive process. Examples of social Web applications include blogs, social networking sites, as well as many specialized applications, for example, for saving and sharing bookmarks and publishing photos. Social semantic Web applications are social Web applications in which knowledge is expressed not only in the form of text and multimedia but also through informal to formal annotations that describe, reflect, and enhance the content. These annotations often take the shape of RDF graphs backed by ontologies, but less formal annotations such as free-form tags or tags from a controlled vocabulary may also be available. Wikis are one example of social Web applications for collecting and sharing knowledge. They allow users to easily create and edit documents, so-called wiki pages, using a Web browser. The pages in a wiki are often heavily interlinked, which makes it easy to find related information and browse the content.
  6. Syn, S.Y.; Spring, M.B.: Finding subject terms for classificatory metadata from user-generated social tags (2013) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=745)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.964-980
  7. Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.348-364

Types

  • a 45
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications