Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Tsui, E.; Wang, W.M.; Cheung, C.F.; Lau, A.S.M.: ¬A concept-relationship acquisition and inference approach for hierarchical taxonomy construction from tags (2010) 0.02 
    0.01799386 = product of:
  0.03598772 = sum of:
    0.03598772 = product of:
      0.07197544 = sum of:
        0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07197544 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Taxonomy construction is a resource-demanding, top-down, and time consuming effort. It does not always cater for the prevailing context of the captured information. This paper proposes a novel approach to automatically convert tags into a hierarchical taxonomy. Folksonomy describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of keywords or tags to shared content. Using folksonomy as a knowledge source for nominating tags, the proposed method first converts the tags into a hierarchy. This serves to harness a core set of taxonomy terms; the generated hierarchical structure facilitates users' information navigation behavior and permits personalizations. Newly acquired tags are then progressively integrated into a taxonomy in a largely automated way to complete the taxonomy creation process. Common taxonomy construction techniques are based on 3 main approaches: clustering, lexico-syntactic pattern matching, and automatic acquisition from machine-readable dictionaries. In contrast to these prevailing approaches, this paper proposes a taxonomy construction analysis based on heuristic rules and deep syntactic analysis. The proposed method requires only a relatively small corpus to create a preliminary taxonomy. The approach has been evaluated using an expert-defined taxonomy in the environmental protection domain and encouraging results were yielded.
  2. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01 
    0.0086506 = product of:
  0.0173012 = sum of:
    0.0173012 = product of:
      0.0346024 = sum of:
        0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0346024 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  3. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01 
    0.0086506 = product of:
  0.0173012 = sum of:
    0.0173012 = product of:
      0.0346024 = sum of:
        0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0346024 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  4. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01 
    0.0086506 = product of:
  0.0173012 = sum of:
    0.0173012 = product of:
      0.0346024 = sum of:
        0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0346024 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors