Search (244 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hjoerland, B.: Domain analysis in information science : eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative (2002) 0.10
    0.10007422 = product of:
      0.15011132 = sum of:
        0.1407163 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1407163 = score(doc=4464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 4464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4464)
        0.009395021 = product of:
          0.018790042 = sum of:
            0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 4464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018790042 = score(doc=4464,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4464, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    What kind of knowledge is needed by information specialists working in a specific subject field like medicine, sociology or music? What approaches have been used in information science to produce kinds of domain-specific knowledge? This article presents 11 approaches to domain analysis. Together these approaches make a unique competence for information specialists. The approaches are: producing literature guides and subject gateways, producing special classifications and thesauri; research an indexing and retrieving specialities, empirical user studies; bibliometrical studies; historical studies; document and genre studies; epistemological and critical studies; terminological studies, LSP (languages for special purposes), discourse studies; studies of structures and institutions in scientific communication; and domain analysis in professional cognition and artificial intelligence. Specific examples and selective reviews of literature are provided, and the strengths and drawbacks of each of these approaches are discussed
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.422-462
  2. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.04
    0.03551214 = product of:
      0.10653641 = sum of:
        0.10653641 = sum of:
          0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0234353 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08310111 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.xxx
  3. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.03
    0.03356143 = product of:
      0.100684285 = sum of:
        0.100684285 = sum of:
          0.016739499 = weight(_text_:of in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016739499 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.08394479 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08394479 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  4. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.03
    0.033224124 = product of:
      0.09967237 = sum of:
        0.09967237 = sum of:
          0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01657126 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08310111 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  5. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02
    0.022886775 = product of:
      0.06866033 = sum of:
        0.06866033 = sum of:
          0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021173978 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  6. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.02
    0.022141643 = product of:
      0.06642493 = sum of:
        0.06642493 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=4875,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  7. Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006) 0.02
    0.021661952 = product of:
      0.06498586 = sum of:
        0.06498586 = sum of:
          0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0234353 = score(doc=5296,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:58:06
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
  8. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.02
    0.02129588 = product of:
      0.06388764 = sum of:
        0.06388764 = sum of:
          0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016401293 = score(doc=628,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  9. Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.02129588 = product of:
      0.06388764 = sum of:
        0.06388764 = sum of:
          0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016401293 = score(doc=208,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries must learn to accommodate themselves to Google, and complement its mass digitization efforts with niche digitization of our own. We need to plan for what our activities and services will look like when our primary activity is no longer the storage and circulation of widely-available print materials, and once the printed book is no longer the only major vehicle for scholarly communication.
    Pages
    S.5-22
  10. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.02
    0.021157425 = product of:
      0.06347227 = sum of:
        0.06347227 = sum of:
          0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021921717 = score(doc=631,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  11. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.02
    0.020615373 = product of:
      0.06184612 = sum of:
        0.06184612 = sum of:
          0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020295564 = score(doc=4866,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  12. Nicholson, S.; Sierra, T.; Eseryel, U.Y.; Park, J.-H.; Barkow, P.; Pozo, E.J.; Ward, J.: How much of it is real? : analysis of paid placement in Web search engine results (2006) 0.02
    0.020407092 = product of:
      0.06122127 = sum of:
        0.06122127 = sum of:
          0.025606511 = weight(_text_:of in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025606511 = score(doc=5278,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most Web search tools integrate sponsored results with results from their internal editorial database in providing results to users. The goal of this research is to get a better idea of how much of the screen real estate displays real editorial results as compared to sponsored results. The overall average results are that 40% of all results presented on the first screen are real results, and when the entire first Web page is considered, 67% of the results are nonsponsored results. For general search tools such as Google, 56% of the first screen and 82% of the first Web page contain nonsponsored results. Other results include that query structure makes a significant difference in the percentage of nonsponsored results returned by a search. Similarly, the topic of the query also can have a significant effect on the percentage of sponsored results displayed by most Web search tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:57
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.448-461
  13. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.02
    0.020292649 = product of:
      0.060877945 = sum of:
        0.060877945 = sum of:
          0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0133916 = score(doc=4867,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  14. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.02
    0.019723108 = product of:
      0.059169322 = sum of:
        0.059169322 = sum of:
          0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023554565 = score(doc=2717,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Previous work an search-engine design has indicated that information-seekers may benefit from being given the opportunity to exploit multiple sources of evidence of document relatedness. Few existing systems, however, give users more than minimal control over the selections that may be made among methods of exploitation. By applying the methods of "document network analysis" (DNA), a unifying, graph-theoretic model of content-, collaboration-, and context-based systems (CCC) may be developed in which the nature of the similarities between types of document relatedness and document ranking are clarified. The usefulness of the approach to system design suggested by this model may be tested by constructing and evaluating a prototype system (UCXtra) that allows searchers to maintain control over the multiple ways in which document collections may be ranked and re-ranked.
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  15. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.02
    0.019373938 = product of:
      0.058121815 = sum of:
        0.058121815 = sum of:
          0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01657126 = score(doc=4874,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
  16. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.02
    0.018567387 = product of:
      0.055702157 = sum of:
        0.055702157 = sum of:
          0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020087399 = score(doc=5228,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1170-1183
  17. Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet : progress and prospects (2006) 0.02
    0.01775607 = product of:
      0.053268205 = sum of:
        0.053268205 = sum of:
          0.01171765 = weight(_text_:of in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01171765 = score(doc=238,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyses the development of the knowledge structures provided as aids to users in searching the Internet. Specific focus is given to web directories, thesauri and gateways and portals. The paper assumes that users need to be able to access information in two ways - to locate information on a subject directly in response to a search term and to be able to browse so as to familiarize themselves with a domain or to refine a request. Emphasis is to the browsing aspect. Background and development are addressed. Structures are analyzed, problems are identified, and future directions discussed.
    Date
    27.12.2008 15:56:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  18. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.02
    0.017533492 = product of:
      0.052600473 = sum of:
        0.052600473 = sum of:
          0.022921504 = weight(_text_:of in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022921504 = score(doc=2564,freq=30.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                  30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    PageRank is defined as the stationary state of a Markov chain. The chain is obtained by perturbing the transition matrix induced by a web graph with a damping factor alpha that spreads uniformly part of the rank. The choice of alpha is eminently empirical, and in most cases the original suggestion alpha=0.85 by Brin and Page is still used. Recently, however, the behaviour of PageRank with respect to changes in alpha was discovered to be useful in link-spam detection. Moreover, an analytical justification of the value chosen for alpha is still missing. In this paper, we give the first mathematical analysis of PageRank when alpha changes. In particular, we show that, contrarily to popular belief, for real-world graphs values of alpha close to 1 do not give a more meaningful ranking. Then, we give closed-form formulae for PageRank derivatives of any order, and an extension of the Power Method that approximates them with convergence O(t**k*alpha**t) for the k-th derivative. Finally, we show a tight connection between iterated computation and analytical behaviour by proving that the k-th iteration of the Power Method gives exactly the PageRank value obtained using a Maclaurin polynomial of degree k. The latter result paves the way towards the application of analytical methods to the study of PageRank.
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
    Source
    http://vigna.di.unimi.it/ftp/papers/PageRankAsFunction.pdf [Proceedings of the ACM World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2005]
  19. Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006) 0.02
    0.017274415 = product of:
      0.051823243 = sum of:
        0.051823243 = sum of:
          0.022144277 = weight(_text_:of in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022144277 = score(doc=5288,freq=28.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                  28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:14:12
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.564-576
  20. Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003) 0.02
    0.016726863 = product of:
      0.050180584 = sum of:
        0.050180584 = sum of:
          0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020501617 = score(doc=2117,freq=24.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                  24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an application of the model described in Part I to the evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduates. The study observed how 36 undergraduate used four major search engines to find information for their own individual problems and how they evaluated these engines based an actual interaction with the search engines. User evaluation was based an 16 performance measures representing five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Non-performance (user-related) measures were also applied. Each participant searched his/ her own topic an all four engines and provided satisfaction ratings for system features and interaction and reasons for satisfaction. Each also made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her own information need and participated in post-search Interviews to provide reactions to the search results and overall performance. The study found significant differences in precision PR1 relative recall, user satisfaction with output display, time saving, value of search results, and overall performance among the four engines and also significant engine by discipline interactions an all these measures. In addition, the study found significant differences in user satisfaction with response time among four engines, and significant engine by discipline interaction in user satisfaction with search interface. None of the four search engines dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Content analysis of verbal data identified a number of user criteria and users evaluative comments based an these criteria. Results from both quantitative analysis and content analysis provide insight for system design and development, and useful feedback an strengths and weaknesses of search engines for system improvement
    Date
    24. 1.2004 18:27:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.13, S.1193-1222

Types

  • a 213
  • el 25
  • m 13
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…