-
Taylor, M.: Using the Google search appliance for federated searching : a case study (2005)
0.07
0.073703736 = product of:
0.1105556 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=355)
0.036538422 = product of:
0.073076844 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the University of Nevada, Reno's experiment of federated searching with version 4.1 of the Google Search Appliance. The project's testbed included locally held CONTENTdm and geospatial data collections and a sample of records from EBSCO's Academic Search Premiere database. The latter set of records revealed the GSA's limitations in being able to index and retrieve content that is dynamically generated and that requires third party authentication.
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Callicott, B.; Vaughn, D.: Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar : testing the performance of Schoogle (2005)
0.07
0.073319346 = product of:
0.10997902 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
0.045213994 = product of:
0.09042799 = sum of:
0.09042799 = weight(_text_:database in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09042799 = score(doc=357,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.44214234 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- How does the content of Google Scholar, a.k.a. "Schoogle, compare to that of subscription databases and the library catalog? Five sample research topics indigenous to undergraduate libraries were searched in Google Scholar, the College of Charleston online catalog, EBSCO's Academic Search Premier database, and a subject-specific subscription database. Points of consideration included document type, availability of full-text materials, local availability of materials (either in print or online), and relevance of materials to the research topics. Results showed that Google Scholar, while a substantive supplementary research tool, does not provide the same quality in terms of relevance for many research topics.
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005)
0.07
0.06762412 = product of:
0.10143618 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.5-22
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Lackie, R.J.: Google's Print and Scholar initiatives : the value of and impact on libraries and information services (2005)
0.06
0.064490765 = product of:
0.09673614 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.03197112 = product of:
0.06394224 = sum of:
0.06394224 = weight(_text_:database in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06394224 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31264183 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Google regularly makes headlines with new Web-based tools, but two recent projects promise to have profound implications for the future of librarianship. With Google's recent big push to add content from books and journals into its database via its expanded Google Print and new Google Scholar initiatives, today's academic libraries and publishers, among others, are taking notice. Many are sitting back and watching how others deal with these initiatives, while some are raising their voices in question, praise, or protest.
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Egger-Sider, F.; Devine, J.: Google, the Invisible Web, and librarians : slaying the research goliath (2005)
0.04
0.03739211 = product of:
0.11217632 = sum of:
0.11217632 = weight(_text_:reference in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11217632 = score(doc=358,freq=6.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5449844 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Effective Web research must include both Visible and Invisible Web resources and reference librarians have an important role to play in mediating the research process. The Google search engine is the public's tool of choice and dominates Web searching even though it accesses a limited portion of the Web. The Invisible Web is less well-known to the public and harder to access but contains a greater wealth of resources. Reference librarians should help guide people to the best solutions for their information needs: at times Google. at other times the diverse tools that access the Invisible Web.
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Miller, W.: Libraries and their interrelationships with Google : introduction (2005)
0.04
0.037008584 = product of:
0.11102575 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Sherman, C.: Reference resources on the Web (2000)
0.04
0.037008584 = product of:
0.11102575 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=6869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Bates, M.E.: Quick answers to odd questions (2004)
0.04
0.03530363 = product of:
0.052955445 = sum of:
0.039253537 = weight(_text_:reference in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039253537 = score(doc=3071,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19070482 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
0.013701909 = product of:
0.027403818 = sum of:
0.027403818 = weight(_text_:database in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027403818 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.13398936 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "One of the things I enjoyed the most when I was a reference librarian was the wide range of questions my clients sent my way. What was the original title of the first Godzilla movie? (Gojira, released in 1954) Who said 'I'm as pure as the driven slush'? (Tallulah Bankhead) What percentage of adults have gone to a jazz performance in the last year? (11%) I have found that librarians, speech writers and journalists have one thing in common - we all need to find information on all kinds of topics, and we usually need the answers right now. The following are a few of my favorite sites for finding answers to those there-must-be-an-answer-out-there questions. - For the electronic equivalent to the "ready reference" shelf of resources that most librarians keep hidden behind their desks, check out RefDesk . It is particularly good for answering factual questions - Where do I get the new Windows XP Service Pack? Where is the 386 area code? How do I contact my member of Congress? - Another resource for lots of those quick-fact questions is InfoPlease, the publishers of the Information Please almanac .- Right now, it's full of Olympics data, but it also has links to facts and factoids that you would look up in an almanac, atlas, or encyclopedia. - If you want numbers, start with the Statistical Abstract of the US. This source, produced by the U.S. Census Bureau, gives you everything from the divorce rate by state to airline cost indexes going back to 1980. It is many librarians' secret weapon for pulling numbers together quickly. - My favorite question is "how does that work?" Haven't you ever wondered how they get that Olympic torch to continue to burn while it is being carried by runners from one city to the next? Or how solar sails manage to propel a spacecraft? For answers, check out the appropriately-named How Stuff Works. - For questions about movies, my first resource is the Internet Movie Database. It is easy to search, is such a popular site that mistakes are corrected quickly, and is a fun place to catch trailers of both upcoming movies and those dating back to the 30s. - When I need to figure out who said what, I still tend to rely on the print sources such as Bartlett's Familiar Quotations . No, the current edition is not available on the web, but - and this is the librarian in me - I really appreciate the fact that I not only get the attribution but I also see the source of the quote. There are far too many quotes being attributed to a celebrity, but with no indication of the publication in which the quote appeared. Take, for example, the much-cited quote of Margaret Meade, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has!" Then see the page on the Institute for Intercultural Studies site, founded by Meade, and read its statement that it has never been able to verify this alleged quote from Meade. While there are lots of web-based sources of quotes (see QuotationsPage.com and Bartleby, for example), unless the site provides the original source for the quotation, I wouldn't rely on the citation. Of course, if you have a hunch as to the source of a quote, and it was published prior to 1923, head over to Project Gutenberg , which includes the full text of over 12,000 books that are in the public domain. When I needed to confirm a quotation of the Red Queen in "Through the Looking Glass", this is where I started. - And if you are stumped as to where to go to find information, instead of Googling it, try the Librarians' Index to the Internet. While it is somewhat US-centric, it is a great directory of web resources."
-
Adlington, J.; Benda, C.: Checking under the hood : evaluating Google Scholar for reference use (2005)
0.03
0.03489203 = product of:
0.10467609 = sum of:
0.10467609 = weight(_text_:reference in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10467609 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Fischer, T.; Neuroth, H.: SSG-FI - special subject gateways to high quality Internet resources for scientific users (2000)
0.03
0.03197872 = product of:
0.09593615 = sum of:
0.09593615 = sum of:
0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054807637 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Project SSG-FI at SUB Göttingen provides special subject gateways to international high quality Internet resources for scientific users. Internet sites are selected by subject specialists and described using an extension of qualified Dublin Core metadata. A basic evaluation is added. These descriptions are freely available and can be searched and browsed. These are now subject gateways for 3 subject ares: earth sciences (GeoGuide); mathematics (MathGuide); and Anglo-American culture (split into HistoryGuide and AnglistikGuide). Together they receive about 3.300 'hard' requests per day, thus reaching over 1 million requests per year. The project SSG-FI behind these guides is open to collaboration. Institutions and private persons wishing to contribute can notify the SSG-FI team or send full data sets. Regular contributors can request registration with the project to access the database via the Internet and create and edit records
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:42
-
Nicholson, S.; Sierra, T.; Eseryel, U.Y.; Park, J.-H.; Barkow, P.; Pozo, E.J.; Ward, J.: How much of it is real? : analysis of paid placement in Web search engine results (2006)
0.03
0.03197872 = product of:
0.09593615 = sum of:
0.09593615 = sum of:
0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054807637 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Most Web search tools integrate sponsored results with results from their internal editorial database in providing results to users. The goal of this research is to get a better idea of how much of the screen real estate displays real editorial results as compared to sponsored results. The overall average results are that 40% of all results presented on the first screen are real results, and when the entire first Web page is considered, 67% of the results are nonsponsored results. For general search tools such as Google, 56% of the first screen and 82% of the first Web page contain nonsponsored results. Other results include that query structure makes a significant difference in the percentage of nonsponsored results returned by a search. Similarly, the topic of the query also can have a significant effect on the percentage of sponsored results displayed by most Web search tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:57
-
Libraries and Google : [Themenheft] (2005)
0.03
0.03084049 = product of:
0.09252147 = sum of:
0.09252147 = weight(_text_:reference in 7559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09252147 = score(doc=7559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 7559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7559)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4, S.1-240
-
Milne, R.: ¬The Google Library Project at Oxford (2005)
0.03
0.03084049 = product of:
0.09252147 = sum of:
0.09252147 = weight(_text_:reference in 7134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09252147 = score(doc=7134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 7134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Force, R.: Image: Google's most important product (2005)
0.02
0.024672393 = product of:
0.074017175 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=104)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Anderson, R.: ¬The (uncertain) future of libraries in a Google world : sounding an alarm (2005)
0.02
0.024672393 = product of:
0.074017175 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Herring, M.Y.: ¬A gaggle of Googles : limitations and defects of electronic access as Panacea (2005)
0.02
0.024672393 = product of:
0.074017175 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Cathcart, R.; Roberts, A.: Evaluating Google Scholar as a tool for information literacy (2005)
0.02
0.024672393 = product of:
0.074017175 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Watters, C.; Amoudi, A.: Geosearcher : location-based ranking of search engine results (2003)
0.02
0.02180752 = product of:
0.06542256 = sum of:
0.06542256 = weight(_text_:reference in 5152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06542256 = score(doc=5152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31784135 = fieldWeight in 5152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Waters and Amoudi describe GeoSearcher, a prototype ranking program that arranges search engine results along a geo-spatial dimension without the provision of geo-spatial meta-tags or the use of geo-spatial feature extraction. GeoSearcher uses URL analysis, IptoLL, Whois, and the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names to determine site location. It accepts the first 200 sites returned by a search engine, identifies the coordinates, calculates their distance from a reference point and ranks in ascending order by this value. For any retrieved site the system checks if it has already been located in the current session, then sends the domain name to Whois to generate a return of a two letter country code and an area code. With no success the name is stripped one level and resent. If this fails the top level domain is tested for being a country code. Any remaining unmatched names go to IptoLL. Distance is calculated using the center point of the geographic area and a provided reference location. A test run on a set of 100 URLs from a search was successful in locating 90 sites. Eighty three pages could be manually found and 68 had sufficient information to verify location determination. Of these 65 ( 95%) had been assigned reasonably correct geographic locations. A random set of URLs used instead of a search result, yielded 80% success.
-
Force, R.: Keeping up with Google : Resources and strategies for staying ahead of the pack (2005)
0.02
0.02158834 = product of:
0.06476502 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
-
Phipps, S.E.; Maloney, K.: Choices in the paradigm shift : where next for libraries? (2005)
0.02
0.02158834 = product of:
0.06476502 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
