Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006) 0.05 
    0.048231583 = product of:
  0.12057896 = sum of:
    0.0862113 = weight(_text_:mail in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0862113 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30639184 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.034367654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034367654 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:14:12
  2. Edelman, B.: Assessing and improving the safety of Internet search engines (2007) 0.02 
    0.024384238 = product of:
  0.12192119 = sum of:
    0.12192119 = weight(_text_:mail in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12192119 = score(doc=383,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.43330348 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Where Internet users go, attackers follow. Users embrace e-mail; then spammers fill their inboxes with junk mail. With the rise in online commerce, phishers trick them into giving up their passwords. Users find handy downloadable applications; adware vendors bundle them with pop-up-spewing add-ons. The rise of Internet search brings a new type of risk. Hostile Web sites might seek to harm users or take advantage of them - whether through spyware, spam, scams, or other bad practices - because search engines often do not filter these sites from their results. Consider this scenario: Suzy wants to perform Beyonce's Crazy in Love for her school talent show. To make sure she dresses the part, she performs a Google search for >celebrity photos<. When she clicks the first search result, celebritypictures.duble.com, she is quickly prompted to install an adware-bundled ActiveX control in order to browse the site's contents. Eager to view photos of her celebrity role model, she accepts the installation of a new browser toolbar and a pop-up serving adware program. In principle, search engines' listing rules, ranking rules, and advertising policies might shield users from some bad practices, and users' good judgment could protect them from others. But empirically, search engines often lead users to dangerous content. My analysis of search engine safety finds bad practices among approximately 5% of search results for popular keywords, or roughly one site per page of search results.
  3. Slone, D.J.: ¬The impact of time constraints on Internet and Web use (2007) 0.02 
    0.020690711 = product of:
  0.103453554 = sum of:
    0.103453554 = weight(_text_:mail in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103453554 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.36767018 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study examines the influence of time constraints on Internet and Web search goals and search behavior. Specifically, it looks at the searching behavior of public library Internet users who, previously limited to 30 minutes per Internet session, are given an unlimited amount of time for use. Interviews and observations were conducted with 34 participants searching on their own queries. Despite an increase in the time allowed for searching, most people spent less than 30 minutes on the Internet, carrying out tasks like paying bills, shopping, browsing, and making reservations. Those who took more than 30 minutes were looking for jobs or browsing. E-mail use was universal. In this context, influences like time-dependent and time-independent tasks, use of search hubs to perform more efficient searches, and search diversity were recorded. Though there are a number of large and small studies of Internet and Web use, few of them focus on temporal influences. This study extends knowledge in this area of inquiry.
  4. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02 
    0.019441282 = product of:
  0.09720641 = sum of:
    0.09720641 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09720641 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02 
    0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02 
    0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  7. Zschunke, P.: Richtig googeln : Ein neues Buch hilft, alle Möglichkeiten der populären Suchmaschine zu nutzen (2003) 0.01 
    0.014630544 = product of:
  0.07315272 = sum of:
    0.07315272 = weight(_text_:mail in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07315272 = score(doc=3068,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2599821 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Da Google im Unterschied zu Yahoo oder Lycos nie ein auf möglichst viele Besuche angelegtes Internet-Portal werden wollte, ist die Suche in der Datenbank auch außerhalb der Google-Web-Site möglich. Dafür gibt es zunächst die "Google Toolbar" für den Internet Explorer, mit der dieser Browser eine eigene Leiste, für die Google-Suche erhält. Freie Entwickler bieten im Internet eine eigene Umsetzung: dieses Werkzeugs auch für den Netscape/ Mozilla-Browser an. Daneben kann ein GoogleSucheingabefeld aber auch auf die eigene WebSeite platziert werden - dazu sind nur vier Zei-len HTML-Code nötig. Eine Google-Suche zu starten, ist übrigens auch ganz ohne Browser möglich. Dazu hat das Unternehmen im Aprilvergangenen Jahres die API ("Application Programming Interface") frei gegeben, die in eigene Programme' eingebaut wird. So kann man etwa eine Google-Suche mit einer E-Mail starten: Die Suchbegriffe werden in die Betreff Zeile einer ansonsten leeren EMail eingetragen, die an die Adresse google@capeclear.com geschickt wird. Kurz danach trifft eine automatische Antwort-Mail mit den ersten zehn Treffern ein. Die entsprechenden Kenntnisse vorausgesetzt, können Google-Abfragen auch in Web-Services eingebaut werden - das sind Programme, die Daten aus dem Internet verarbeiten. Als Programmiertechniken kommen dafür Perl, PHP, Python oder Java in Frage. Calishain und Dornfest stellen sogar eine Reihe von abgedrehten Sites vor, die solche Programme für abstrakte Gedichte oder andere Kunstwerke einsetzen."
  8. Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006) 0.01 
    0.013793808 = product of:
  0.06896904 = sum of:
    0.06896904 = weight(_text_:mail in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06896904 = score(doc=5954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.24511346 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Approximately 91 million American adults use the Internet on a typical day The number-one Internet activity is reading and writing e-mail. Search engine use is next in line and continues to increase in popularity. In fact, survey findings indicate that nearly 60 million American adults use search engines on a given day. Even though there are many Internet search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN receive over 81% of all search requests. Despite claims that the quality of search provided by Yahoo! and MSN now equals that of Google, Google continues to thrive as the search engine of choice, receiving over 46% of all search requests, nearly double the volume of Yahoo! and over four times that of MSN. I use Google's search engine on a daily basis and rarely request information from other search engines. One day, I decided to visit the homepages of Google. Yahoo!, and MSN to compare the quality of search results. Coffee was on my mind that day, so I entered the simple query "coffee" in the search box at each homepage. Table 1 shows the top ten (unsponsored) results returned by each search engine. Although ordered differently, two webpages, www.peets.com and www.coffeegeek.com, appear in all three top ten lists. In addition, each pairing of top ten lists has two additional results in common. Depending on the information I hoped to obtain about coffee by using the search engines, I could argue that any one of the three returned better results: however, I was not looking for a particular webpage, so all three listings of search results seemed of equal quality. Thus, I plan to continue using Google. My decision is indicative of the problem Yahoo!, MSN, and other search engine companies face in the quest to obtain a larger percentage of Internet search volume. Search engine users are loyal to one or a few search engines and are generally happy with search results. Thus, as long as Google continues to provide results deemed high in quality, Google likely will remain the top search engine. But what set Google apart from its competitors in the first place? The answer is PageRank. In this article I explain this simple mathematical algorithm that revolutionized Web search.
  9. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.01 
    0.013747062 = product of:
  0.06873531 = sum of:
    0.06873531 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06873531 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  10. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01 
    0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  11. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01 
    0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  12. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.01 
    0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  13. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01 
    0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  14. Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005) 0.01 
    0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.5-22
  15. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01 
    0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  16. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.01 
    0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
  17. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.01 
    0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  18. Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006) 0.01 
    0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:58:06
  19. Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet : progress and prospects (2006) 0.01 
    0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27.12.2008 15:56:22
  20. Fischer, T.; Neuroth, H.: SSG-FI - special subject gateways to high quality Internet resources for scientific users (2000) 0.01 
    0.008248237 = product of:
  0.041241184 = sum of:
    0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041241184 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:42

Authors

Types

  • a 31
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes