Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Hildreth, C.R.: Intelligent interfaces and retrieval methods for subject searching in bibliographic retrieval systems (1989) 0.02
    0.019841243 = product of:
      0.07936497 = sum of:
        0.07936497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07936497 = score(doc=2306,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Crawford, W.; Stovel, L.; Bales, K.: Bibliographic displays in the online catalog (1986) 0.02
    0.016200306 = product of:
      0.06480122 = sum of:
        0.06480122 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06480122 = score(doc=222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    PRECIS
    Bibliographic on / line information retrieval services
    Subject
    Bibliographic on / line information retrieval services
  3. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.02
    0.016037485 = product of:
      0.06414994 = sum of:
        0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06414994 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Borgman, C.L.: Information retrieval from CD-ROM : status quo or a revolution in end-user access? (1987) 0.02
    0.016037485 = product of:
      0.06414994 = sum of:
        0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06414994 = score(doc=6536,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6536, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6536)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    CD-ROM data bases are being adopted rapidly by libraries and are being made available to end-users. Compares online information retrieval systems and CD-ROM based retrieval systems, assessing structure and content characteristics that contribute to user behaviour. CD-ROM systems are comparable in database content and in interface style, although CD-ROM systems often provide multiple user interfaces, have smaller databases, less time pressure, and no telecommunications requirements. Some of the differences might lead to better retrieval performance by novice users, but many unanswered questions remain about the influence of time pressure, database size, interface style, training, and skill transfer among systems
  5. Lynch, C.A.: ¬The use of heuristics in user interfaces for online information retrieval systems (1987) 0.01
    0.013746415 = product of:
      0.05498566 = sum of:
        0.05498566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05498566 = score(doc=2236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Tague, J.; Schultz, R.: Evaluation of the user interface in an information retrieval system : a model (1989) 0.01
    0.011340214 = product of:
      0.045360856 = sum of:
        0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045360856 = score(doc=1665,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Planning the evaluation of an information retrieval system involves a determination of the performance descriptors and measures appropriate to the system objectives and a development of an evaluation design that ensures the effect of variation in components of interest will be isolated and assessed in an anbiased fashion. Presents an evaluation model that is appropriate to the assessment of the effect, from the perspective of the user, of variation in the interface to the system. The model is exemplified by an application to evaluation of an experimental on-line public access catalogue interface.
  7. Tesky, N.; Henry, M.; Christopher, S.: ¬A user interface for multiple retrieval systems (1987) 0.01
    0.011340214 = product of:
      0.045360856 = sum of:
        0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045360856 = score(doc=2724,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2724, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2724)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we present the results of an experiment to help professional scientists and engineers undertake their own literature searches using a number of the major online bibliographic databases. The end-users, or experimental subjects, are already familiar with Deco, the text storage and retrieval system used by Unilever, but have little or no knowledge of the major online database systems, such as Orbit, Dialog, BRS, etc. The paper describes the design and development of a front-end system which simplifies the 'logon' procedure and converts Deco format commands into any of the other required languages. The users can thus search any of the major online databases just as if they were searching their own files on their local system ...
  8. Borgman, C.L.; Chignell, M.H.; Valdez, F.: Designing an information retrieval interface based on children's categorization of knowledge : a pilot study (1989) 0.01
    0.011340214 = product of:
      0.045360856 = sum of:
        0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045360856 = score(doc=2769,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The study assessed the ability of children to categorise concepts that will be used to organise an information retrieval interface. The work was done of Project SEED (Science for Early Educational Development), a project to develop hands-on science programmes for elementary schools. Aims to tailor an interface to the particular skills of children in organising science knowledge. The results are promising for the design of IR interfaces based on children's abilities to manipulate information.
  9. Croucher, C.: Problems of subject access : user studies and interface design (1986) 0.01
    0.008018742 = product of:
      0.03207497 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=2395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2395)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A research project at Middlesex Polytechnic is examning the problems of subject access in an OPAC. A series of user studies have been carried out which examined students' use of existing catalogue facilities, which in turn led to the experimental evaluation of various interface designs for an online catalogue. The experiments were primarily concerned with the effect of the following variables on the speed and accuracy of retrieval of specific items, the use of colour, the speed of presentation of information, the amount of information on a screen, the paging and scrolling of information, the position of a sought item within a list