Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.04
    0.043793283 = product of:
      0.08758657 = sum of:
        0.08758657 = product of:
          0.13137984 = sum of:
            0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07055833 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
            0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060821515 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  2. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.03
    0.02591448 = product of:
      0.05182896 = sum of:
        0.05182896 = product of:
          0.07774344 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In a changing information environment, we need to reassess each element of bibliographic control, including classification theories and systems. Every classification system is a theoretical construct imposed an "reality." The classificatory relationships that are assumed to be valuable have generally received less attention than the topics included in the systems. Relationships are functions of both the syntactic and semantic axes of classification systems, and both explicit and implicit relationships are discussed. Examples are drawn from a number of different systems, both bibliographic and non-bibliographic, and the cultural warrant (i. e., the sociocultural context) of classification systems is examined. The part-whole relationship is discussed as an example of a universally valid concept that is treated as a component of the cultural warrant of a classification system.
  3. Svenonius, E.: Indexical contents (1982) 0.02
    0.019956911 = product of:
      0.039913822 = sum of:
        0.039913822 = product of:
          0.11974146 = sum of:
            0.11974146 = weight(_text_:i in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11974146 = score(doc=27,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  4. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01
    0.014191686 = product of:
      0.028383372 = sum of:
        0.028383372 = product of:
          0.085150115 = sum of:
            0.085150115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085150115 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  5. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.013980819 = product of:
      0.027961638 = sum of:
        0.027961638 = product of:
          0.041942455 = sum of:
            0.020654924 = weight(_text_:c in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020654924 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
            0.021287529 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021287529 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  6. Weller, K.; Peters, I.: Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation (2007) 0.01
    0.013304608 = product of:
      0.026609216 = sum of:
        0.026609216 = product of:
          0.079827644 = sum of:
            0.079827644 = weight(_text_:i in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079827644 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of I-Know '07, Graz, September 5-7
  7. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.011468614 = product of:
      0.022937229 = sum of:
        0.022937229 = product of:
          0.068811685 = sum of:
            0.068811685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068811685 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  8. Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003) 0.01
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.019671358 = sum of:
        0.019671358 = product of:
          0.05901407 = sum of:
            0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05901407 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  9. Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008) 0.01
    0.008231806 = product of:
      0.016463611 = sum of:
        0.016463611 = product of:
          0.049390834 = sum of:
            0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049390834 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008) 0.01
    0.007868543 = product of:
      0.015737087 = sum of:
        0.015737087 = product of:
          0.04721126 = sum of:
            0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04721126 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.007095843 = product of:
      0.014191686 = sum of:
        0.014191686 = product of:
          0.042575058 = sum of:
            0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042575058 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  12. Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998) 0.01
    0.006884975 = product of:
      0.01376995 = sum of:
        0.01376995 = product of:
          0.04130985 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002) 0.01
    0.0059014075 = product of:
      0.011802815 = sum of:
        0.011802815 = product of:
          0.035408445 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01
    0.0050684595 = product of:
      0.010136919 = sum of:
        0.010136919 = product of:
          0.030410757 = sum of:
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  15. Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.009835679 = sum of:
        0.009835679 = product of:
          0.029507035 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006) 0.00
    0.0029507037 = product of:
      0.0059014075 = sum of:
        0.0059014075 = product of:
          0.017704222 = sum of:
            0.017704222 = weight(_text_:c in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017704222 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)