-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.00
9.2292955E-4 = product of:
0.013843942 = sum of:
0.009859984 = weight(_text_:in in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009859984 = score(doc=1194,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003983958 = score(doc=1194,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
- Pages
- S.165-196
- Source
- Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.00
5.575784E-4 = product of:
0.008363675 = sum of:
0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006110009 = score(doc=834,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
- Pages
- S.466-486
-
Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967)
0.00
1.3146391E-4 = product of:
0.003943917 = sum of:
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314