Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.05 
    0.0511827 = product of:
  0.1023654 = sum of:
    0.021792494 = weight(_text_:in in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021792494 = score(doc=1194,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047673445 = queryNorm
        0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056475073 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047673445 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    0.02409783 = product of:
      0.04819566 = sum of:
        0.04819566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04819566 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
    Source
    Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
  2. Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965) 0.01 
    0.010927526 = product of:
  0.032782577 = sum of:
    0.013504315 = weight(_text_:in in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013504315 = score(doc=834,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047673445 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
    0.019278264 = product of:
      0.038556527 = sum of:
        0.038556527 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038556527 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
  3. Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967) 0.01 
    0.007951878 = product of:
  0.047711264 = sum of:
    0.047711264 = product of:
      0.09542253 = sum of:
        0.09542253 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09542253 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314

Authors