Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0028535603 = product of:
  0.051364083 = sum of:
    0.051364083 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051364083 = score(doc=4835,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025905682 = queryNorm
        0.51797354 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.

Object

Kaiser systematic indexing

0.0018639378 = product of:
  0.03355088 = sum of:
    0.03355088 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03355088 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025905682 = queryNorm
        0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others. The concepts of Fundamental Categories, Rounds and Levels, Integrative Levels, etc. are discussed.

0.0018639378 = product of:
  0.03355088 = sum of:
    0.03355088 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03355088 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025905682 = queryNorm
        0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others.

0.001164961 = product of:
  0.020969298 = sum of:
    0.020969298 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020969298 = score(doc=3866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025905682 = queryNorm
        0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Abstract

Basic grammar can achieve most/all of the goals of facet analysis without requiring the use of facet indicators. Facet analysis is thus rendered far simpler for classificationist, classifier, and user. We compare facet analysis and grammar, and show how various facets can be represented grammatically. We then address potential challenges in employing grammar as subject classification. A detailed review of basic grammar supports the hypothesis that it is feasible to usefully employ grammatical construction in subject classification. A manageable - and programmable - set of adjustments is required as classifiers move fairly directly from sentences in a document (or object or idea) description to formulating a subject classification. The user likewise can move fairly quickly from a query to the identification of relevant works. A review of theories in linguistics indicates that a grammatical approach should reduce ambiguity while encouraging ease of use. This paper applies the recommended approach to a small sample of recently published books. It finds that the approach is feasible and results in a more precise subject description than the subject headings assigned at present. It then explores PRECIS, an indexing system developed in the 1970s. Though our approach differs from PRECIS in many important ways, the experience of PRECIS supports our conclusions regarding both feasibility and precision.

6.2488613E-4 = product of:
  0.011247951 = sum of:
    0.011247951 = weight(_text_:und in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011247951 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025905682 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)

Content

Die angegebene Seite enthält das Programm mit den Titeln der Beiträge und den Vortragenden. Vgl. auch die Mail von Jiri Pika vom 06.09.2017 an Inetbib.