Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mann, T.: Is precoordination unnecessary in LCSH? : Are Web sites more important to catalog than books?: a reference librarian's thought on the future of bibliographic control (2000) 0.01
    0.014544163 = product of:
      0.05817665 = sum of:
        0.05817665 = weight(_text_:web in 6135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05817665 = score(doc=6135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 6135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6135)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  2. Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M: ¬A conceptual model for the new Soggettario : subject indexing in the light of FRBR (2002) 0.01
    0.013997929 = product of:
      0.055991717 = sum of:
        0.055991717 = weight(_text_:search in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055991717 = score(doc=5685,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.3258447 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    The National Central Library in Florence, Italy, has commissioned a feasibility study for the renewal of the Soggettario [Subject headings for Italian libraries]. [It is indispensable for the theoretical development to take place within the international debate and to approach the topic of a new Soggettario with reference to the FRBR.}. The subject is analysed as a relation between the entities in the third group: concept, object, event, place and the entity work. The model identifies the logical entities, attributes and relationships which run between the entities. The article returns to and amplifies the user tasks of FRBR which involve a subject: (1) Find the works on a given subject; (2) Find the works in which a concept is significantly treated; (3) Select a work by its main subject only; (4) Lead to a search for works on related subjects; (5) Lead to a search for works in which related or connected subjects are handled.
  3. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.01
    0.00989803 = product of:
      0.03959212 = sum of:
        0.03959212 = weight(_text_:search in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03959212 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
  4. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.01
    0.005861068 = product of:
      0.023444273 = sum of:
        0.023444273 = product of:
          0.046888545 = sum of:
            0.046888545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046888545 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Lucarelli, A.: Work in progress on the new Soggettario (2005) 0.01
    0.0050904574 = product of:
      0.02036183 = sum of:
        0.02036183 = weight(_text_:web in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02036183 = score(doc=5042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Work on a prototype of the new Soggettario (the main Italian subject heading list) has begun in October 2004 at the Central National Library of Florence (BNCF). BNCF is involving in the renewal of the most used subject indexing tool of Italian libraries. The project had already produced a Feasibility Study, representing a reference for the works which have started recently. An Italian abstract of the Feasibility Study, and more documentation, can be found in the BCNF website at the Web address <http://www bncf.firenze.sbn.it/progetti/>. Together with the project team and the BNCF staff, some young external consultants are working, who are focusing on the terminological component of the system, namely the prototype of the Thesaurus. At the same time, documents are produced which define procedures, establish criteria, and give guidelines. The list of items by which the prototype started consists of: - the terms included in the updates provided by the Italian National Bibliography (BNI) during the period 1986-1998 (already published in the form of lists); - the items introduced from 1999 to 2005 - other items introduced in the past years but never recorded; - some terms from the Soggettario (1956) or from BNI updates (1956-19S5), being especially outdated and needing revision. In building the semantic networks and the hierarchies, and in making the terminological control, of course, more terms have to be included, which come from the Soggettario, the BNI and other authoritative sources both catalographic (various indexing tools) and lexicographic (general and special directories). DDC numbers are also related to the terms in the Thesaurus. The prototype, to be completed in April 2006, will include a sample of terms for each disciplinary area. About 5000 terms will have a complete structure, but 6000 more will be included in the Thesaurus in order to fill the semantic networks, and marked with a different working status. For the prototype the AgroVoc software is used, which has been provided by FAO and adapted by the BNCF computing staff in order to match the specific requirements of the project. Thanks to the potential of this software, we intend to test in future on the multilingual side of terminology. Such work is likely to begin by testing links to the corresponding forms used by the Library of Congress. We are currently beginning to focus on this, and we wish that external parties be involved which are concerned with multilingual terminology in more or less specialistic contexts. We will follow the road of conventions with Italian universities, which could cooperate to this development through their students and graded students. We are also looking at the developments in the work of the British BSI working group on standards for thesauri convened by Stella Dextre Clarke.
  6. MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000) 0.01
    0.0050237724 = product of:
      0.02009509 = sum of:
        0.02009509 = product of:
          0.04019018 = sum of:
            0.04019018 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04019018 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:10
  7. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01
    0.0050237724 = product of:
      0.02009509 = sum of:
        0.02009509 = product of:
          0.04019018 = sum of:
            0.04019018 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04019018 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  8. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.01
    0.0050237724 = product of:
      0.02009509 = sum of:
        0.02009509 = product of:
          0.04019018 = sum of:
            0.04019018 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04019018 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.01
    0.0050237724 = product of:
      0.02009509 = sum of:
        0.02009509 = product of:
          0.04019018 = sum of:
            0.04019018 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04019018 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  10. Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009) 0.00
    0.0041864775 = product of:
      0.01674591 = sum of:
        0.01674591 = product of:
          0.03349182 = sum of:
            0.03349182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03349182 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:22:43