Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.02
    0.024099609 = product of:
      0.048199218 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=7238,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in library OPACs might be improved for some users by taking advantage of all of the hierarchical relationships which are indicated on existing LCSH entries. Recommends that cross references pointing to broader terms be displayed, in addition to those for narrower and related terms to which users have traditionally benn directed. Traces the old practice back to Charles Cutter, reports on deliberations of the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee nearly 120 years later. Discusses practical concerns related to implementing the change, including the accuracy of hierarchical relationships in the LCSH system and possible techniques for using the MARC format to generate the cross references
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  2. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.02
    0.023227734 = product of:
      0.04645547 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  3. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.02
    0.020186728 = product of:
      0.040373456 = sum of:
        0.024359472 = weight(_text_:for in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024359472 = score(doc=2337,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.27441877 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.016013984 = product of:
          0.032027967 = sum of:
            0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032027967 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  4. Ralston, N.M.: Controlled vocabularies for MEDLARS databases (1995) 0.01
    0.0072056293 = product of:
      0.028822517 = sum of:
        0.028822517 = weight(_text_:for in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028822517 = score(doc=2640,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For many years, searching medical and health-related topics has caused thousands of searchers to consult the well-known Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) controlled vocabulary. This plan works well for searching MEDLINE, but what about the MEDLARS databases such as TOXLIT, BIOETHICSLINE and POPLINE? Several printed vocabularies are available for searchers who wish to benefit from the consistency afforded by consulting established term lists. Occasionally, use of keywords from vocabularies other than MeSH is recommended even when information in the database is also indexed to MeSH. Search techniques available for use with several of the controlled vocabularies which are discussed vary, but built-in consistency of term use is a continuing theme from one controlled vocabulary to another
  5. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.0067657465 = product of:
      0.027062986 = sum of:
        0.027062986 = weight(_text_:for in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027062986 = score(doc=2323,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3048749 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1270-1282
  6. Piternick, A.B.: Vocabularies for online subject searching (1990) 0.01
    0.0064449105 = product of:
      0.025779642 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Chen, H.; Yim, T.; Fye, D.: Automatic thesaurus generation for an electronic community system (1995) 0.01
    0.005638122 = product of:
      0.022552488 = sum of:
        0.022552488 = weight(_text_:for in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022552488 = score(doc=2918,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.2540624 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an algorithmic approach to the automatic generation of thesauri for electronic community systems. The techniques used included terms filtering, automatic indexing, and cluster analysis. The testbed for the research was the Worm Community System, which contains a comprehensive library of specialized community data and literature, currently in use by molecular biologists who study the nematode worm. The resulting worm thesaurus included 2709 researchers' names, 798 gene names, 20 experimental methods, and 4302 subject descriptors. On average, each term had about 90 weighted neighbouring terms indicating relevant concepts. The thesaurus was developed as an online search aide. Tests the worm thesaurus in an experiment with 6 worm researchers of varying degrees of expertise and background. The experiment showed that the thesaurus was an excellent 'memory jogging' device and that it supported learning and serendipitous browsing. Despite some occurrences of obvious noise, the system was useful in suggesting relevant concepts for the researchers' queries and it helped improve concept recall. With a simple browsing interface, an automatic thesaurus can become a useful tool for online search and can assist researchers in exploring and traversing a dynamic and complex electronic community system
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.175-193
  8. Studwell, W.E.: Who killed the subject code? (1994) 0.01
    0.0055814567 = product of:
      0.022325827 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=1595,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A movement for a subject heading code to standardize LCSH and their usage gained considerable attention in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Examines the reasons for the lack of progress in this project, which include: the lack of any plan from the LoC which could serve as a philosophical foundation for either a subject access system or the changes made to it; the belief that online catalogues make a controlled subject vocabulary obsolete; and professional ignorance, apathy, and negativism. Warns that, in an increasingly complex age, lack of standardization of any technical system or process tends to lead to the demise of that system or process
  9. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬The exact-display approach for online catalog subject searching (1996) 0.01
    0.0055814567 = product of:
      0.022325827 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 6930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=6930,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 6930, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6930)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Introducess a new approach to display retrieved subject headings in subject searching designed to encourage users to browse bibliographic information. Emphasizes the importance of the exact display approach by showing how many user queries could be candidates for this approach, demonstrates an implementation of the exact-display approach in an experimental online catalogue. End user experiences gives opportunities to make recommendations for enhancing the original design of the exact display approach so that future implementations of this approach in operational online catalogues are responsive to the needs of online catalogue users
  10. Gomez, L.; Lochbaum, C.C.; Landauer, T.K.: All the right words: finding what you want as an function of richness of indexing vocabulary (1990) 0.01
    0.0055242092 = product of:
      0.022096837 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for information Science. 41(1990) no.8, S.547-559
  11. Cochrane, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.0055242092 = product of:
      0.022096837 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 2098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=2098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 2098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2098)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  12. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.01
    0.0055242092 = product of:
      0.022096837 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=386,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Using subject headings for Online Retrieval is an indispensable tool for online system desingners who are developing new systems or refining exicting ones. The book describes subject analysis and subject searching in online catalogs, including the limitations of retrieval, and demonstrates how such limitations can be overcome through system design and programming. The book describes the Library of Congress Subject headings system and system characteristics, shows how information is stored in machine readable files, and offers examples of and recommendations for successful methods. Tables are included to support these recommendations, and diagrams, graphs, and bar charts are used to provide results of data analyses.
  13. Connell, T.H.: Subject cataloging (1996) 0.01
    0.0052082743 = product of:
      0.020833097 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 4459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=4459,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4459, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4459)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses established approaches to subject access using subject headings (such as LCSH), and the demands for improved subject access associated with the widespread availability of OPACs and the evidence of problems experienced by catalogue users in subject searching
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
  14. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.00
    0.004784106 = product of:
      0.019136423 = sum of:
        0.019136423 = weight(_text_:for in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019136423 = score(doc=5698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
  15. Informatics 10: prospects for intelligent retrieval : Proc. of a conference jointly sponsored by Aslib, the Aslib Informatics Group and the Information Retrieval Specialist Group of the British Computer Society, King's College, Cambridge, 21.-23.3.1989 (1990) 0.00
    0.0046035075 = product of:
      0.01841403 = sum of:
        0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01841403 = score(doc=2184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=5608,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
  17. Studwell, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets : getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment (1991) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries using the LCSH can increase the effectiveness of their subject access. This can be accomplished through one of four methods for applying an increased number of headings: the addition of subject headings in situations where none have been supplied by LC; the use of pattern secondary headings; the use of major + minor techniques; and the use of minor + major techniques. Each of these methods will provide additional subject access to supplement that produced by the Library of Congress
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  18. Meikle, D.: Syndetic structure and OPACs : a literature review (1995) 0.00
    0.0036828062 = product of:
      0.014731225 = sum of:
        0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014731225 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to gauge whether syndetic structure, the cross reference system long regarded as an integral component of the controlled vocabulary which predominates as the indexing framework for online subject searching, still has a role to play in assisting end users in their information quests. To this end, examines a number of existing and proposed enhancements to OPACs by means of a literatur review. These include: Boolean and keyword searching; online browsing; artificial intelligence; classification clustering; and hypertext. Discusses Dervin's sensemaking theories and methodologies
  19. Davies, R.: Thesaurus-aided searching in search and retrieval protocols (1996) 0.00
    0.0036828062 = product of:
      0.014731225 = sum of:
        0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014731225 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open system protocols for search and retrieval have not provided explicit ways in which to implement thesaurus-aided searching. A number of different approaches within the existing protocols, as well as a proposed service, are evaluated. A general approach to implementing thesaurus-aided searching, particularly during consultation of a thesaurus, requires an entirely new service, whose main features are described
  20. Studwell, W.E.: ¬The three camps : the present and possible future status of subject access in online catalogues (1996) 0.00
    0.0036828062 = product of:
      0.014731225 = sum of:
        0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014731225 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the future of LCSH and whether their viability can be maintained through a written standardization code. Until there is an online substitute for LC subject headings which has been tested on a large scale over a period of time, a successor to the present combination of LC's controlled vocabulary headings plus computerized techniques such as keyword searching is unlikely to emerge