Search (112 results, page 6 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00
    0.0018771215 = product of:
      0.0056313644 = sum of:
        0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056313644 = score(doc=2322,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Cochrane, P.A.: Improving LCSH for use in online catalogs revisited : What progress has been made? What issues still remain? (2000) 0.00
    0.0018771215 = product of:
      0.0056313644 = sum of:
        0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056313644 = score(doc=5609,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 1986 Libraries Unlimited published Cochrane's book, Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs; Exercises for Self-Help with a Selection of Background Readings. This was preceded in 1981 by an ERIC publication (ED 208 900) by Cochrane, with Monika Kirtland Bibliographic and Bibliometric Essay which documented critical views of LCSH and an analysis of vocabulary control in LCSH (parts of which were published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly' 1(2/3) (1982), 71-94). Three features of LCSH will be re-examined to check on progress since the time of these earlier publications: notes, structure of relationships between headings in the list, and links between Library of Congress classification numbers and LCSH or other vocabularies
    Type
    a
  3. Lucarelli, A.; Viti, E.: Florence-Washington round trip : ways and intersections between semantic indexing tools in different languages (2015) 0.00
    0.0018771215 = product of:
      0.0056313644 = sum of:
        0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 1886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056313644 = score(doc=1886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1886)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995) 0.00
    0.0017697671 = product of:
      0.0053093014 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Chan, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA (1995) 0.00
    0.0017697671 = product of:
      0.0053093014 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Mixter, J.; Childress, E.R.: FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) users : summary and case studies (2013) 0.00
    0.001564268 = product of:
      0.004692804 = sum of:
        0.004692804 = weight(_text_:a in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004692804 = score(doc=2011,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This document presents: a brief overview of FAST; a brief analysis of common characteristics of parties that have either chosen to adopt FAST or chosen against using FAST; suggested improvements for FAST vocabulary and services; tables summarizing FAST adopters and non-adopters; and sixteen individual "case studies" presented as edited write-ups of interviews.
  7. Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991) 0.00
    0.0015485462 = product of:
      0.0046456386 = sum of:
        0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046456386 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Studwell, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets : getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment (1991) 0.00
    0.0015485462 = product of:
      0.0046456386 = sum of:
        0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046456386 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Lorenzo, L.; Mak, L.; Smeltekop, N.: FAST Headings in MODS : Michigan State University libraries digital repository case study (2023) 0.00
    0.0015485462 = product of:
      0.0046456386 = sum of:
        0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046456386 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011) 0.00
    0.0015326635 = product of:
      0.0045979903 = sum of:
        0.0045979903 = weight(_text_:a in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045979903 = score(doc=4549,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
    Type
    a
  11. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.00
    0.0013273255 = product of:
      0.0039819763 = sum of:
        0.0039819763 = weight(_text_:a in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039819763 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991) 0.00
    0.0012514144 = product of:
      0.0037542433 = sum of:
        0.0037542433 = weight(_text_:a in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037542433 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information or Document Retrieval is the subject of this book. It is not an introductory book, although it is self-contained in the sense that it is not necessary to have a background in the theory or practice of Information Retrieval in order to understand its arguments. The book presents, as clearly as possible, one particular perspective on Information Retrieval, and attempts to say that certain aspects of the theory or practice of the management of documents are more important than others. The majority of Information Retrieval research has been aimed at the more experimentally tractable small-scale systems, and although much of that work has added greatly to our understanding of Information Retrieval it is becoming increasingly apparent that retrieval systems with large data bases of documents are a fundamentally different genre of systems than small-scale systems. If this is so, which is the thesis of this book, then we must now study large information retrieval systems with the same rigor and intensity that we once studied small-scale systems. Hegel observed that the quantitative growth of any system caused qualitative changes to take place in its structure and processes.

Years

Types

  • a 94
  • el 8
  • m 7
  • s 5
  • d 1
  • More… Less…