Search (117 results, page 6 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.01
    0.012728224 = product of:
      0.050912894 = sum of:
        0.036153924 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036153924 = score(doc=1970,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
        0.014758972 = weight(_text_:of in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014758972 = score(doc=1970,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Meikle, D.: Syndetic structure and OPACs : a literature review (1995) 0.01
    0.012214197 = product of:
      0.048856787 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=3349,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to gauge whether syndetic structure, the cross reference system long regarded as an integral component of the controlled vocabulary which predominates as the indexing framework for online subject searching, still has a role to play in assisting end users in their information quests. To this end, examines a number of existing and proposed enhancements to OPACs by means of a literatur review. These include: Boolean and keyword searching; online browsing; artificial intelligence; classification clustering; and hypertext. Discusses Dervin's sensemaking theories and methodologies
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: New approaches to subject indexing at the British Library (2017) 0.01
    0.01208817 = product of:
      0.04835268 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019129815 = score(doc=5158,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The constantly changing metadata landscape means that libraries need to re-think their approach to standards and subject analysis, to enable the discovery of vast areas of both print and digital content. This article presents a case study from the British Library that assesses the feasibility of adopting FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) to selectively extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content, or implement FAST as a replacement for all LCSH in current cataloging workflows.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Kreider, L.J.: LCSH works! : Subject searching effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings through cooperation (2000) 0.01
    0.012059253 = product of:
      0.04823701 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=6576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
        0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023188837 = score(doc=6576,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The nature of a library's collections determines what kind of subject access to provide to those collections. The collections of the Cleveland Public Library serve both the recreational and research needs of a large urban population. The Cleveland Public Library uses Library of Congress Subject Headings to describe its collections. A study of subject searches entered by library patrons over the course of one week reveals several patterns among the types of subject headings used most frequently, reflecting the characteristics of the population served. Other topics discussed include subject access to fiction, juvenileliterature, and specialized collections
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  5. Studwell, W.E.: Who killed the subject code? (1994) 0.01
    0.01167148 = product of:
      0.04668592 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=1595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=1595,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    A movement for a subject heading code to standardize LCSH and their usage gained considerable attention in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Examines the reasons for the lack of progress in this project, which include: the lack of any plan from the LoC which could serve as a philosophical foundation for either a subject access system or the changes made to it; the belief that online catalogues make a controlled subject vocabulary obsolete; and professional ignorance, apathy, and negativism. Warns that, in an increasingly complex age, lack of standardization of any technical system or process tends to lead to the demise of that system or process
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬The exact-display approach for online catalog subject searching (1996) 0.01
    0.01167148 = product of:
      0.04668592 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=6930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6930)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 6930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=6930,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 6930, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6930)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Introducess a new approach to display retrieved subject headings in subject searching designed to encourage users to browse bibliographic information. Emphasizes the importance of the exact display approach by showing how many user queries could be candidates for this approach, demonstrates an implementation of the exact-display approach in an experimental online catalogue. End user experiences gives opportunities to make recommendations for enhancing the original design of the exact display approach so that future implementations of this approach in operational online catalogues are responsive to the needs of online catalogue users
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Danskin, A.; Seeman, D.; Bouchard, M.; Kammerer, K.; Kilpatrick, L.; Mumbower, K.: FAST the inside track : where we are, where do we want to be, and how do we get there? (2023) 0.01
    0.010361289 = product of:
      0.041445155 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
        0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016396983 = score(doc=1150,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This is an overview of the development of FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) from its inception in the late 1990s, through its development and implementation to the work being undertaken by OCLC and the FAST Policy and Outreach Committee (FPOC) to develop and promote FAST. FPOC members explain how FAST is used by institutions in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. They cover their experience of implementing FAST and the benefits they have derived. The final section considers the value of FAST as a faceted vocabulary and the potential for future development and linked data.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Seeman, D.; Chan, T.; Dykes, K.: Implementation and maintenance of FAST as linked data in a digital collections platform at University of Victoria Libraries (2023) 0.01
    0.010361289 = product of:
      0.041445155 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=1165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1165)
        0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 1165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016396983 = score(doc=1165,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 1165, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1165)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    University of Victoria Libraries has implemented faceted vocabularies, particularly FAST, in its digital collections platform (Vault). The process involved migrating a variety of standardized (pre-coordinated Library of Congress subject headings) and non-standardized metadata to conform to a URI-centric metadata application profile. The authors argue that faceted vocabularies and FAST have helped to create a robust and intuitive user navigation in the platform and allowed for an efficient and straightforward metadata creation process. Maintaining FAST as linked data within Vault has required putting in place some technical processes to keep URIs and textual labels up to date and solutions (FAST Updater) have been locally developed.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Walker, S.; Jones, R.M.: Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues : T.1: Stemming, automatic spelling correction and cross-reference tables (1987) 0.01
    0.010331843 = product of:
      0.082654744 = sum of:
        0.082654744 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082654744 = score(doc=2141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.009160647 = product of:
      0.03664259 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
        0.011594418 = weight(_text_:of in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011594418 = score(doc=5599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.009160647 = product of:
      0.03664259 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
        0.011594418 = weight(_text_:of in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011594418 = score(doc=5602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989) 0.01
    0.008349391 = product of:
      0.066795126 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  13. Simonds, M.J.: Database limitations & online catalogs (1984) 0.01
    0.008349391 = product of:
      0.066795126 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  14. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access in the online catalog (1982) 0.01
    0.008349391 = product of:
      0.066795126 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Hoffman, H.: LCSH online (1987) 0.01
    0.008349391 = product of:
      0.066795126 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=2901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2901)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  16. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject access in online catalogs (2001) 0.01
    0.007379888 = product of:
      0.059039105 = sum of:
        0.059039105 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059039105 = score(doc=4137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  17. Dykstra, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog (1989) 0.01
    0.006262043 = product of:
      0.050096344 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=454,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

Years

Types

  • a 94
  • m 10
  • el 8
  • s 6
  • d 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications