Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Widhalm, R.; Mueck, T.A.: Merging topics in well-formed XML topic maps (2003) 0.02
    0.022123788 = product of:
      0.044247575 = sum of:
        0.044247575 = product of:
          0.08849515 = sum of:
            0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08849515 = score(doc=2186,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003. Eds. D. Fensel et al
    Year
    2003
  2. Kent, R.E.: ¬The IFF foundation for ontological knowledge organization (2003) 0.02
    0.022123788 = product of:
      0.044247575 = sum of:
        0.044247575 = product of:
          0.08849515 = sum of:
            0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08849515 = score(doc=5527,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.187-203
    Year
    2003
  3. Paralic, J.; Kostial, I.: Ontology-based information retrieval (2003) 0.02
    0.01999318 = product of:
      0.03998636 = sum of:
        0.03998636 = product of:
          0.07997272 = sum of:
            0.07997272 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07997272 = score(doc=1153,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.4110885 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  4. Rindflesch, T.C.; Fizsman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing : interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text (2003) 0.02
    0.01843649 = product of:
      0.03687298 = sum of:
        0.03687298 = product of:
          0.07374596 = sum of:
            0.07374596 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07374596 = score(doc=2097,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.3790807 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(2003) no.6), S.462-477
    Year
    2003
  5. McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003) 0.01
    0.014280844 = product of:
      0.028561687 = sum of:
        0.028561687 = product of:
          0.057123374 = sum of:
            0.057123374 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057123374 = score(doc=3084,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.29363465 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  6. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.012146326 = product of:
      0.024292652 = sum of:
        0.024292652 = product of:
          0.048585303 = sum of:
            0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048585303 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  7. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01
    0.010628035 = product of:
      0.02125607 = sum of:
        0.02125607 = product of:
          0.04251214 = sum of:
            0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251214 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  8. Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006) 0.01
    0.009894058 = product of:
      0.019788116 = sum of:
        0.019788116 = product of:
          0.039576232 = sum of:
            0.039576232 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039576232 = score(doc=1978,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.20343605 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.
  9. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.01
    0.009109745 = product of:
      0.01821949 = sum of:
        0.01821949 = product of:
          0.03643898 = sum of:
            0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03643898 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  10. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.01
    0.009109745 = product of:
      0.01821949 = sum of:
        0.01821949 = product of:
          0.03643898 = sum of:
            0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03643898 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01
    0.009109745 = product of:
      0.01821949 = sum of:
        0.01821949 = product of:
          0.03643898 = sum of:
            0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03643898 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  12. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.01
    0.009109745 = product of:
      0.01821949 = sum of:
        0.01821949 = product of:
          0.03643898 = sum of:
            0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03643898 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  13. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.009109745 = product of:
      0.01821949 = sum of:
        0.01821949 = product of:
          0.03643898 = sum of:
            0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03643898 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  14. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.01
    0.00858875 = product of:
      0.0171775 = sum of:
        0.0171775 = product of:
          0.034355 = sum of:
            0.034355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034355 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.01
    0.007591454 = product of:
      0.015182908 = sum of:
        0.015182908 = product of:
          0.030365815 = sum of:
            0.030365815 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365815 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a