Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0039636497 = product of:
  0.047563795 = sum of:
    0.047563795 = weight(_text_:informatik in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047563795 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16874103 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033070438 = queryNorm
        0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Field

Informatik

0.0016726116 = product of:
  0.020071339 = sum of:
    0.020071339 = product of:
      0.060214017 = sum of:
        0.060214017 = weight(_text_:21st in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060214017 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18985903 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Abstract

The beginning of the 21st century attested to the first movements toward information architecture (IA), originating from the field of library and information science (LIS). IA is acknowledged as an important meta-discipline concerned with the design, implementation, and maintenance of digital information spaces. Despite the relevance of IA, there is little research about the subject within LIS, and still less if one considers initiatives for creating a theory for IA. In this article, we provide a theory for IA and describe the resources needed to create it through ontological models. We also choose the "document" as the key entity for such theory, contemplating kinds of documents that not only serve to register information, but also create claims and obligations in society. To achieve our goals, we provide a background for subtheories from LIS and from Applied Ontology. As a result, we present some basic theory for IA in the form of a formal framework to represent corporations in which IA activities take place, acknowledging that our approach is de facto a subset of IA we call the enterprise information architecture (EAI) approach. By doing this, we highlight the effects that documents cause within corporations in the scope of EIA.

0.0015922756 = product of:
  0.019107306 = sum of:
    0.019107306 = weight(_text_:internet in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019107306 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033070438 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Abstract

The lack of standardization in the production, organization and dissemination of information in documentation centers and institutions alike, as a result from the digitization of collections and their availability on the internet has called for integration efforts. The sheer availability of multimedia content has fostered the development of many distinct and, most of the time, independent metadata standards for its description. This study aims at presenting and comparing the existing standards of metadata, vocabularies and ontologies for multimedia annotation and also tries to offer a synthetic overview of its main strengths and weaknesses, aiding efforts for semantic integration and enhancing the findability of available multimedia resources on the web. We also aim at unveiling the characteristics that could, should and are perhaps not being highlighted in the characterization of multimedia resources.

0.0013268963 = product of:
  0.015922755 = sum of:
    0.015922755 = weight(_text_:internet in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015922755 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033070438 = queryNorm
        0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Theme

Internet

9.334559E-4 = product of:
  0.01120147 = sum of:
    0.01120147 = product of:
      0.02240294 = sum of:
        0.02240294 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02240294 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Date

22. 1.2021 14:24:32

7.4676465E-4 = product of:
  0.008961176 = sum of:
    0.008961176 = product of:
      0.017922351 = sum of:
        0.017922351 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017922351 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22