-
Kottmann, N.; Studer, T.: Improving semantic query answering (2006)
0.02
0.016936237 = product of:
0.033872474 = sum of:
0.033872474 = product of:
0.06774495 = sum of:
0.06774495 = weight(_text_:c in 3979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774495 = score(doc=3979,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 3979, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3979)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The retrieval problem is one of the main reasoning tasks for knowledge base systems. Given a knowledge base K and a concept C, the retrieval problem consists of finding all individuals a for which K logically entails C(a). We present an approach to answer retrieval queries over (a restriction of) OWL ontologies. Our solution is based on reducing the retrieval problem to a problem of evaluating an SQL query over a database constructed from the original knowledge base. We provide complete answers to retrieval problems. Still, our system performs very well as is shown by a standard benchmark.
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.015428137 = product of:
0.030856274 = sum of:
0.030856274 = product of:
0.061712548 = sum of:
0.061712548 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061712548 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.01234251 = product of:
0.02468502 = sum of:
0.02468502 = product of:
0.04937004 = sum of:
0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04937004 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.010799696 = product of:
0.021599391 = sum of:
0.021599391 = product of:
0.043198783 = sum of:
0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043198783 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010799696 = product of:
0.021599391 = sum of:
0.021599391 = product of:
0.043198783 = sum of:
0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043198783 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Blanco, E.; Cankaya, H.C.; Moldovan, D.: Composition of semantic relations : model and applications (2010)
0.01
0.01047876 = product of:
0.02095752 = sum of:
0.02095752 = product of:
0.04191504 = sum of:
0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 4761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04191504 = score(doc=4761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: http://www.hlt.utdallas.edu/~eduardo/papers/csr_model_and_applications.pdf. Vgl. für den Proceedingsband: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C/C10/C10-1000.pdf.
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.01
0.008981795 = product of:
0.01796359 = sum of:
0.01796359 = product of:
0.03592718 = sum of:
0.03592718 = weight(_text_:c in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03592718 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Eds.: C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel and R. Studer. 2004. S.299-311
-
Menzel, C.: Knowledge representation, the World Wide Web, and the evolution of logic (2011)
0.01
0.008981795 = product of:
0.01796359 = sum of:
0.01796359 = product of:
0.03592718 = sum of:
0.03592718 = weight(_text_:c in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03592718 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tzitzikas, Y.; Spyratos, N.; Constantopoulos, P.; Analyti, A.: Extended faceted ontologies (2002)
0.01
0.008981795 = product of:
0.01796359 = sum of:
0.01796359 = product of:
0.03592718 = sum of:
0.03592718 = weight(_text_:c in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03592718 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advanced Information Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the 14th Internarional Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2002), Toronto, Canada, May 27-31. Eds.: Anne Banks Pidduck, John Mylopoulos, Carson C. Woo, M. Tamer Özsu
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.0077140685 = product of:
0.015428137 = sum of:
0.015428137 = product of:
0.030856274 = sum of:
0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030856274 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=4687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Smith, M.K., C. Welty u. D.L. Mc Guinness
-
Lange, C.: Ontologies and languages for representing mathematical knowledge on the Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.0059878635 = product of:
0.011975727 = sum of:
0.011975727 = product of:
0.023951454 = sum of:
0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023951454 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Waard, A. de; Fluit, C.; Harmelen, F. van: Drug Ontology Project for Elsevier (DOPE) (2007)
0.01
0.0059878635 = product of:
0.011975727 = sum of:
0.011975727 = product of:
0.023951454 = sum of:
0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023951454 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.01
0.00523938 = product of:
0.01047876 = sum of:
0.01047876 = product of:
0.02095752 = sum of:
0.02095752 = weight(_text_:c in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02095752 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
