-
Scheir, P.; Pammer, V.; Lindstaedt, S.N.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : does it exist? (2007)
0.01
0.00601455 = product of:
0.0721746 = sum of:
0.0721746 = weight(_text_:systeme in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0721746 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17439179 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Content
- Enthält einen Überblick über Modelle, Systeme und Projekte
-
Xu, G.; Cao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Li, X.; Feng, Z.: Network security situation awareness based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules for Internet of Things (2017)
0.00
0.0018491952 = product of:
0.022190342 = sum of:
0.022190342 = weight(_text_:internet in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022190342 = score(doc=306,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Internet of Things (IoT) brings the third development wave of the global information industry which makes users, network and perception devices cooperate more closely. However, if IoT has security problems, it may cause a variety of damage and even threaten human lives and properties. To improve the abilities of monitoring, providing emergency response and predicting the development trend of IoT security, a new paradigm called network security situation awareness (NSSA) is proposed. However, it is limited by its ability to mine and evaluate security situation elements from multi-source heterogeneous network security information. To solve this problem, this paper proposes an IoT network security situation awareness model using situation reasoning method based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules. Ontology technology can provide a unified and formalized description to solve the problem of semantic heterogeneity in the IoT security domain. In this paper, four key sub-domains are proposed to reflect an IoT security situation: context, attack, vulnerability and network flow. Further, user-defined rules can compensate for the limited description ability of ontology, and hence can enhance the reasoning ability of our proposed ontology model. The examples in real IoT scenarios show that the ability of the network security situation awareness that adopts our situation reasoning method is more comprehensive and more powerful reasoning abilities than the traditional NSSA methods. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7999187/]
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.00
0.001839732 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044153567 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Wang, Y.-H.; Jhuo, P.-S.: ¬A semantic faceted search with rule-based inference (2009)
0.00
0.0015690941 = product of:
0.01882913 = sum of:
0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01882913 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Semantic Search has become an active research of Semantic Web in recent years. The classification methodology plays a pretty critical role in the beginning of search process to disambiguate irrelevant information. However, the applications related to Folksonomy suffer from many obstacles. This study attempts to eliminate the problems resulted from Folksonomy using existing semantic technology. We also focus on how to effectively integrate heterogeneous ontologies over the Internet to acquire the integrity of domain knowledge. A faceted logic layer is abstracted in order to strengthen category framework and organize existing available ontologies according to a series of steps based on the methodology of faceted classification and ontology construction. The result showed that our approach can facilitate the integration of inconsistent or even heterogeneous ontologies. This paper also generalizes the principles of picking appropriate facets with which our facet browser completely complies so that better semantic search result can be obtained.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.00
0.0014717856 = product of:
0.017661426 = sum of:
0.017661426 = product of:
0.035322852 = sum of:
0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035322852 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Hesse, W.; Verrijn-Stuart, A.: Towards a theory of information systems : the FRISCO approach (1999)
0.00
0.0013075785 = product of:
0.015690941 = sum of:
0.015690941 = weight(_text_:internet in 3059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015690941 = score(doc=3059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 3059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3059)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Information Systems (IS) is among the most widespread terms in the Computer Science field but a well founded, widely accepted theory of IS is still missing. With the Internet publication of the FRISCO report, the IFIP task group "FRamework of Information System COncepts" has taken a first step towards such a theory. Among the major achievements of this report are: (1) it builds on a solid basis formed by semiotics and ontology, (2) it defines a compendium of about 100 core IS concepts in a coherent and consistent way, (3) it goes beyond the common narrow view of information systems as pure technical artefacts by adopting an interdisciplinary, socio-technical view on them. In the autumn of 1999, a first review of the report and its impact was undertaken at the ISCO-4 conference in Leiden. In a workshop specifically devoted to the subject, the original aims and goals of FRISCO were confirmed to be still valid and the overall approach and achievements of the report were acknowledged. On the other hand, the workshop revealed some misconceptions, errors and weaknesses of the report in its present form, which are to be removed through a comprehensive revision now under way. This paper reports on the results of the Leiden conference and the current revision activities. It also points out some important consequences of the FRISCO approach as a whole.
-
Gómez-Pérez, A.; Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the Semantic Web (2015)
0.00
0.0013075785 = product of:
0.015690941 = sum of:
0.015690941 = weight(_text_:internet in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015690941 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.00
0.0012878124 = product of:
0.015453748 = sum of:
0.015453748 = product of:
0.030907497 = sum of:
0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030907497 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.00
0.0012878124 = product of:
0.015453748 = sum of:
0.015453748 = product of:
0.030907497 = sum of:
0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030907497 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011)
0.00
0.0010460628 = product of:
0.012552753 = sum of:
0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012552753 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to investigate how a faceted classification can be expressed in RDF and shared on the Semantic Web. Statement of the Problem Faceted classification outlines facets as well as subfacets and facet values. Hierarchical relationships and associative relationships are established in a faceted classification. RDF is used to describe how a specific URI has a relationship to a facet value. Not only does RDF decompose "information into pieces," but by incorporating facet values RDF also given the URI the hierarchical and associative relationships expressed in the faceted classification. Combining faceted classification and RDF creates more knowledge than if the two stood alone. An application understands the subjectpredicate-object relationship in RDF and can display hierarchical and associative relationships based on the object (facet) value. This paper continues to investigate if the above idea is indeed useful, used, and applicable. If so, how can a faceted classification be expressed in RDF? What would this expression look like? Literature Review This paper used the same articles as the paper A Survey of Faceted Classification: History, Uses, Drawbacks and the Semantic Web (Putkey, 2010). In that paper, appropriate resources were discovered by searching in various databases for "faceted classification" and "faceted search," either in the descriptor or title fields. Citations were also followed to find more articles as well as searching the Internet for the same terms. To retrieve the documents about RDF, searches combined "faceted classification" and "RDF, " looking for these words in either the descriptor or title.
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.00
9.19866E-4 = product of:
0.011038392 = sum of:
0.011038392 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076784 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
OWLED 2009; OWL: Experiences and Directions, Sixth International Workshop, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, 23-24 October 2009, Co-located with ISWC 2009. (2009)
0.00
7.8454707E-4 = product of:
0.009414565 = sum of:
0.009414565 = weight(_text_:internet in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009414565 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.09785385 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Theme
- Internet
