-
Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007)
0.05
0.04646363 = product of:
0.09292726 = sum of:
0.09292726 = sum of:
0.062487323 = weight(_text_:o in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062487323 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22544876 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.030439943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030439943 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
-
Fonseca, F.: ¬The double role of ontologies in information science research (2007)
0.02
0.018746197 = product of:
0.037492394 = sum of:
0.037492394 = product of:
0.07498479 = sum of:
0.07498479 = weight(_text_:o in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07498479 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22544876 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontology refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.
-
Ferrández, O.; Izquierdo, R.; Ferrández, S.; Vicedo González, J.L.: Addressing ontology-based question answering with collections of user queries (2009)
0.02
0.018746197 = product of:
0.037492394 = sum of:
0.037492394 = product of:
0.07498479 = sum of:
0.07498479 = weight(_text_:o in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07498479 = score(doc=4212,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22544876 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.02
0.017841928 = product of:
0.035683855 = sum of:
0.035683855 = product of:
0.14273542 = sum of:
0.14273542 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14273542 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3809542 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Calegari, S.; Sanchez, E.: Object-fuzzy concept network : an enrichment of ontologies in semantic information retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.015621831 = product of:
0.031243661 = sum of:
0.031243661 = product of:
0.062487323 = sum of:
0.062487323 = weight(_text_:o in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062487323 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22544876 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article shows how a fuzzy ontology-based approach can improve semantic documents retrieval. After formally defining a fuzzy ontology and a fuzzy knowledge base, a special type of new fuzzy relationship called (semantic) correlation, which links the concepts or entities in a fuzzy ontology, is discussed. These correlations, first assigned by experts, are updated after querying or when a document has been inserted into a database. Moreover, in order to define a dynamic knowledge of a domain adapting itself to the context, it is shown how to handle a tradeoff between the correct definition of an object, taken in the ontology structure, and the actual meaning assigned by individuals. The notion of a fuzzy concept network is extended, incorporating database objects so that entities and documents can similarly be represented in the network. Information retrieval (IR) algorithm, using an object-fuzzy concept network (O-FCN), is introduced and described. This algorithm allows us to derive a unique path among the entities involved in the query to obtain maxima semantic associations in the knowledge domain. Finally, the study has been validated by querying a database using fuzzy recall, fuzzy precision, and coefficient variant measures in the crisp and fuzzy cases.
-
Innovations and advanced techniques in systems, computing sciences and software engineering (2008)
0.02
0.015621831 = product of:
0.031243661 = sum of:
0.031243661 = product of:
0.062487323 = sum of:
0.062487323 = weight(_text_:o in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062487323 = score(doc=4319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22544876 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: Image and Pattern Recognition: Compression, Image processing, Signal Processing Architectures, Signal Processing for Communication, Signal Processing Implementation, Speech Compression, and Video Coding Architectures. Languages and Systems: Algorithms, Databases, Embedded Systems and Applications, File Systems and I/O, Geographical Information Systems, Kernel and OS Structures, Knowledge Based Systems, Modeling and Simulation, Object Based Software Engineering, Programming Languages, and Programming Models and tools. Parallel Processing: Distributed Scheduling, Multiprocessing, Real-time Systems, Simulation Modeling and Development, and Web Applications. New trends in computing: Computers for People of Special Needs, Fuzzy Inference, Human Computer Interaction, Incremental Learning, Internet-based Computing Models, Machine Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Neural Networks, and Online Decision Support System
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.015219972 = product of:
0.030439943 = sum of:
0.030439943 = product of:
0.060879886 = sum of:
0.060879886 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060879886 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.012175977 = product of:
0.024351954 = sum of:
0.024351954 = product of:
0.04870391 = sum of:
0.04870391 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04870391 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.012175977 = product of:
0.024351954 = sum of:
0.024351954 = product of:
0.04870391 = sum of:
0.04870391 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04870391 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.01065398 = product of:
0.02130796 = sum of:
0.02130796 = product of:
0.04261592 = sum of:
0.04261592 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261592 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.009131983 = product of:
0.018263966 = sum of:
0.018263966 = product of:
0.03652793 = sum of:
0.03652793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03652793 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008)
0.01
0.008609716 = product of:
0.017219432 = sum of:
0.017219432 = product of:
0.034438863 = sum of:
0.034438863 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034438863 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15735255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044934385 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
