-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.34
0.33729967 = product of:
0.6071394 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.31
0.31084433 = product of:
0.55951977 = sum of:
0.031135354 = product of:
0.09340606 = sum of:
0.09340606 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09340606 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.13209611 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13209611 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.009576321 = product of:
0.043093443 = sum of:
0.031141505 = product of:
0.06228301 = sum of:
0.06228301 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06228301 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011951938 = product of:
0.023903877 = sum of:
0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023903877 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014)
0.01
0.0087591475 = product of:
0.039416164 = sum of:
0.027464228 = product of:
0.054928456 = sum of:
0.054928456 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054928456 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011951938 = product of:
0.023903877 = sum of:
0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023903877 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
- Date
- 23. 7.2017 13:49:22
- LCSH
- Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access
- RSWK
- Semantic Web
- Subject
- Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access
Semantic Web
-
Marcondes, C.H.; Costa, L.C da.: ¬A model to represent and process scientific knowledge in biomedical articles with semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.01
0.0060579525 = product of:
0.027260786 = sum of:
0.017300837 = product of:
0.034601673 = sum of:
0.034601673 = weight(_text_:web in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601673 = score(doc=2829,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009959949 = product of:
0.019919898 = sum of:
0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019919898 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization faces the challenge of managing the amount of knowledge available on the Web. Published literature in biomedical sciences is a huge source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be managed through automatic methods. The conventional channel for reporting scientific results is Web electronic publishing. Despite its advances, scientific articles are still published in print formats such as portable document format (PDF). Semantic Web and Linked Data technologies provides new opportunities for communicating, sharing, and integrating scientific knowledge that can overcome the limitations of the current print format. Here is proposed a semantic model of scholarly electronic articles in biomedical sciences that can overcome the limitations of traditional flat records formats. Scientific knowledge consists of claims made throughout article texts, especially when semantic elements such as questions, hypotheses and conclusions are stated. These elements, although having different roles, express relationships between phenomena. Once such knowledge units are extracted and represented with technologies such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and linked data, they may be integrated in reasoning chains. Thereby, the results of scientific research can be published and shared in structured formats, enabling crawling by software agents, semantic retrieval, knowledge reuse, validation of scientific results, and identification of traces of scientific discoveries.
- Date
- 12. 3.2016 13:17:22
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.01
0.005789892 = product of:
0.026054513 = sum of:
0.012110585 = product of:
0.02422117 = sum of:
0.02422117 = weight(_text_:web in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02422117 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013943928 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887857 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.01
0.005789892 = product of:
0.026054513 = sum of:
0.012110585 = product of:
0.02422117 = sum of:
0.02422117 = weight(_text_:web in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02422117 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013943928 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887857 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Mahesh, K.: Highly expressive tagging for knowledge organization in the 21st century (2014)
0.01
0.005542869 = product of:
0.024942912 = sum of:
0.014982964 = product of:
0.029965928 = sum of:
0.029965928 = weight(_text_:web in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029965928 = score(doc=1434,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009959949 = product of:
0.019919898 = sum of:
0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019919898 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization of large-scale content on the Web requires substantial amounts of semantic metadata that is expensive to generate manually. Recent developments in Web technologies have enabled any user to tag documents and other forms of content thereby generating metadata that could help organize knowledge. However, merely adding one or more tags to a document is highly inadequate to capture the aboutness of the document and thereby to support powerful semantic functions such as automatic classification, question answering or true semantic search and retrieval. This is true even when the tags used are labels from a well-designed classification system such as a thesaurus or taxonomy. There is a strong need to develop a semantic tagging mechanism with sufficient expressive power to capture the aboutness of each part of a document or dataset or multimedia content in order to enable applications that can benefit from knowledge organization on the Web. This article proposes a highly expressive mechanism of using ontology snippets as semantic tags that map portions of a document or a part of a dataset or a segment of a multimedia content to concepts and relations in an ontology of the domain(s) of interest.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.005542869 = product of:
0.024942912 = sum of:
0.014982964 = product of:
0.029965928 = sum of:
0.029965928 = weight(_text_:web in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029965928 = score(doc=4553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009959949 = product of:
0.019919898 = sum of:
0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019919898 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Semantic Web knowledge representation standards, and in particular RDF and OWL, often come endowed with a formal semantics which is considered to be of fundamental importance for the field. Reasoning, i.e., the drawing of logical inferences from knowledge expressed in such standards, is traditionally based on logical deductive methods and algorithms which can be proven to be sound and complete and terminating, i.e. correct in a very strong sense. For various reasons, though, in particular the scalability issues arising from the ever increasing amounts of Semantic Web data available and the inability of deductive algorithms to deal with noise in the data, it has been argued that alternative means of reasoning should be investigated which bear high promise for high scalability and better robustness. From this perspective, deductive algorithms can be considered the gold standard regarding correctness against which alternative methods need to be tested. In this paper, we show that it is possible to train a Deep Learning system on RDF knowledge graphs, such that it is able to perform reasoning over new RDF knowledge graphs, with high precision and recall compared to the deductive gold standard.
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015)
0.00
0.004962764 = product of:
0.02233244 = sum of:
0.010380501 = product of:
0.020761002 = sum of:
0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020761002 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011951938 = product of:
0.023903877 = sum of:
0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023903877 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010)
0.00
0.0044045774 = product of:
0.039641198 = sum of:
0.039641198 = product of:
0.079282396 = sum of:
0.079282396 = weight(_text_:web in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079282396 = score(doc=4706,freq=42.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
- RSWK
- Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
- Subject
- Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Lukasiewicz, T.: Uncertainty reasoning for the Semantic Web (2017)
0.00
0.0040368615 = product of:
0.036331754 = sum of:
0.036331754 = product of:
0.07266351 = sum of:
0.07266351 = weight(_text_:web in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07266351 = score(doc=3939,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web has attracted much attention, both from academia and industry. An important role in research towards the Semantic Web is played by formalisms and technologies for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness. In this paper, I first provide some motivating examples for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web. I then give an overview of some own formalisms for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web.
- Series
- Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc;10370) (Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI
- Source
- Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014)
0.00
0.003945509 = product of:
0.01775479 = sum of:
0.009786831 = product of:
0.019573662 = sum of:
0.019573662 = weight(_text_:web in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019573662 = score(doc=1634,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007967959 = product of:
0.015935918 = sum of:
0.015935918 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015935918 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010)
0.00
0.0036231945 = product of:
0.03260875 = sum of:
0.03260875 = product of:
0.0652175 = sum of:
0.0652175 = weight(_text_:web in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0652175 = score(doc=4515,freq=58.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.67960584 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
58.0 = termFreq=58.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.4, S.205-206 (C. Carstens): "Welche Arten der Wissensrepräsentation existieren im Web, wie ausgeprägt sind semantische Strukturen in diesem Kontext, und wie können soziale Aktivitäten im Sinne des Web 2.0 zur Strukturierung von Wissen im Web beitragen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich Wellers Buch mit dem Titel Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web. Der Begriff Social Semantic Web spielt einerseits auf die semantische Strukturierung von Daten im Sinne des Semantic Web an und deutet andererseits auf die zunehmend kollaborative Inhaltserstellung im Social Web hin. Weller greift die Entwicklungen in diesen beiden Bereichen auf und beleuchtet die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die aus der Kombination der Aktivitäten im Semantic Web und im Social Web entstehen. Der Fokus des Buches liegt dabei primär auf den konzeptuellen Herausforderungen, die sich in diesem Kontext ergeben. So strebt die originäre Vision des Semantic Web die Annotation aller Webinhalte mit ausdrucksstarken, hochformalisierten Ontologien an. Im Social Web hingegen werden große Mengen an Daten von Nutzern erstellt, die häufig mithilfe von unkontrollierten Tags in Folksonomies annotiert werden. Weller sieht in derartigen kollaborativ erstellten Inhalten und Annotationen großes Potenzial für die semantische Indexierung, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Retrieval im Web. Das Hauptinteresse des Buches besteht daher darin, eine Brücke zwischen den Wissensrepräsentations-Methoden im Social Web und im Semantic Web zu schlagen. Um dieser Fragestellung nachzugehen, gliedert sich das Buch in drei Teile. . . .
Insgesamt besticht das Buch insbesondere durch seine breite Sichtweise, die Aktualität und die Fülle an Referenzen. Es ist somit sowohl als Überblickswerk geeignet, das umfassend über aktuelle Entwicklungen und Trends der Wissensrepräsentation im Semantic und Social Web informiert, als auch als Lektüre für Experten, für die es vor allem als kontextualisierte und sehr aktuelle Sammlung von Referenzen eine wertvolle Ressource darstellt." Weitere Rez. in: Journal of Documentation. 67(2011), no.5, S.896-899 (P. Rafferty)
- LCSH
- Semantic Web
- Object
- Web 2.0
- RSWK
- Semantic Web
World Wide Web 2.0
- Subject
- Semantic Web
World Wide Web 2.0
Semantic Web
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. (2010)
0.00
0.003523662 = product of:
0.031712957 = sum of:
0.031712957 = product of:
0.06342591 = sum of:
0.06342591 = weight(_text_:web in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06342591 = score(doc=4707,freq=42.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.6609364 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
- RSWK
- Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
- Subject
- Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017)
0.00
0.0031877991 = product of:
0.028690193 = sum of:
0.028690193 = product of:
0.057380386 = sum of:
0.057380386 = weight(_text_:web in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057380386 = score(doc=3934,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- This volume contains the lecture notes of the 13th Reasoning Web Summer School, RW 2017, held in London, UK, in July 2017. In 2017, the theme of the school was "Semantic Interoperability on the Web", which encompasses subjects such as data integration, open data management, reasoning over linked data, database to ontology mapping, query answering over ontologies, hybrid reasoning with rules and ontologies, and ontology-based dynamic systems. The papers of this volume focus on these topics and also address foundational reasoning techniques used in answer set programming and ontologies.
- Content
- Neumaier, Sebastian (et al.): Data Integration for Open Data on the Web - Stamou, Giorgos (et al.): Ontological Query Answering over Semantic Data - Calì, Andrea: Ontology Querying: Datalog Strikes Back - Sequeda, Juan F.: Integrating Relational Databases with the Semantic Web: A Reflection - Rousset, Marie-Christine (et al.): Datalog Revisited for Reasoning in Linked Data - Kaminski, Roland (et al.): A Tutorial on Hybrid Answer Set Solving with clingo - Eiter, Thomas (et al.): Answer Set Programming with External Source Access - Lukasiewicz, Thomas: Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web - Calvanese, Diego (et al.): OBDA for Log Extraction in Process Mining
- RSWK
- Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Semantic Web
- Series
- Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc;10370 )(Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI
- Subject
- Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Semantic Web
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Gómez-Pérez, A.; Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the Semantic Web (2015)
0.00
0.0030394471 = product of:
0.027355025 = sum of:
0.027355025 = product of:
0.05471005 = sum of:
0.05471005 = weight(_text_:web in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05471005 = score(doc=3297,freq=20.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Wright, H.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2018)
0.00
0.0030088993 = product of:
0.027080093 = sum of:
0.027080093 = product of:
0.054160185 = sum of:
0.054160185 = weight(_text_:web in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160185 = score(doc=80,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web and ontologies can help archaeologists combine and share data, making it more open and useful. Archaeologists create diverse types of data, using a wide variety of technologies and methodologies. Like all research domains, these data are increasingly digital. The creation of data that are now openly and persistently available from disparate sources has also inspired efforts to bring archaeological resources together and make them more interoperable. This allows functionality such as federated cross-search across different datasets, and the mapping of heterogeneous data to authoritative structures to build a single data source. Ontologies provide the structure and relationships for Semantic Web data, and have been developed for use in cultural heritage applications generally, and archaeology specifically. A variety of online resources for archaeology now incorporate Semantic Web principles and technologies.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Mahesh, K.; Karanth, P.: ¬A novel knowledge organization scheme for the Web : superlinks with semantic roles (2012)
0.00
0.0028834727 = product of:
0.025951253 = sum of:
0.025951253 = product of:
0.051902507 = sum of:
0.051902507 = weight(_text_:web in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051902507 = score(doc=822,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- We discuss the needs of a knowledge organization scheme for supporting Web-based software applications. We show how it differs from traditional knowledge organization schemes due to the virtual, dynamic, ad-hoc, userspecific and application-specific nature of Web-based knowledge. The sheer size of Web resources also adds to the complexity of organizing knowledge on the Web. As such, a standard, global scheme such as a single ontology for classifying and organizing all Web-based content is unrealistic. There is nevertheless a strong and immediate need for effective knowledge organization schemes to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Web-based applications. In this context, we propose a novel knowledge organization scheme wherein concepts in the ontology of a domain are semantically interlinked with specific pieces of Web-based content using a rich hyper-linking structure known as Superlinks with well-defined semantic roles. We illustrate how such a knowledge organization scheme improves the efficiency and effectiveness of a Web-based e-commerce retail store.
-
Guns, R.: Tracing the origins of the semantic web (2013)
0.00
0.0028834727 = product of:
0.025951253 = sum of:
0.025951253 = product of:
0.051902507 = sum of:
0.051902507 = weight(_text_:web in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051902507 = score(doc=1093,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web has been criticized for not being semantic. This article examines the questions of why and how the Web of Data, expressed in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), has come to be known as the Semantic Web. Contrary to previous papers, we deliberately take a descriptive stance and do not start from preconceived ideas about the nature of semantics. Instead, we mainly base our analysis on early design documents of the (Semantic) Web. The main determining factor is shown to be link typing, coupled with the influence of online metadata. Both factors already were present in early web standards and drafts. Our findings indicate that the Semantic Web is directly linked to older artificial intelligence work, despite occasional claims to the contrary. Because of link typing, the Semantic Web can be considered an example of a semantic network. Originally network representations of the meaning of natural language utterances, semantic networks have eventually come to refer to any networks with typed (usually directed) links. We discuss possible causes for this shift and suggest that it may be due to confounding paradigmatic and syntagmatic semantic relations.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
