Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.026893275 = product of:
  0.05378655 = sum of:
    0.05378655 = product of:
      0.1075731 = sum of:
        0.1075731 = weight(_text_:networks in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1075731 = score(doc=1205,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051289067 = queryNorm
            0.44343 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Detecting science-technology hierarchical linkages is beneficial for understanding deep interactions between science and technology (S&T). Previous studies have mainly focused on linear linkages between S&T but ignored their structural linkages. In this paper, we propose a network coupling approach to inspect hierarchical interactions of S&T by integrating their knowledge linkages and structural linkages. S&T knowledge networks are first enhanced with bidirectional encoder representation from transformers (BERT) knowledge alignment, and then their hierarchical structures are identified based on K-core decomposition. Hierarchical coupling preferences and strengths of the S&T networks over time are further calculated based on similarities of coupling nodes' degree distribution and similarities of coupling edges' weight distribution. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach is feasible and robust in identifying the coupling hierarchy with superior performance compared to other isomorphism and dissimilarity algorithms. Our research extends the mindset of S&T linkage measurement by identifying patterns and paths of the interaction of S&T hierarchical knowledge.

0.019016415 = product of:
  0.03803283 = sum of:
    0.03803283 = product of:
      0.07606566 = sum of:
        0.07606566 = weight(_text_:networks in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07606566 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051289067 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Knowledge network construction (KNC) is the essence of dynamic knowledge architecture, and is helpful to illustrate ubiquitous knowledge service in digital libraries (DLs). The authors explore its theoretical foundations and basic rules to elucidate the basic principles of KNC in DLs. The results indicate that world general connection, small-world phenomenon, relevance theory, unity and continuity of science development have been the production tool, architecture aim and scientific foundation of KNC in DLs. By analyzing both the characteristics of KNC based on different types of knowledge linking and the relationships between different forms of knowledge and the appropriate ways of knowledge linking, the basic principle of KNC is summarized as follows: let each kind of knowledge linking form each shows its ability, each kind of knowledge manifestation each answer the purpose intended in practice, and then subjective knowledge network and objective knowledge network are organically combined. This will lay a solid theoretical foundation and provide an action guide for DLs to construct knowledge networks.

0.015847012 = product of:
  0.031694025 = sum of:
    0.031694025 = product of:
      0.06338805 = sum of:
        0.06338805 = weight(_text_:networks in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06338805 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051289067 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.

0.008686201 = product of:
  0.017372401 = sum of:
    0.017372401 = product of:
      0.034744803 = sum of:
        0.034744803 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034744803 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051289067 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2021 14:24:32

0.0069489605 = product of:
  0.013897921 = sum of:
    0.013897921 = product of:
      0.027795842 = sum of:
        0.027795842 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027795842 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051289067 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22