-
Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo : a Web-Scale interface for ontology archiving under consumer-oriented aspects (2020)
0.01
0.0139334975 = product of:
0.027866995 = sum of:
0.027866995 = product of:
0.05573399 = sum of:
0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05573399 = score(doc=52,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Semantic metadata annotation : tagging Medline abstracts for enhanced information access (2010)
0.01
0.013790587 = product of:
0.027581174 = sum of:
0.027581174 = product of:
0.055162348 = sum of:
0.055162348 = weight(_text_:f in 3949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055162348 = score(doc=3949,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.3050982 = fieldWeight in 3949, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The object of this study is to develop methods for automatically annotating the argumentative role of sentences in scientific abstracts. Working from Medline abstracts, sentences were classified into four major argumentative roles: objective, method, result, and conclusion. The idea is that, if the role of each sentence can be marked up, then these metadata can be used during information retrieval to seek particular types of information such as novelty, conclusions, methodologies, aims/goals of a scientific piece of work. Design/methodology/approach - Two approaches were tested: linguistic cues and positional heuristics. Linguistic cues are lexico-syntactic patterns modelled as regular expressions implemented in a linguistic parser. Positional heuristics make use of the relative position of a sentence in the abstract to deduce its argumentative class. Findings - The experiments showed that positional heuristics attained a much higher degree of accuracy on Medline abstracts with an F-score of 64 per cent, whereas the linguistic cues only attained an F-score of 12 per cent. This is mostly because sentences from different argumentative roles are not always announced by surface linguistic cues. Research limitations/implications - A limitation to the study was the inability to test other methods to perform this task such as machine learning techniques which have been reported to perform better on Medline abstracts. Also, to compare the results of the study with earlier studies using Medline abstracts, the different argumentative roles present in Medline had to be mapped on to four major argumentative roles. This may have favourably biased the performance of the sentence classification by positional heuristics. Originality/value - To the best of one's knowledge, this study presents the first instance of evaluating linguistic cues and positional heuristics on the same corpus.
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.01
0.013037384 = product of:
0.026074767 = sum of:
0.026074767 = product of:
0.052149534 = sum of:
0.052149534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052149534 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.012291762 = product of:
0.024583524 = sum of:
0.024583524 = product of:
0.04916705 = sum of:
0.04916705 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04916705 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.012291762 = product of:
0.024583524 = sum of:
0.024583524 = product of:
0.04916705 = sum of:
0.04916705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04916705 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fonseca, F.: ¬The double role of ontologies in information science research (2007)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Girju, R.; Beamer, B.; Rozovskaya, A.; Fister, A.; Bhat, S.: ¬A knowledge-rich approach to identifying semantic relations between nominals (2010)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a state-of-the-art supervised, knowledge-intensive approach to the automatic identification of semantic relations between nominals in English sentences. The system employs a combination of rich and varied sets of new and previously used lexical, syntactic, and semantic features extracted from various knowledge sources such as WordNet and additional annotated corpora. The system ranked first at the third most popular SemEval 2007 Task - Classification of Semantic Relations between Nominals and achieved an F-measure of 72.4% and an accuracy of 76.3%. We also show that some semantic relations are better suited for WordNet-based models than other relations. Additionally, we make a distinction between out-of-context (regular) examples and those that require sentence context for relation identification and show that contextual data are important for the performance of a noun-noun semantic parser. Finally, learning curves show that the task difficulty varies across relations and that our learned WordNet-based representation is highly accurate so the performance results suggest the upper bound on what this representation can do.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- McGuinness, D.L. u. F. van Harmelen
-
Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.; McCusker, J.P.; McGuinness, D.L.; Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity in linked data (2010)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al
-
Uren, V.; Cimiano, P.; Iria, J.; Handschuh, S.; Vargas-Vera, M.; Motta, E.; Ciravegnac, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management : requirements and a survey of the state of the art (2006)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sartori, F.; Grazioli, L.: Metadata guiding kowledge engineering : a practical approach (2014)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=1572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Amarger, F.; Chanet, J.-P.; Haemmerlé, O.; Hernandez, N.; Roussey, C.: SKOS sources transformations for ontology engineering : agronomical taxonomy use case (2014)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
El idrissi esserhrouchni, O. et al.; Frikh, B.; Ouhbi, B.: OntologyLine : a new framework for learning non-taxonomic relations of domain ontology (2016)
0.01
0.011942998 = product of:
0.023885995 = sum of:
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Domain Ontology learning has been introduced as a technology that aims at reducing the bottleneck of knowledge acquisition in the construction of domain ontologies. However, the discovery and the labelling of non-taxonomic relations have been identified as one of the most difficult problems in this learning process. In this paper, we propose OntologyLine, a new system for discovering non-taxonomic relations and building domain ontology from scratch. The proposed system is based on adapting Open Information Extraction algorithms to extract and label relations between domain concepts. OntologyLine was tested in two different domains: the financial and cancer domains. It was evaluated against gold standard ontology and was compared to state-of-the-art ontology learning algorithm. The experimental results show that OntologyLine is more effective for acquiring non-taxonomic relations and gives better results in terms of precision, recall and F-measure.
-
Stuckenschmidt, H.; Harmelen, F van; Waard, A. de; Scerri, T.; Bhogal, R.; Buel, J. van; Crowlesmith, I.; Fluit, C.; Kampman, A.; Broekstra, J.; Mulligen, E. van: Exploring large document repositories with RDF technology : the DOPE project (2004)
0.01
0.0112599665 = product of:
0.022519933 = sum of:
0.022519933 = product of:
0.045039866 = sum of:
0.045039866 = weight(_text_:f in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045039866 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.24911162 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: Waard, A. de, C. Fluit u. F. van Harmelen: Drug Ontology Project for Elsevier (DOPE). In: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/Elsevier/Elsevier_Aduna_VU.pdf.
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
