-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016)
0.04
0.03726713 = product of:
0.07453426 = sum of:
0.07453426 = product of:
0.14906852 = sum of:
0.14906852 = weight(_text_:light in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14906852 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
-
Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.; McCusker, J.P.; McGuinness, D.L.; Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity in linked data (2010)
0.03
0.027950348 = product of:
0.055900697 = sum of:
0.055900697 = product of:
0.11180139 = sum of:
0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11180139 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In Linked Data, the use of owl:sameAs is ubiquitous in interlinking data-sets. There is however, ongoing discussion about its use, and potential misuse, particularly with regards to interactions with inference. In fact, owl:sameAs can be viewed as encoding only one point on a scale of similarity, one that is often too strong for many of its current uses. We describe how referentially opaque contexts that do not allow inference exist, and then outline some varieties of referentially-opaque alternatives to owl:sameAs. Finally, we report on an empirical experiment over randomly selected owl:sameAs statements from the Web of data. This theoretical apparatus and experiment shed light upon how owl:sameAs is being used (and misused) on the Web of data.
-
Genetasio, G.: ¬The International Cataloguing Principles and their future", in: JLIS.it 3/1 (2012) (2012)
0.03
0.027950348 = product of:
0.055900697 = sum of:
0.055900697 = product of:
0.11180139 = sum of:
0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11180139 = score(doc=2625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article aims to provide an update on the 2009 Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and on the status of work on the Statement by the IFLA Cataloguing Section. The article begins with a summary of the drafting process of the ICP by the IME ICC, International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, focusing in particular on the first meeting (IME ICC1) and on the earlier drafts of the 2009 Statement. It then analyzes both the major innovations and the unsatisfactory aspects of the ICP. Finally, it explains and comments on the recent documents by the IFLA Cataloguing Section relating to the ICP, which express their intention to revise the Statement and to verify the convenience of drawing up an international cataloguing code. The latter intention is considered in detail and criticized by the author in the light of the recent publication of the RDA, Resource Description and Access. The article is complemented by an updated bibliography on the ICP.
-
Lamb, I.; Larson, C.: Shining a light on scientific data : building a data catalog to foster data sharing and reuse (2016)
0.03
0.027950348 = product of:
0.055900697 = sum of:
0.055900697 = product of:
0.11180139 = sum of:
0.11180139 = weight(_text_:light in 3195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11180139 = score(doc=3195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 3195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3195)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015)
0.02
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = product of:
0.068507105 = sum of:
0.068507105 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068507105 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 12:51:57
-
Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011)
0.02
0.016954644 = product of:
0.033909287 = sum of:
0.033909287 = product of:
0.067818575 = sum of:
0.067818575 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067818575 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 13:00:42
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.01
0.014532552 = product of:
0.029065104 = sum of:
0.029065104 = product of:
0.05813021 = sum of:
0.05813021 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05813021 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = product of:
0.054805685 = sum of:
0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054805685 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011)
0.01
0.010276065 = product of:
0.02055213 = sum of:
0.02055213 = product of:
0.04110426 = sum of:
0.04110426 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04110426 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 12:53:49
-
Dowding, H.; Gengenbach, M.; Graham, B.; Meister, S.; Moran, J.; Peltzman, S.; Seifert, J.; Waugh, D.: OSS4EVA: using open-source tools to fulfill digital preservation requirements (2016)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.10.2016 18:22:33
-
Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10.11.2018 16:27:22
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.01
0.008563388 = product of:
0.017126776 = sum of:
0.017126776 = product of:
0.034253553 = sum of:
0.034253553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034253553 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.01
0.0068507106 = product of:
0.013701421 = sum of:
0.013701421 = product of:
0.027402842 = sum of:
0.027402842 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027402842 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050563898 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
