Search (289 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.04
    0.0410558 = product of:
      0.0821116 = sum of:
        0.0821116 = sum of:
          0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007219314 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.07489228 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07489228 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.04
    0.03658085 = product of:
      0.0731617 = sum of:
        0.0731617 = product of:
          0.2926468 = sum of:
            0.2926468 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2926468 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39053032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.023949215 = product of:
      0.04789843 = sum of:
        0.04789843 = sum of:
          0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0042112665 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043687165 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.02206535 = product of:
      0.0441307 = sum of:
        0.0441307 = product of:
          0.0882614 = sum of:
            0.0882614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0882614 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.021843582 = product of:
      0.043687165 = sum of:
        0.043687165 = product of:
          0.08737433 = sum of:
            0.08737433 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08737433 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  6. Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011) 0.02
    0.021275483 = product of:
      0.042550966 = sum of:
        0.042550966 = sum of:
          0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0051048263 = score(doc=3449,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Two new methods for retrieving mathematical expressions using conventional keyword search and expression images are presented. An expression-level TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency) approach is used for keyword search, where queries and indexed expressions are represented by keywords taken from LATEX strings. TF-IDF is computed at the level of individual expressions rather than documents to increase the precision of matching. The second retrieval technique is a form of Content-Base Image Retrieval (CBIR). Expressions are segmented into connected components, and then components in the query expression and each expression in the collection are matched using contour and density features, aspect ratios, and relative positions. In an experiment using ten randomly sampled queries from a corpus of over 22,000 expressions, precision-at-k (k= 20) for the keyword-based approach was higher (keyword: µ= 84.0,s= 19.0, image-based:µ= 32.0,s= 30.7), but for a few of the queries better results were obtained using a combination of the two techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:53:49
  7. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  8. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  9. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
    Source
    Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.25-47
  10. Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  11. Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 1.2022 10:22:18
  12. Dowding, H.; Gengenbach, M.; Graham, B.; Meister, S.; Moran, J.; Peltzman, S.; Seifert, J.; Waugh, D.: OSS4EVA: using open-source tools to fulfill digital preservation requirements (2016) 0.02
    0.017729571 = product of:
      0.035459142 = sum of:
        0.035459142 = sum of:
          0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0042540217 = score(doc=3200,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
          0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03120512 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.10.2016 18:22:33
  13. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.02
    0.017106583 = product of:
      0.034213167 = sum of:
        0.034213167 = sum of:
          0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0030080476 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03120512 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  14. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02
    0.01560256 = product of:
      0.03120512 = sum of:
        0.03120512 = product of:
          0.06241024 = sum of:
            0.06241024 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06241024 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  15. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.0154457465 = product of:
      0.030891493 = sum of:
        0.030891493 = product of:
          0.061782986 = sum of:
            0.061782986 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061782986 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
  16. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.01
    0.0136852665 = product of:
      0.027370533 = sum of:
        0.027370533 = sum of:
          0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002406438 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.024964094 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024964094 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 6(2000) no.10, xx S
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01
    0.013239211 = product of:
      0.026478423 = sum of:
        0.026478423 = product of:
          0.052956846 = sum of:
            0.052956846 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052956846 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.012482047 = product of:
      0.024964094 = sum of:
        0.024964094 = product of:
          0.04992819 = sum of:
            0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992819 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  19. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.01
    0.011032675 = product of:
      0.02206535 = sum of:
        0.02206535 = product of:
          0.0441307 = sum of:
            0.0441307 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0441307 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  20. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.010921791 = product of:
      0.021843582 = sum of:
        0.021843582 = product of:
          0.043687165 = sum of:
            0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687165 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18