Search (437 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.30
    0.3025334 = product of:
      1.0084445 = sum of:
        0.045678046 = product of:
          0.13703413 = sum of:
            0.13703413 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13703413 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.3 = coord(9/30)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Aytac, S.; Slutsky, B.: Published librarian research, 2008 through 2012 : analyses and perspectives (2014) 0.04
    0.035207275 = product of:
      0.17603637 = sum of:
        0.023677567 = product of:
          0.047355134 = sum of:
            0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047355134 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048359692 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048359692 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
        0.0048793326 = weight(_text_:s in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048793326 = score(doc=2507,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Content
    Vgl. dazu auch: Coates, H.L.: Library and information science research literature is chiefly descriptive and relies heavily on survey and content analysis methods. In: Evidence based library and information practice. 10/2015) no.4, S.215-217.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Collaborative librarianship. 6(2014) no.4, S.147-159
  3. Kraker, P.; Kittel, C,; Enkhbayar, A.: Open Knowledge Maps : creating a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge based on natural language processing (2016) 0.02
    0.016287295 = product of:
      0.08143648 = sum of:
        0.0070240153 = weight(_text_:und in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070240153 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=3205,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.0070240153 = weight(_text_:und in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070240153 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of Open Knowledge Maps is to create a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge. The base for this visual interface consists of so-called knowledge maps, which enable the exploration of existing knowledge and the discovery of new knowledge. Our open source knowledge mapping software applies a mixture of summarization techniques and similarity measures on article metadata, which are iteratively chained together. After processing, the representation is saved in a database for use in a web visualization. In the future, we want to create a space for collective knowledge mapping that brings together individuals and communities involved in exploration and discovery. We want to enable people to guide each other in their discovery by collaboratively annotating and modifying the automatically created maps.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenschwerpunkt 'Computerlinguistik und Bibliotheken'. Vgl.: http://0277.ch/ojs/index.php/cdrs_0277/article/view/157/355.
  4. Hyning, V. Van; Lintott, C.; Blickhan, S.; Trouille, L.: Transforming libraries and archives through crowdsourcing (2017) 0.01
    0.014694725 = product of:
      0.073473625 = sum of:
        0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026457112 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002390375 = score(doc=2526,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    This article will showcase the aims and research goals of the project entitled "Transforming Libraries and Archives through Crowdsourcing", recipient of a 2016 Institute for Museum and Library Services grant. This grant will be used to fund the creation of four bespoke text and audio transcription projects which will be hosted on the Zooniverse, the world-leading research crowdsourcing platform. These transcription projects, while supporting the research of four separate institutions, will also function as a means to expand and enhance the Zooniverse platform to better support galleries, libraries, archives and museums (GLAM institutions) in unlocking their data and engaging the public through crowdsourcing.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 23(2017) nos.5/6, xx S
  5. Coates, H.L.: Library and information science research literature is chiefly descriptive and relies heavily on survey and content analysis methods (2015) 0.01
    0.0141574 = product of:
      0.070787 = sum of:
        0.009471027 = product of:
          0.018942054 = sum of:
            0.018942054 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018942054 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.19700313 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019343877 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019343877 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1990817 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
        0.018942054 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018942054 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19700313 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
        0.018942054 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018942054 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19700313 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
        0.0024944006 = weight(_text_:in in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024944006 = score(doc=2508,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08501591 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
        0.0015935833 = weight(_text_:s in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015935833 = score(doc=2508,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    Objective - To compare the research articles produced by library and information science (LIS) practitioners, LIS academics, and collaborations between practitioners and academics. Design - Content analysis. Setting - English-language LIS literature from 2008 through 2012. Subjects - Research articles published in 13 library and information science journals. Methods - Using a purposive sample of 769 articles from selected journals, the authors used content analysis to characterize the mix of authorship models, author status (practitioner, academic, or student), topic, research approach and methods, and data analysis techniques used by LIS practitioners and academics. Main Results - The authors screened 1,778 articles, 769 (43%) of which were determined to be research articles. Of these, 438 (57%) were written solely by practitioners, 110 (14%) collaboratively by practitioners and academics, 205 (27%) solely by academics, and 16 (2%) by others. The majority of the articles were descriptive (74%) and gathered quantitative data (69%). The range of topics was more varied; the most popular topics were libraries and librarianship (19%), library users/information seeking (13%), medical information/research (13%), and reference services (12%). Pearson's chi-squared tests detected significant differences in research and statistical approaches by authorship groups. Conclusion - Further examination of practitioner research is a worthwhile effort as is establishing new funding to support practitioner and academic collaborations. The use of purposive sampling limits the generalizability of the results, particularly to international and non-English LIS literature. Future studies could explore motivators for practitioner-academic collaborations as well as the skills necessary for successful collaboration. Additional support for practitioner research could include mentorship for early career librarians to facilitate more rapid maturation of collaborative research skills and increase the methodological quality of published research.
    Content
    A Review of: Aytac, S. & Slutsky, B. (2014). Published librarian research, 2008 through 2012: Analyses and perspectives. Collaborative Librarianship, 6(4), 147-159. Vgl.: https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/25480.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Evidence based library and information practice. 10/2015) no.4, S.215-217
  6. Gore, E.; Bitta, M.D.; Cohen, D.: ¬The Digital Public Library of America and the National Digital Platform (2017) 0.01
    0.011196761 = product of:
      0.06718057 = sum of:
        0.0045825066 = weight(_text_:in in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045825066 = score(doc=3655,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020302603 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Digital Public Library of America brings together the riches of America's libraries, archives, and museums, and makes them freely available to the world. In order to do this, DPLA has had to build elements of the national digital platform to connect to those institutions and to serve their digitized materials to audiences. In this article, we detail the construction of two critical elements of our work: the decentralized national network of "hubs," which operate in states across the country; and a version of the Hydra repository software that is tailored to the needs of our community. This technology and the organizations that make use of it serve as the foundation of the future of DPLA and other projects that seek to take advantage of the national digital platform.
    Area
    Öffentliche Bibliotheken
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 23(2017) nos.5/6, xx S
  7. Patriarca, S.: Information literacy gives us the tools to check sources and to verify factual statements : What does Popper`s "Es gibt keine Autoritäten" mean? (2021) 0.01
    0.008223645 = product of:
      0.04934187 = sum of:
        0.008277881 = weight(_text_:und in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008277881 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
        0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024179846 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
        0.006614278 = weight(_text_:in in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006614278 = score(doc=331,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
        0.008277881 = weight(_text_:und in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008277881 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
        0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001991979 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    I wonder if you would consider an English perspective on the exchange between Bernd Jörs and Hermann Huemer. In my career in the independent education sector I can recall many discussions and Government reports about cross-curricular issues such as logical reasoning and critical thinking, In the IB system this led to the inclusion in the Diploma of "Theory of Knowledge." In the UK we had "key skills" and "critical thinking." One such key skill is what we now call "information literacy." "In his parody of Information literacy, Dr Jörs seems to have confused a necessary condition for a sufficient condition. The fact that information competence may be necessary for serious academic study does not of course make it sufficient. When that is understood the joke about the megalomaniac rather loses its force. (We had better pass over the rant which follows, the sneer at "earth sciences" and the German prejudice towards Austrians)."
    Content
    Zu: Bernd Jörs, Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft und Kritischer Rationalismus - Gegen die Selbstüberschätzung der Vertreter der "Informationskompetenz" eine Rückkehr zu Karl R. Popper geboten, in: Open Password, 30 August - Herbert Huemer, Informationskompetenz als Kompetenz für lebenslanges Lernen, in: Open Password, #965, 25. August 2021 - Huemer nahm auf den Beitrag von Bernd Jörs "Wie sich "Informationskompetenz" methodisch-operativ untersuchen lässt" in Open Password am 20. August 2021 Bezug.
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Erwiderung: Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz ist auf domänenspezifisches Vorwissen angewiesen und kann immer nur vorläufig sein: eine Antwort auf Steve Patriarca. Unter: Open Password. 2021, Nr.998 vom 15. November 2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NiwiYTRlYWIxNTJhOTU4IiwwLDAsMzM5LDFd].
  8. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01
    0.0065348013 = product of:
      0.049011007 = sum of:
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
        0.017534448 = product of:
          0.035068896 = sum of:
            0.035068896 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035068896 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Junger, U.: Can indexing be automated? : the example of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (2012) 0.01
    0.00589499 = product of:
      0.058949903 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.05261274 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05261274 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.5165134 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file (Schlagwortnormdatei/SWD) provides a broad controlled vocabulary for indexing documents of all subjects. Traditionally used for intellectual subject cataloguing primarily of books the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB, German National Library) has been working on developping and implementing procedures for automated assignment of subject headings for online publications. This project, its results and problems are sketched in the paper.
    Content
    Beitrag für die Tagung: Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn. Vgl.: http://http://www.nlib.ee/index.php?id=17763.
    Source
    Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly 52(2014) no.1, S.102-109
  10. Brahms, E.: Digital library initiatives of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2001) 0.01
    0.005378678 = product of:
      0.05378678 = sum of:
        0.0069998945 = weight(_text_:in in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069998945 = score(doc=1190,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
        0.045096636 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045096636 = score(doc=1190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.44272578 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is the central public funding organization for academic research in Germany. It is thus comparable to a research council or a national research foundation. According to its statutes, DFG's mandate is to serve science and the arts in all fields by supporting research projects carried out at universities and public research institutions in Germany, to promote cooperation between researchers, and to forge and support links between German academic science, industry and partners in foreign countries. In the fulfillment of its tasks, the DFG pays special attention to the education and support of young scientists and scholars. DFG's mandate and operations follow the principle of territoriality. This means that its funding activities are restricted, with very few exceptions, to individuals and institutions with permanent addresses in Germany. Fellowships are granted for work in other countries, but most fellowship programs are restricted to German citizens, with a few exceptions for permanent residents of Germany holding foreign passports.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 7(2001) no.5, xx S
  11. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00
    0.0049626124 = product of:
      0.029775674 = sum of:
        0.0035120076 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035120076 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.0056124018 = weight(_text_:in in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0056124018 = score(doc=1195,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1912858 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.0035120076 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035120076 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.01594407 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01594407 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1565272 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.0011951874 = weight(_text_:s in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011951874 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.050964262 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 10(2004) no.4, x S
  12. Stewart, A.: Sociohistorical recommendations for the reclassification of pentecostalism in the Dewey Decimal Classification system (2019) 0.00
    0.004582509 = product of:
      0.034368817 = sum of:
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=5323,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.0045825066 = weight(_text_:in in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045825066 = score(doc=5323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=5323,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird zum einen erläutert, wie die Pfingstbewegung in den neun gedruckten Ausgaben der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, die diesen Begriff im Register aufführen, jeweils behandelt wird - beginnend mit der 15. Auflage von 1951 bis zur jüngsten, der 23. Auflage von 2011. Es werden Probleme mit der Charakterisierung der Pfingstbewegung herausgearbeitet - insbesondere, dass sie als ein Amerika-zentriertes und rassisch homogenes Phänomen dargestellt wird. Dies verhindert eine soziohistorisch akkurate Repräsentation der Pfingstbewegung als einer geografisch und rassisch vielfältigen religiösen Tradition innerhalb von Bibliotheksbeständen, die nach der weltweit am meisten verbreiteten Klassifikation organisiert sind. Zum anderen werden Empfehlungen zur Reklassifikation der Pfingstbewegung in der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation gegeben, die zu einer korrekteren soziohistorischen Repräsentation beitragen und dadurch auch den Zugang zur großen Bandbreite von Literatur über diese globale und diverse religiöse Tradition verbessern würden.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 6(2019) Nr.1, S.42-59
  13. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.00
    0.004498896 = product of:
      0.03374172 = sum of:
        0.011648012 = weight(_text_:und in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011648012 = score(doc=405,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24364883 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
        0.0060620857 = weight(_text_:in in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060620857 = score(doc=405,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20661226 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
        0.011648012 = weight(_text_:und in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011648012 = score(doc=405,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24364883 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
        0.004383612 = product of:
          0.008767224 = sum of:
            0.008767224 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008767224 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Human brain size nearly quadrupled in the six million years since Homo last shared a common ancestor with chimpanzees, but human brains are thought to have decreased in volume since the end of the last Ice Age. The timing and reason for this decrease is enigmatic. Here we use change-point analysis to estimate the timing of changes in the rate of hominin brain evolution. We find that hominin brains experienced positive rate changes at 2.1 and 1.5 million years ago, coincident with the early evolution of Homo and technological innovations evident in the archeological record. But we also find that human brain size reduction was surprisingly recent, occurring in the last 3,000 years. Our dating does not support hypotheses concerning brain size reduction as a by-product of body size reduction, a result of a shift to an agricultural diet, or a consequence of self-domestication. We suggest our analysis supports the hypothesis that the recent decrease in brain size may instead result from the externalization of knowledge and advantages of group-level decision-making due in part to the advent of social systems of distributed cognition and the storage and sharing of information. Humans live in social groups in which multiple brains contribute to the emergence of collective intelligence. Although difficult to study in the deep history of Homo, the impacts of group size, social organization, collective intelligence and other potential selective forces on brain evolution can be elucidated using ants as models. The remarkable ecological diversity of ants and their species richness encompasses forms convergent in aspects of human sociality, including large group size, agrarian life histories, division of labor, and collective cognition. Ants provide a wide range of social systems to generate and test hypotheses concerning brain size enlargement or reduction and aid in interpreting patterns of brain evolution identified in humans. Although humans and ants represent very different routes in social and cognitive evolution, the insights ants offer can broadly inform us of the selective forces that influence brain size.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Rötzer, F.: Warum schrumpft das Gehirn des Menschen seit ein paar Tausend Jahren? Unter: https://krass-und-konkret.de/wissenschaft-technik/warum-schrumpft-das-gehirn-des-menschen-seit-ein-paar-tausend-jahren/. "... seit einigen tausend Jahren - manche sagen seit 10.000 Jahren -, also nach dem Beginn der Landwirtschaft, der Sesshaftigkeit und der Stadtgründungen sowie der Erfindung der Schrift schrumpfte das menschliche Gehirn überraschenderweise wieder. ... Allgemein wird davon ausgegangen, dass mit den ersten Werkzeugen und vor allem beginnend mit der Erfindung der Schrift kognitive Funktionen, vor allem das Gedächtnis externalisiert wurden, allerdings um den Preis, neue Kapazitäten entwickeln zu müssen, beispielsweise Lesen und Schreiben. Gedächtnis beinhaltet individuelle Erfahrungen, aber auch kollektives Wissen, an dem alle Mitglieder einer Gemeinschaft mitwirken und in das das Wissen sowie die Erfahrungen der Vorfahren eingeschrieben sind. Im digitalen Zeitalter ist die Externalisierung und Entlastung der Gehirne noch sehr viel weitgehender, weil etwa mit KI nicht nur Wissensinhalte, sondern auch kognitive Fähigkeiten wie das Suchen, Sammeln, Analysieren und Auswerten von Informationen zur Entscheidungsfindung externalisiert werden, während die externalisierten Gehirne wie das Internet kollektiv in Echtzeit lernen und sich erweitern. Über Neuimplantate könnten schließlich Menschen direkt an die externalisierten Gehirne angeschlossen werden, aber auch direkt ihre kognitiven Kapazitäten erweitern, indem Prothesen, neue Sensoren oder Maschinen/Roboter auch in der Ferne in den ergänzten Körper der Gehirne aufgenommen werden.
    Die Wissenschaftler sehen diese Entwicklungen im Hintergrund, wollen aber über einen Vergleich mit der Hirnentwicklung bei Ameisen erklären, warum heutige Menschen kleinere Gehirne als ihre Vorfahren vor 100.000 Jahren entwickelt haben. Der Rückgang der Gehirngröße könnte, so die Hypothese, "aus der Externalisierung von Wissen und den Vorteilen der Entscheidungsfindung auf Gruppenebene resultieren, was zum Teil auf das Aufkommen sozialer Systeme der verteilten Kognition und der Speicherung und Weitergabe von Informationen zurückzuführen ist"."
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]
  14. Gorman, M.: Revisiting enduring values (2015) 0.00
    0.00397804 = product of:
      0.0397804 = sum of:
        0.030909384 = weight(_text_:buch in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030909384 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=2943,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
        0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002390375 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the nature of values in general and the nature and utility of the values of librarianship. Delineates the changes that have occurred and are occurring in the wider world and the nature of change; also the importance of values in providing a framework for dealing with present and future change. Stresses the centrality of the human record to societal progress, the place of the human record in cultural heritage, and the central purpose of libraries in facilitating interaction with the human record and furthering the transmission of cultural heritage. Urges a turning away from the alien value systems of information technology, consumerism, materialism, and corporate management, and a consequent set of alliances between libraries and a wide range of cultural institutions and associations.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf das Buch: Gorman, M.: Our enduring values: librarianship in the 21st century. Chicago [u.a.] ; American Library Ass. ; 2000 ; IX, 188 S.
    Source
    Jlis.it. 6(2015) no.2, S.13-33
  15. Pacek, Z.M.: Cataloguing and presentation tools for old maps and map series (2019) 0.00
    0.0038952068 = product of:
      0.038952067 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Einblick in Katalogisierungspraxis und Erschließungshilfen von Karten.
  16. Hill, L.: New Protocols for Gazetteer and Thesaurus Services (2002) 0.00
    0.0034410476 = product of:
      0.020646285 = sum of:
        0.004682677 = weight(_text_:und in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004682677 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
        0.0030550044 = weight(_text_:in in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030550044 = score(doc=1206,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1041228 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
        0.007099094 = product of:
          0.021297282 = sum of:
            0.021297282 = weight(_text_:l in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021297282 = score(doc=1206,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.24841578 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.004682677 = weight(_text_:und in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004682677 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library Project announces the online publication of two protocols to support querying and response interactions using distributed services: one for gazetteers and one for thesauri. These protocols have been developed for our own purposes and also to support the general interoperability of gazetteers and thesauri on the web. See <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/gazetteer/> and <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/thesaurus/>. For the gazetteer protocol, we have provided a page of test forms that can be used to experiment with the operational functions of the protocol in accessing two gazetteers: the ADL Gazetteer and the ESRI Gazetteer (ESRI has participated in the development of the gazetteer protocol). We are in the process of developing a thesaurus server and a simple client to demonstrate the use of the thesaurus protocol. We are soliciting comments on both protocols. Please remember that we are seeking protocols that are essentially "simple" and easy to implement and that support basic operations - they should not duplicate all of the functions of specialized gazetteer and thesaurus interfaces. We continue to discuss ways of handling various issues and to further develop the protocols. For the thesaurus protocol, outstanding issues include the treatment of multilingual thesauri and the degree to which the language attribute should be supported; whether the Scope Note element should be changed to a repeatable Note element; the best way to handle the hierarchical report for multi-hierarchies where portions of the hierarchy are repeated; and whether support for searching by term identifiers is redundant and unnecessary given that the terms themselves are unique within a thesaurus. For the gazetteer protocol, we continue to work on validation of query and report XML documents and on implementing the part of the protocol designed to support the submission of new entries to a gazetteer. We would like to encourage open discussion of these protocols through the NKOS discussion list (see the NKOS webpage at <http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/>) and the CGGR-L discussion list that focuses on gazetteer development (see ADL Gazetteer Development page at <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer>).
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 8(2002) no.3, x S
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.00
    0.00326992 = product of:
      0.024524398 = sum of:
        0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008194685 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=4644,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008194685 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.0027887707 = weight(_text_:s in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027887707 = score(doc=4644,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a method for converting existing thesauri and related resources from their native format to RDF(S) and OWL. The method identifies four steps in the conversion process. In each step, decisions have to be taken with respect to the syntax or semantics of the resulting representation. Each step is supported through a number of guidelines. The method is illustrated through conversions of two large thesauri: MeSH and WordNet.
    Pages
    S.17-31
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; no.3298
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  18. Rusch-Feja, D.; Becker, H.J.: Global Info : the German digital libraries project (1999) 0.00
    0.0030273579 = product of:
      0.030273579 = sum of:
        0.007887987 = weight(_text_:in in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007887987 = score(doc=1242,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
        0.021258758 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021258758 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20870294 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
        0.0011268335 = weight(_text_:s in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011268335 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The concept for the German Digital Libraries Program is imbedded in the Information Infrastructure Program of the German Federal Government for the years 1996-2000 which has been explicated in the Program Paper entitled "Information as Raw Material for Innovation".3 The Program Paper was published 1996 by the Federal Ministry for Education, Research, and Technology. The actual grants program "Global Info" was initiated by the Information and Communication Commission of the Joint Learned Societies to further technological advancement in enabling all researchers in Germany direct access to literature, research results, and other relevant information. This Commission was founded by four of the learned societies in 1995, and it has sponsored a series of workshops to increase awareness of leading edge technology and innovations in accessing electronic information sources. Now, nine of the leading research-level learned societies -- often those with umbrella responsibilities for other learned societies in their field -- are members of the Information and Communication Commission and represent the mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, chemists, educational researchers, sociologists, psychologists, biologists and information technologists in the German Association of Engineers. (The German professional librarian societies are not members, as such, of this Commission, but are represented through delegates from libraries in the learned societies and in the future, hopefully, also by the German Association of Documentalists or through the cooperation between the documentalist and librarian professional societies.) The Federal Ministry earmarked 60 Million German Marks for projects within the framework of the German Digital Libraries Program in two phases over the next six years. The scope for the German Digital Libraries Program was announced in a press release in April 1997,4 and the first call for preliminary projects and expressions of interest in participation ended in July 1997. The Consortium members were suggested by the Information and Communication Commission of the Learned Societies (IuK Kommission), by key scientific research funding agencies in the German government, and by the publishers themselves. The first official meeting of the participants took place on December 1, 1997, at the Deutsche Bibliothek, located in the renowned center of German book trade, Frankfurt, thus documenting the active role and participation of libraries and publishers. In contrast to the Digital Libraries Project of the National Science Foundation in the United States, the German Digital Libraries project is based on furthering cooperation with universities, scientific publishing houses (including various international publishers), book dealers, and special subject information centers, as well as academic and research libraries. The goals of the German Digital Libraries Project are to achieve: 1) efficient access to world wide information; 2) directly from the scientist's desktop; 3) while providing the organization for and stimulating fundamental structural changes in the information and communication process of the scientific community.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.3, xx S
  19. Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.0025801647 = product of:
      0.019351235 = sum of:
        0.0058533465 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058533465 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236001 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.0058533465 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058533465 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
    Pages
    21 S
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  20. Lindholm, J.; Schönthal, T.; Jansson , K.: Experiences of harvesting Web resources in engineering using automatic classification (2003) 0.00
    0.0025785938 = product of:
      0.025785938 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=4088,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Authors describe the background and the work involved in setting up Engine-e, a Web index that uses automatic classification as a mean for the selection of resources in Engineering. Considerations in offering a robot-generated Web index as a successor to a manually indexed quality-controlled subject gateway are also discussed
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/lindholm/ und http://engine-e.lub.lu.se/

Types