Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.18
    0.17737155 = product of:
      0.6740118 = sum of:
        0.051847067 = product of:
          0.1555412 = sum of:
            0.1555412 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1555412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2075661 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1555412 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1555412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2075661 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1555412 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1555412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2075661 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1555412 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1555412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2075661 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.1555412 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1555412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2075661 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.2631579 = coord(5/19)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Stewart, A.: Sociohistorical recommendations for the reclassification of pentecostalism in the Dewey Decimal Classification system (2019) 0.01
    0.005598487 = product of:
      0.053185627 = sum of:
        0.037240352 = weight(_text_:literatur in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037240352 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11727622 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.31754392 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.015945276 = weight(_text_:und in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015945276 = score(doc=5323,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird zum einen erläutert, wie die Pfingstbewegung in den neun gedruckten Ausgaben der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, die diesen Begriff im Register aufführen, jeweils behandelt wird - beginnend mit der 15. Auflage von 1951 bis zur jüngsten, der 23. Auflage von 2011. Es werden Probleme mit der Charakterisierung der Pfingstbewegung herausgearbeitet - insbesondere, dass sie als ein Amerika-zentriertes und rassisch homogenes Phänomen dargestellt wird. Dies verhindert eine soziohistorisch akkurate Repräsentation der Pfingstbewegung als einer geografisch und rassisch vielfältigen religiösen Tradition innerhalb von Bibliotheksbeständen, die nach der weltweit am meisten verbreiteten Klassifikation organisiert sind. Zum anderen werden Empfehlungen zur Reklassifikation der Pfingstbewegung in der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation gegeben, die zu einer korrekteren soziohistorischen Repräsentation beitragen und dadurch auch den Zugang zur großen Bandbreite von Literatur über diese globale und diverse religiöse Tradition verbessern würden.
  3. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.00
    0.004797519 = product of:
      0.04557643 = sum of:
        0.013221126 = weight(_text_:und in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013221126 = score(doc=405,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.24364883 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
        0.032355305 = sum of:
          0.02240403 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02240403 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.024482876 = queryNorm
              0.17415863 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
          0.009951275 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009951275 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.024482876 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Rötzer, F.: Warum schrumpft das Gehirn des Menschen seit ein paar Tausend Jahren? Unter: https://krass-und-konkret.de/wissenschaft-technik/warum-schrumpft-das-gehirn-des-menschen-seit-ein-paar-tausend-jahren/. "... seit einigen tausend Jahren - manche sagen seit 10.000 Jahren -, also nach dem Beginn der Landwirtschaft, der Sesshaftigkeit und der Stadtgründungen sowie der Erfindung der Schrift schrumpfte das menschliche Gehirn überraschenderweise wieder. ... Allgemein wird davon ausgegangen, dass mit den ersten Werkzeugen und vor allem beginnend mit der Erfindung der Schrift kognitive Funktionen, vor allem das Gedächtnis externalisiert wurden, allerdings um den Preis, neue Kapazitäten entwickeln zu müssen, beispielsweise Lesen und Schreiben. Gedächtnis beinhaltet individuelle Erfahrungen, aber auch kollektives Wissen, an dem alle Mitglieder einer Gemeinschaft mitwirken und in das das Wissen sowie die Erfahrungen der Vorfahren eingeschrieben sind. Im digitalen Zeitalter ist die Externalisierung und Entlastung der Gehirne noch sehr viel weitgehender, weil etwa mit KI nicht nur Wissensinhalte, sondern auch kognitive Fähigkeiten wie das Suchen, Sammeln, Analysieren und Auswerten von Informationen zur Entscheidungsfindung externalisiert werden, während die externalisierten Gehirne wie das Internet kollektiv in Echtzeit lernen und sich erweitern. Über Neuimplantate könnten schließlich Menschen direkt an die externalisierten Gehirne angeschlossen werden, aber auch direkt ihre kognitiven Kapazitäten erweitern, indem Prothesen, neue Sensoren oder Maschinen/Roboter auch in der Ferne in den ergänzten Körper der Gehirne aufgenommen werden.
    Die Wissenschaftler sehen diese Entwicklungen im Hintergrund, wollen aber über einen Vergleich mit der Hirnentwicklung bei Ameisen erklären, warum heutige Menschen kleinere Gehirne als ihre Vorfahren vor 100.000 Jahren entwickelt haben. Der Rückgang der Gehirngröße könnte, so die Hypothese, "aus der Externalisierung von Wissen und den Vorteilen der Entscheidungsfindung auf Gruppenebene resultieren, was zum Teil auf das Aufkommen sozialer Systeme der verteilten Kognition und der Speicherung und Weitergabe von Informationen zurückzuführen ist"."
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]
  4. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.00
    0.0037734555 = product of:
      0.035847828 = sum of:
        0.015945276 = weight(_text_:und in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015945276 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
        0.01990255 = product of:
          0.0398051 = sum of:
            0.0398051 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0398051 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Junger, U.: Can indexing be automated? : the example of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (2012) 0.00
    0.0031430693 = product of:
      0.05971832 = sum of:
        0.05971832 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05971832 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11561814 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.5165134 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file (Schlagwortnormdatei/SWD) provides a broad controlled vocabulary for indexing documents of all subjects. Traditionally used for intellectual subject cataloguing primarily of books the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB, German National Library) has been working on developping and implementing procedures for automated assignment of subject headings for online publications. This project, its results and problems are sketched in the paper.
  6. Brahms, E.: Digital library initiatives of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2001) 0.00
    0.0026940596 = product of:
      0.05118713 = sum of:
        0.05118713 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05118713 = score(doc=1190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11561814 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.44272578 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is the central public funding organization for academic research in Germany. It is thus comparable to a research council or a national research foundation. According to its statutes, DFG's mandate is to serve science and the arts in all fields by supporting research projects carried out at universities and public research institutions in Germany, to promote cooperation between researchers, and to forge and support links between German academic science, industry and partners in foreign countries. In the fulfillment of its tasks, the DFG pays special attention to the education and support of young scientists and scholars. DFG's mandate and operations follow the principle of territoriality. This means that its funding activities are restricted, with very few exceptions, to individuals and institutions with permanent addresses in Germany. Fellowships are granted for work in other countries, but most fellowship programs are restricted to German citizens, with a few exceptions for permanent residents of Germany holding foreign passports.
  7. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00
    0.0023246005 = product of:
      0.022083703 = sum of:
        0.018097384 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018097384 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11561814 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.1565272 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.003986319 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003986319 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
  8. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.00
    0.0019600186 = product of:
      0.037240352 = sum of:
        0.037240352 = weight(_text_:literatur in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037240352 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11727622 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.31754392 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  9. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.00
    0.0013756861 = product of:
      0.026138037 = sum of:
        0.026138037 = product of:
          0.052276075 = sum of:
            0.052276075 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052276075 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.40637016 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  10. Tillett, B.B.: RDA, or, The long journey of the catalog to the digital age (2016) 0.00
    0.0013756861 = product of:
      0.026138037 = sum of:
        0.026138037 = product of:
          0.052276075 = sum of:
            0.052276075 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052276075 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.40637016 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  11. Rusch-Feja, D.; Becker, H.J.: Global Info : the German digital libraries project (1999) 0.00
    0.0012699919 = product of:
      0.024129845 = sum of:
        0.024129845 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024129845 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11561814 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.20870294 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    The concept for the German Digital Libraries Program is imbedded in the Information Infrastructure Program of the German Federal Government for the years 1996-2000 which has been explicated in the Program Paper entitled "Information as Raw Material for Innovation".3 The Program Paper was published 1996 by the Federal Ministry for Education, Research, and Technology. The actual grants program "Global Info" was initiated by the Information and Communication Commission of the Joint Learned Societies to further technological advancement in enabling all researchers in Germany direct access to literature, research results, and other relevant information. This Commission was founded by four of the learned societies in 1995, and it has sponsored a series of workshops to increase awareness of leading edge technology and innovations in accessing electronic information sources. Now, nine of the leading research-level learned societies -- often those with umbrella responsibilities for other learned societies in their field -- are members of the Information and Communication Commission and represent the mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, chemists, educational researchers, sociologists, psychologists, biologists and information technologists in the German Association of Engineers. (The German professional librarian societies are not members, as such, of this Commission, but are represented through delegates from libraries in the learned societies and in the future, hopefully, also by the German Association of Documentalists or through the cooperation between the documentalist and librarian professional societies.) The Federal Ministry earmarked 60 Million German Marks for projects within the framework of the German Digital Libraries Program in two phases over the next six years. The scope for the German Digital Libraries Program was announced in a press release in April 1997,4 and the first call for preliminary projects and expressions of interest in participation ended in July 1997. The Consortium members were suggested by the Information and Communication Commission of the Learned Societies (IuK Kommission), by key scientific research funding agencies in the German government, and by the publishers themselves. The first official meeting of the participants took place on December 1, 1997, at the Deutsche Bibliothek, located in the renowned center of German book trade, Frankfurt, thus documenting the active role and participation of libraries and publishers. In contrast to the Digital Libraries Project of the National Science Foundation in the United States, the German Digital Libraries project is based on furthering cooperation with universities, scientific publishing houses (including various international publishers), book dealers, and special subject information centers, as well as academic and research libraries. The goals of the German Digital Libraries Project are to achieve: 1) efficient access to world wide information; 2) directly from the scientist's desktop; 3) while providing the organization for and stimulating fundamental structural changes in the information and communication process of the scientific community.
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00
    0.0012344937 = product of:
      0.02345538 = sum of:
        0.02345538 = product of:
          0.04691076 = sum of:
            0.04691076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04691076 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  13. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.00
    0.0012220864 = product of:
      0.023219641 = sum of:
        0.023219641 = product of:
          0.046439283 = sum of:
            0.046439283 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046439283 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  14. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.00
    0.0011791595 = product of:
      0.02240403 = sum of:
        0.02240403 = product of:
          0.04480806 = sum of:
            0.04480806 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480806 = score(doc=1173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  15. Coyle, K.: ¬The virtual union catalog : a comparative study (2000) 0.00
    0.0011791595 = product of:
      0.02240403 = sum of:
        0.02240403 = product of:
          0.04480806 = sum of:
            0.04480806 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480806 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  16. Klic, L.; Miller, M.; Nelson, J.K.; Pattuelli, C.; Provo, A.: ¬The drawings of the Florentine painters : from print catalog to linked open data (2017) 0.00
    0.0011791595 = product of:
      0.02240403 = sum of:
        0.02240403 = product of:
          0.04480806 = sum of:
            0.04480806 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480806 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  17. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.00
    9.82633E-4 = product of:
      0.018670026 = sum of:
        0.018670026 = product of:
          0.037340052 = sum of:
            0.037340052 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037340052 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  18. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.00
    9.82633E-4 = product of:
      0.018670026 = sum of:
        0.018670026 = product of:
          0.037340052 = sum of:
            0.037340052 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037340052 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12864152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  19. Pacek, Z.M.: Cataloguing and presentation tools for old maps and map series (2019) 0.00
    9.79096E-4 = product of:
      0.018602824 = sum of:
        0.018602824 = weight(_text_:und in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018602824 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Einblick in Katalogisierungspraxis und Erschließungshilfen von Karten.
  20. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.00
    8.7291887E-4 = product of:
      0.016585458 = sum of:
        0.016585458 = product of:
          0.033170916 = sum of:
            0.033170916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033170916 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57

Years