Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Borko, H.; Chatman, S.: Criteria for acceptable abstracts : a survey of abstractors' instructions (1963) 0.04 
    0.037572566 = product of:
  0.15029027 = sum of:
    0.15029027 = product of:
      0.30058053 = sum of:
        0.30058053 = weight(_text_:instructions in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30058053 = score(doc=687,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0453587 = queryNorm
            0.94217587 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The need for criteria by which to judge the adequacy of an abstract is felt most strongly when evaluating machine-produced abstracts. In order to develop a set of criteria, a survey was conducted of the instructions prepared by various scientific publications as a guide to their abstracters in the preparation of copy. One-hundred-and-thirty sets of instructions were analyzed and compared as to their function, content, and form. It was concluded that, while differences in subject matter do not necessarily require different kinds of abstracts, there are significant variations between the informative and the indicative abstract. A set of criteria for the writing of an acceptable abstract of science literature was derived. The adequacy of these criteria is still to be validated, and the athors' plans for fututre research in this area are specified
  2. Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963) 0.01 
    0.0122909555 = product of:
  0.049163822 = sum of:
    0.049163822 = product of:
      0.098327644 = sum of:
        0.098327644 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098327644 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0453587 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Pages
    S. 1-22
  3. Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969) 0.01 
    0.009218216 = product of:
  0.036872864 = sum of:
    0.036872864 = product of:
      0.07374573 = sum of:
        0.07374573 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07374573 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0453587 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Pages
    S.19-22
  4. Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963) 0.01 
    0.007681847 = product of:
  0.030727388 = sum of:
    0.030727388 = product of:
      0.061454777 = sum of:
        0.061454777 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061454777 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0453587 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
  5. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01 
    0.0053772926 = product of:
  0.02150917 = sum of:
    0.02150917 = product of:
      0.04301834 = sum of:
        0.04301834 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04301834 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0453587 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209

Authors

Themes