Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Fillmore, C.J.: ¬The case for case (1968) 0.04
    0.038516324 = product of:
      0.07703265 = sum of:
        0.07703265 = product of:
          0.1540653 = sum of:
            0.1540653 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1540653 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2952815 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.52175736 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Deutsche Übersetzung ('Plädoyer für Kasus') in: Kasustheorie. Hrsg. von W. Abraham. Frankfurt: Athenäum 1971 (Schwerpunkte Linguistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft; Bd.2) S.1-118.
  2. Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963) 0.03
    0.03388658 = product of:
      0.06777316 = sum of:
        0.06777316 = product of:
          0.13554633 = sum of:
            0.13554633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13554633 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S. 1-22
  3. Soergel, D.: Mathematical analysis of documentation systems : an attempt to a theory of classification and search request formulation (1967) 0.03
    0.02816925 = product of:
      0.0563385 = sum of:
        0.0563385 = product of:
          0.1690155 = sum of:
            0.1690155 = weight(_text_:objects in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1690155 = score(doc=5449,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.33233938 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.508563 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As an attempt to make a general structural theory of information retrieval, a documentation system (DS) is defined as a formal system consisting of (a) a set o of objects (documents); (b) a set A++ of elementary attributes (key-words), from which further attributes may be constructed: A++ generates A; (c) a set of axioms of the form X++(x)=m (m¯M, M a set of constant connecting attributes with objects: from the axioms further theorems (=true statements) may be constructed. By use of the theorems, different mappings O -> P(o) (P(o) set of all subsets of o) (search question -> set of documents retrieved) are defined. The type of a DS depends on two basic decisions: (1) choice of the rules for the construction of attributes and theorems, e.g., logical product in coordinate indexing; links. (2) choice of M; M may consist of the two constants 'applicable' and 'not applicable', or some positive integers, ...; Further practical decisions: A++ hierarchical or not; kind of mapping; introduction of roles (=further attributes). The most simple case - ordinary two-valued Coordinate Indexing - is discusssed in detail; o is a free distributive (but not Boolean) lattice, the homographic image a ring of subsets of o; instead of negation which is not useful, a useful retrieval operation 'praeternagation' is introduced. Furthermore these are discussed: a generalized definition of superimposed coding, some functions for the distance of objects or attributes; optimization and automatic derivation of classifications. The model takes into account term-term relations and document-document relations. It may serve as a structural framework in terms of which the functional problems of retrieval theory may be expressed more clearly
  4. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets (1965) 0.03
    0.026021637 = product of:
      0.052043274 = sum of:
        0.052043274 = product of:
          0.15612982 = sum of:
            0.15612982 = weight(_text_:objects in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15612982 = score(doc=5460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33233938 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A fuzzy set is a class of objects with a continuum of grades of membership. Such a set is characterized by a membership (characteristic) function which assigns to each object a grade of membership ranging between zero and one. The notions of inclusion, union, intersection, complement, relation, convexity, etc., are extended to such sets, and various properties of theses notions in the context of fuzzy sets are established. In particular, a separation theorem for convex fuzzy sets is proved without requiring that the fuzzy sets be disjoint
  5. Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969) 0.03
    0.025414936 = product of:
      0.050829872 = sum of:
        0.050829872 = product of:
          0.101659745 = sum of:
            0.101659745 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101659745 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  6. Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963) 0.02
    0.021179114 = product of:
      0.042358227 = sum of:
        0.042358227 = product of:
          0.084716454 = sum of:
            0.084716454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084716454 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
  7. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01
    0.0148253795 = product of:
      0.029650759 = sum of:
        0.029650759 = product of:
          0.059301518 = sum of:
            0.059301518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059301518 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06252774 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209