Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification on the march (1961) 0.00
    0.002863852 = product of:
      0.025774669 = sum of:
        0.008866822 = weight(_text_:in in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008866822 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
        0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907847 = score(doc=2001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Source
    Essays in librarianship in memory of William Charles Berwick Sayers: The Sayers memorial volume. Ed.: D.J. Foskett et al
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  2. Swanson, D.R.: Dialogues with a catalog (1964) 0.00
    0.002575293 = product of:
      0.023177637 = sum of:
        0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 7675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062697898 = score(doc=7675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7675)
        0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 7675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907847 = score(doc=7675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 7675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7675)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Su, S.-F.: Dialog with an OPAC. In: Library quarterly 64(1994) S.130-161
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  3. Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963) 0.00
    0.0025550222 = product of:
      0.0229952 = sum of:
        0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007165474 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
        0.015829725 = product of:
          0.047489174 = sum of:
            0.047489174 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047489174 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Pages
    S. 1-22
  4. Shrejder, J.A.: ¬A mathematical model of classification theory (1968) 0.00
    0.002207394 = product of:
      0.019866545 = sum of:
        0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053741056 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
        0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01449244 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Enthält die Entwicklung der Toleranzrelationen als Modell für die Ähnlichkeit von Klassen in einem Klassifikationssystem
  5. Garfield, E.: Chemico-linguistics : computer translation of chemical nomenclature (1961) 0.00
    0.0018394949 = product of:
      0.016555455 = sum of:
        0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044784215 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
        0.0120770335 = weight(_text_:der in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0120770335 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Content
    Zusammenfassung der Dissertation Vgl. auch: Garfield, E.: An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1961. In: Essays of an information scientist. Vol. 7. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, 1985. S.441-513.
  6. Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963) 0.00
    0.001596889 = product of:
      0.0143720005 = sum of:
        0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044784215 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
        0.0098935785 = product of:
          0.029680735 = sum of:
            0.029680735 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029680735 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Footnote
    Reprinted in: Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed. by L.M. Chan et al. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited 1985, S.247-261
    Source
    Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
  7. Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification through a century (1965) 0.00
    0.0015950549 = product of:
      0.014355494 = sum of:
        0.007109274 = weight(_text_:in in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007109274 = score(doc=1835,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
        0.00724622 = weight(_text_:der in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00724622 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The progress in the first century of the classification era is traced in the three majot perios: pre-facet, transition-to-facet, and facet period. The facet-period is divided into the restricted facet formula, generilised facet formula periods and the two relativity periods - viz. Dorking and Elsinore periods. For each of the six resulting periods, the chief achievements in library classification and the social factors leading to them are mentioned. The achievements of the Dorking period just ending are described in greater detail. The follows the programme of research work for the Elsinore period of 1965 to 1975. A programme for fundamental research in the idea, verbal, and notational planes is chalked out. Then follows the programme for routine research in the building of schedules of common isolates, whcih is a back log from the Dorking period, and in the new area of the design and building of schedules for the depth classification of diverse subjects, needed for documentation work and service. Lastly, the organization suitable to carry out the programme is outlined
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  8. Taylor, R.S.: Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries (1968) 0.00
    0.0013968822 = product of:
      0.01257194 = sum of:
        0.0065819086 = weight(_text_:in in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065819086 = score(doc=2694,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
        0.005990031 = product of:
          0.017970093 = sum of:
            0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017970093 = score(doc=2694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Seekers of information in libraries either go through a librarian intermediary or they help themselves. When they go through librarians they must develop their questions through four levels of need, referred to here as the visceral, conscious, formalized, and compromised needs. In his pre-search interview with an information seeker the reference librarian attempts to help him arrive at an understanding of his 'compromised' need by determining: (1) the subject of his interest; (2) his motivation; (3) his personal characteristics; (4) the relationship of the inquiry to file organization; and (5) anticipated answers. The author contends that research is needed into the techniques of conducting this negotiation between the user and the reference librarian
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch in: Reference and information services: a reader. Ed.: B. Katz and A. Tarr. New York: Scarecrow Press 1978. Vgl. auch den Artikel zur Rezeption und Wirkung: Chang, Y.-W.: The influence of Taylor's paper, Question-Negotiation and Information-Seeking in Libraries. In: Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.5, S.983-994.
    Source
    College and research libraries. 29(1968) no.3, S.178-194
  9. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.00
    0.0013728114 = product of:
      0.012355302 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=2718,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  10. Perreault, J.M.: Automized retranslatability of UDC codes (1968) 0.00
    0.0012549902 = product of:
      0.022589823 = sum of:
        0.022589823 = product of:
          0.06776947 = sum of:
            0.06776947 = weight(_text_:29 in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06776947 = score(doc=4944,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.87942183 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Date
    26. 9.1997 12:29:29
  11. Austin, D.: Prospects for a new general classification (1969) 0.00
    0.0012128986 = product of:
      0.010916088 = sum of:
        0.0059243953 = weight(_text_:in in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059243953 = score(doc=1519,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
        0.0049916925 = product of:
          0.0149750775 = sum of:
            0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0149750775 = score(doc=1519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification schemes, the universe of knowledge is brokeii down into self- contained disciplines which are further analysed to the point at which a particular concept is located. This leads to problems of: (a) currency: keeping the scheme in line with new discoveries. (b) hospitality: allowing room for insertion of new subjects (c) cross-classification: a concept may be considered in such a way that it fits as logically into one discipline as another. Machine retrieval is also hampered by the fact that any individual concept is notated differently, depending on where in the scheme it appears. The approach now considered is from an organized universe of concepts, every concept being set down only once in an appropriate vocabulary, where it acquires the notation which identifies it wherever it is used. It has been found that all the concepts present in any compound subject can be handled as though they belong to one of two basic concept types, being either Entities or Attributes. In classing, these concepts are identified, and notation is selected from appropriate schedules. Subjects are then built according to formal rules, the final class number incorporating operators which convey the fundamental relationships between concepts. From this viewpoint, the Rules and Operators of the proposed system can be seen as the grammar of an IR language, and the schedules of Entities and Attributes as its vocabulary.
    Date
    10.10.2014 18:17:29
  12. Swanson, D.R.: Searching natural language by computer (1960) 0.00
    0.0010735141 = product of:
      0.019323254 = sum of:
        0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019323254 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Footnote
    Ein Klassiker der Beiträge zum Information Retrieval
  13. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The UDC and FID: a historical perspective (1967) 0.00
    0.0010735141 = product of:
      0.019323254 = sum of:
        0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019323254 = score(doc=1157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  14. Kyle, B.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a study of the present position and future developments (1961) 0.00
    9.393248E-4 = product of:
      0.016907847 = sum of:
        0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907847 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  15. Scibor, E.: Attemps to bring nearer the structure of the UDC to the faceted classification (1968) 0.00
    9.393248E-4 = product of:
      0.016907847 = sum of:
        0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 2019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907847 = score(doc=2019,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 2019, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2019)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Source
    Aktuelle Probleme der Information und Dokumentation. 13(1968) Nr.5, S.11-15
  16. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.00
    6.65559E-4 = product of:
      0.011980062 = sum of:
        0.011980062 = product of:
          0.035940185 = sum of:
            0.035940185 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035940185 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Pages
    S.29-41
  17. Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969) 0.00
    6.5957184E-4 = product of:
      0.011872293 = sum of:
        0.011872293 = product of:
          0.03561688 = sum of:
            0.03561688 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03561688 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  18. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.00
    5.563364E-4 = product of:
      0.010014055 = sum of:
        0.010014055 = weight(_text_:in in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010014055 = score(doc=1194,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
    Source
    Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
  19. Lancaster, F.W.: On the need for role indicators in postcoordinate retrieval systems (1968) 0.00
    5.266129E-4 = product of:
      0.009479032 = sum of:
        0.009479032 = weight(_text_:in in 8948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009479032 = score(doc=8948,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.31810042 = fieldWeight in 8948, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8948)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of the findings of various evaluations of role indicators is given. In general, the results have been negative in that little real evidence for the value of the devices has been presented. The need for roles in various subject fields and in very large systems, is discussed. They can only by justified on purely ecomic grounds - if the added cost involved in their use is offset by substantial reduction in the amount of output screening that must be done by the end user
  20. Moss, R.: Minimum vocabularies in information indexing (1967) 0.00
    4.976024E-4 = product of:
      0.008956843 = sum of:
        0.008956843 = weight(_text_:in in 1814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008956843 = score(doc=1814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 1814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1814)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)