Search (244 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.03
    0.030693183 = product of:
      0.076732956 = sum of:
        0.025666492 = weight(_text_:information in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025666492 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  2. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems (1977) 0.03
    0.026631717 = product of:
      0.06657929 = sum of:
        0.025666492 = weight(_text_:information in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025666492 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
        0.040912796 = weight(_text_:und in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040912796 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Mandersloot, W.G.B.: Thesaurus control : the selection grouping and cross-referencing of terms for inclusion in a coordinate index world list (1970) 0.02
    0.019973785 = product of:
      0.04993446 = sum of:
        0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019249868 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
        0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030684596 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 21(1970), S.49-57
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Beling, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification (1979) 0.02
    0.019973785 = product of:
      0.04993446 = sum of:
        0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019249868 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
        0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030684596 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Beiträge von Sridhar, Schönfeldt und Gödert
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.02
    0.019954575 = product of:
      0.09977287 = sum of:
        0.09977287 = product of:
          0.2993186 = sum of:
            0.2993186 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2993186 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39943373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science (1975) 0.02
    0.019660963 = product of:
      0.049152408 = sum of:
        0.02869601 = weight(_text_:information in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02869601 = score(doc=626,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
        0.020456398 = weight(_text_:und in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020456398 = score(doc=626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vg. auch die Beiträge in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance) und S.2126 - 2144 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.321-343
  7. Thesaurofacet: a new concept in subject retrieval schemes (1972) 0.02
    0.01664482 = product of:
      0.04161205 = sum of:
        0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016041556 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Contributions in librarianship and information science; no.3
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979) 0.02
    0.016074141 = product of:
      0.04018535 = sum of:
        0.0136117125 = weight(_text_:information in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0136117125 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
        0.02657364 = weight(_text_:und in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02657364 = score(doc=1427,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  9. Bivins, K.T.: Frame searching and indexing languages (1979) 0.02
    0.016074141 = product of:
      0.04018535 = sum of:
        0.0136117125 = weight(_text_:information in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0136117125 = score(doc=1430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
        0.02657364 = weight(_text_:und in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02657364 = score(doc=1430,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper deals with the particular problem of lexical versus encyclopedic information, with emphasis on the role of each type of information in construction and use of indexing languages. With reference to this, the controlled vocabulary approach is evaluated and contrasted with the natural language approach. It is further suggested that the syndetic structure of the access language is critical, and that success in its use is predicated on the user's conceptual framework. Following from this, a theory of "frame searching" is proposed, which attempts to resolve some of the problems of the traditional "match" process in searching, and which also attempts to provide a theoretical account of the cognitive search processes of users. Finally, related research projects are briefly sketched, with suggestions for future directions
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  10. Bruner, J.: From communication to language (1975) 0.02
    0.015504411 = product of:
      0.038761027 = sum of:
        0.006416623 = weight(_text_:information in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006416623 = score(doc=1635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
        0.032344405 = weight(_text_:und in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032344405 = score(doc=1635,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bruner war der erste Erforscher des Spracherwerbs von Kindern, der Wittgensteins Problem zu würdigen wußte und eine Antwort darauf vorschlug. Wittgensteins allgemeinem Ansatz folgend, behauptete Bruner, daß das Kind den konventionellen Gebrauch eines sprachlichen Symbols dadurch erwirbt, daß es lernt, an einer Interaktionsform (Lebensform, Szene gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit) teilzunehmen, die es zunächst nichtsprachlich versteht, so daß die Sprache des Erwachsenen in geteilten Erfahrungen verankert werden kann, deren soziale Bedeutung es schon begreift. Eine Schlüsselkomponente dieses Prozesses ist zunächst ein Kind, das Erwachsene als intentionale Wesen auffassen kann, so daß es in bestimmten Kontexten seine Aufmerksamkeit mit ihnen teilen kann. Eine andere Komponente ist jedoch die bereits existierende, äußere soziale Welt, in der das Kind lebt. Um Sprache zu erwerben, muß das Kind in einer Welt leben, die strukturierte soziale Tätigkeiten aufweist, die es verstehen kann, so wie unser hypothetischer Besucher Ungarns das Kaufen von Fahrkarten und das Reisen mit Zügen verstand. Für Kinder bedeutet das häufig die Wiederkehr derselben routinemäßigen, allgemeinen Aktivität, so daß sie erkennen können, wie diese Aktivität aufgebaut ist und wie die verschiedenen sozialen Rollen in ihr funktionieren. Wenn wir am Spracherwerb interessiert sind, muß der Erwachsene außerdem ein neues sprachliches Symbol auf eine solche Weise verwenden, die das Kind als relevant für die gemeinsame Tätigkeit erkennen kann (nämlich im Gegensatz zur unvermittelten Ansprache des Ungarn auf dem Bahnhof). Wenn ein Kind in eine Welt geboren werden würde, in der dieselbe Art von Ereignis nie wiederkehrte, derselbe Gegenstand nie zweimal erschiene und Erwachsene nie dieselben Ausdrücke im selben Kontext verwendeten, dann würde im allgemeinen schwer zu sehen sein, wie dieses Kind eine natürliche Sprache erwerben könnte, welche kognitiven Fähigkeiten es auch immer haben möge. Eine Reihe von Untersuchungen hat gezeigt, daß Kinder nach ersten Fortschritten beim Spracherwerb neue Wörter am besten in Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit lernen. Oft handelt es sich dabei um solche, die in ihrer täglichen Erfahrung wiederkehren, wie Baden, Füttern, Windelwechseln, Vorlesen und Autofahren. Diese Tätigkeiten sind in vielen Hinsichten analog zu dem Szenario des Fahrkartenkaufs auf einem Bahnhof, insofern das Kind seine eigenen und die Ziele des Erwachsenen in der jeweiligen Situation versteht, was ihm ermöglicht, die Relevanz des Sprachverhaltens des Erwachsenen für diese Ziele zu erschließen. So stellten Tomasello und Todd fest, daß Kinder, die mit ihren Müttern längere Zeit bei Tätigkeiten gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit im Alter zwischen zwölf und achtzehn Monaten verbrachten, mit achtzehn Monaten ein größeres Vokabular hatten. Bei der Sprachverwendung Erwachsener innerhalb dieser Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit fanden Tomasello und Farrar sowohl korrelative als auch experimentelle Belege für die Hypothese, daß Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, der Aufmerksamkeit ihrer Kinder zu folgen (d. h. über einen Gegenstand zu sprechen, der schon im Brennpunkt des Interesses und der Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes stand), Kinder mit einem größeren Vokabular hatten als Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, die Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes auf etwas Neues zu lenken.
    Theme
    Information
  11. Rodriguez, R.D.: Geographic names in subject cataloging (1978) 0.02
    0.015346591 = product of:
      0.038366478 = sum of:
        0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012833246 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
        0.025533231 = product of:
          0.051066462 = sum of:
            0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051066462 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographical problems caused by geographic names in subject vataloging are examnied with a view toward determining procedures for establishing correct headings when changes of name occur and deciding upon the type of provisions to be made in subject catalog maintenance. Examples of typical changes of geographic names in Africa and suggested information cards for the subject catalog are provided
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.409-414
  12. Vasarhelyi, P.: Implications of the INTERCONCEPT project for classification and indexing (1979) 0.01
    0.0144794285 = product of:
      0.03619857 = sum of:
        0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009624934 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.02657364 = weight(_text_:und in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02657364 = score(doc=82,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Few librarians and documentalists realise that the same term may have different meanings even within the same subject field in the context of different schools of thought, cultures, etc. By making explicit the concepts that authors are using - based on their explicit definitions, rather than just inferring meanings from the way they use key-words - it would become possible to determine which of the several concepts a term refers to is used in a given case. The INTERCONCEPT project, launched by UNESCO in 1977 is intended to demonstrate, among other that the solution to this problem could be facilitated by using a conceptual data bank, both in indexing and classification and also in information retrieval. It should be noted that this is only one of the aims of the INTERCONCEPT project, the final aim bing to promote international understandingby conceptual control and analysis in the field of social sciences
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  13. Judge, A.J.N.: Representation of sets : the role of number (1979) 0.01
    0.010629456 = product of:
      0.05314728 = sum of:
        0.05314728 = weight(_text_:und in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05314728 = score(doc=73,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  14. Belkin, N.J.; Robertson, S.E: Information science and the phenomenon of information (1976) 0.01
    0.010266597 = product of:
      0.051332984 = sum of:
        0.051332984 = weight(_text_:information in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051332984 = score(doc=2710,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.6206552 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for information science. 27(1976), S.197-204
    Theme
    Information
  15. Belzer, J.: Information theory as a measure of information content (1973) 0.01
    0.010266597 = product of:
      0.051332984 = sum of:
        0.051332984 = weight(_text_:information in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051332984 = score(doc=4103,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.6206552 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1973), S.300-304
    Theme
    Information
  16. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.01
    0.010213292 = product of:
      0.051066462 = sum of:
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  17. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.010213292 = product of:
      0.051066462 = sum of:
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  18. Foskett, D.J.: Classification and indexing in the social sciences (1970) 0.01
    0.010213292 = product of:
      0.051066462 = sum of:
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 22(1970), S.90-101
  19. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.0089366315 = product of:
      0.044683155 = sum of:
        0.044683155 = product of:
          0.08936631 = sum of:
            0.08936631 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08936631 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  20. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.01
    0.0089366315 = product of:
      0.044683155 = sum of:
        0.044683155 = product of:
          0.08936631 = sum of:
            0.08936631 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08936631 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29

Authors