Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.20
    0.196204 = product of:
      0.392408 = sum of:
        0.098102 = product of:
          0.294306 = sum of:
            0.294306 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.294306 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.294306 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.294306 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Foskett, D.J.: Classification and indexing in the social sciences (1970) 0.09
    0.09021294 = product of:
      0.18042588 = sum of:
        0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13021462 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 22(1970), S.90-101
  3. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.08
    0.078936316 = product of:
      0.15787263 = sum of:
        0.11393778 = weight(_text_:social in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11393778 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  4. Wright, K.: Social science information characteristics with particular reference to the educational resources information centers (1973) 0.03
    0.032553654 = product of:
      0.13021462 = sum of:
        0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 2577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13021462 = score(doc=2577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 2577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2577)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Chubin, D.E.; Moitra, S.D.: Content analysis of references : adjunct or alternative to citation counting? (1975) 0.03
    0.032553654 = product of:
      0.13021462 = sum of:
        0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13021462 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Social studies of science. 5(1975), S.423-441
  6. Moravcsik, M.J.; Murugesan, P.: Some results on the function and quality of citations (1975) 0.03
    0.032553654 = product of:
      0.13021462 = sum of:
        0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13021462 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.704911 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Social studies of science. 5(1975), S.86-92
  7. Kelley, J.H.: New demands for cross-disciplinary indexing (1970) 0.03
    0.028484445 = product of:
      0.11393778 = sum of:
        0.11393778 = weight(_text_:social in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11393778 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    The social impact of information retrieval, the information bazaar. 7th Ann. Natl. Coll. on Information Retrieval, 8.-9.5.1970
  8. Winn, V.A.: ¬A case study in the problem of information processing in the social science field (1971) 0.03
    0.028484445 = product of:
      0.11393778 = sum of:
        0.11393778 = weight(_text_:social in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11393778 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Line, M.: ¬The information uses and needs of social scientists : an overview of infross (1971) 0.03
    0.028484445 = product of:
      0.11393778 = sum of:
        0.11393778 = weight(_text_:social in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11393778 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Rao, I.K.: ¬The distribution of scientific productivity and social change (1978) 0.02
    0.02301891 = product of:
      0.09207564 = sum of:
        0.09207564 = weight(_text_:social in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09207564 = score(doc=8,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.49844736 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Results in the literature concerning the probability that an author publishes r articles in time t are reexamined, and it is found that a negative binomial distribution bits scientific productivity data (by the chi-squared goodness-of-fit-test) better than many other distribution such as geometric, logarithmic, zeta, cumulative advantage, etc. It is shown analytically that the nagative binomial distribution describes a pattern of scientific productivity under the 'success-breeds-success' condition in a wide variety of social circumstances
  11. Raghavan, K.S.; Iyer, H.: Structuring of compound and complex subjects in social sciences : a user's survey (1978) 0.02
    0.02114422 = product of:
      0.08457688 = sum of:
        0.08457688 = weight(_text_:social in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08457688 = score(doc=2302,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.45785317 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based on a paper presentend to the Documentation Research and Training Centre 'Seminar on classification and indexing in social sciences', Bangalore. An analysis of a detailed survey on facet-analysed subject strings in the field of social sciences. Subject strings of 4 typers were administered as a stratified sample of responses to identify the gaps in semantic connotation of terms. This survey has helped to idetify the possible aberrations in the semantic connotations due to the presence or absence of terms. It was found that use of prepositions, conjunctions and other role indicating terms gives semantic clarity. The syntax of speciator terms may have to be varied according to the respondent groups. It was found that if the number of component terms in a subject string increases beyond a certain limit it gives rise to problems in interpretation of ideas. This indicates a break-even point for formulating subject headings
  12. Swanson, D.R.: Some unexplained aspects of the Cranfield tests of indexing performance factors (1971) 0.02
    0.020912344 = product of:
      0.083649375 = sum of:
        0.083649375 = product of:
          0.16729875 = sum of:
            0.16729875 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16729875 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.79900736 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Olson, D.R.: Language and thought : aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics (1970) 0.02
    0.020912344 = product of:
      0.083649375 = sum of:
        0.083649375 = product of:
          0.16729875 = sum of:
            0.16729875 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16729875 = score(doc=2286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.79900736 = fieldWeight in 2286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Körner, S.: Classification theory (1976) 0.01
    0.0142422225 = product of:
      0.05696889 = sum of:
        0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 1761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05696889 = score(doc=1761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 1761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1761)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Some theory of classification underlies most practical activities, whether individual or social. It is involved in most attempt to understand the structure or reality on a metaphysical level and it is presupposed in the formulation of scientific laws. The logical and meterial principles of classification are covered as well as various general problems and criteria of classification. Differing classification principles in particular domains such as the natural sciences and medicine and in information are discussed as well as the place and role of classification in scientific method, its relation to and dependence on theory, scientific nomenclature and the philosophical issues through the heritage of Plato and Aristotle
  15. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.01
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  16. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  17. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.01
    0.012552816 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = product of:
          0.10042253 = sum of:
            0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10042253 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  18. Edwards, T.: Indexing LISA: Chains, KISS and the bold approach (1978) 0.01
    0.01220762 = product of:
      0.04883048 = sum of:
        0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04883048 = score(doc=1337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes chain indexing in LISA and the modifications to the technique made necessary by a practical working situation. The method was adopted on a "Keep it simple and stupid" basis. However, some permutations and a number of qualifying words have been introduced in order to make entries more understandable. Other difficulties have emerged because the subject field of LISA is connected so closely with social institutions and human relationships. There is also the problem of certain foreign language terms which are virtually meaningless when translated into English. A retrieval test carried out by E.M. Keen had a useful by-product in showing that the layout of the LISA indexes could be improved and the use of bold lead terms is now under consideration
  19. Vasarhelyi, P.: Implications of the INTERCONCEPT project for classification and indexing (1979) 0.01
    0.01220762 = product of:
      0.04883048 = sum of:
        0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04883048 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Few librarians and documentalists realise that the same term may have different meanings even within the same subject field in the context of different schools of thought, cultures, etc. By making explicit the concepts that authors are using - based on their explicit definitions, rather than just inferring meanings from the way they use key-words - it would become possible to determine which of the several concepts a term refers to is used in a given case. The INTERCONCEPT project, launched by UNESCO in 1977 is intended to demonstrate, among other that the solution to this problem could be facilitated by using a conceptual data bank, both in indexing and classification and also in information retrieval. It should be noted that this is only one of the aims of the INTERCONCEPT project, the final aim bing to promote international understandingby conceptual control and analysis in the field of social sciences
  20. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.01
    0.010983714 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = product of:
          0.08786971 = sum of:
            0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08786971 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29