-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.15
0.15166257 = product of:
0.35387933 = sum of:
0.050554194 = product of:
0.15166257 = sum of:
0.15166257 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15166257 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32382426 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15166257 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15166257 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32382426 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.15166257 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15166257 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32382426 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988)
0.04
0.040402748 = product of:
0.1414096 = sum of:
0.11380961 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11380961 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.72576207 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
0.027600005 = product of:
0.082800016 = sum of:
0.082800016 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082800016 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.03
0.03365269 = product of:
0.11778441 = sum of:
0.093634404 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093634404 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.024150005 = product of:
0.07245001 = sum of:
0.07245001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07245001 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.03
0.029643005 = product of:
0.10375051 = sum of:
0.08634392 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08634392 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.017406588 = product of:
0.052219763 = sum of:
0.052219763 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052219763 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
- Source
- Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
-
Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.027038556 = product of:
0.09463494 = sum of:
0.07722835 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07722835 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.017406588 = product of:
0.052219763 = sum of:
0.052219763 = weight(_text_:29 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052219763 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.03
0.025537914 = product of:
0.08938269 = sum of:
0.061782684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061782684 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.027600005 = product of:
0.082800016 = sum of:
0.082800016 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082800016 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.03
0.025537914 = product of:
0.08938269 = sum of:
0.061782684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061782684 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.027600005 = product of:
0.082800016 = sum of:
0.082800016 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082800016 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.03
0.025537914 = product of:
0.08938269 = sum of:
0.061782684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061782684 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.027600005 = product of:
0.082800016 = sum of:
0.082800016 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082800016 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.03
0.025537914 = product of:
0.08938269 = sum of:
0.061782684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061782684 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.027600005 = product of:
0.082800016 = sum of:
0.082800016 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082800016 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983)
0.03
0.02512141 = product of:
0.08792493 = sum of:
0.046337012 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046337012 = score(doc=1637,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.04158791 = product of:
0.062381864 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.031050006 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031050006 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A non-classical logic for information retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.024690958 = product of:
0.086418346 = sum of:
0.065530434 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530434 = score(doc=1933,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
0.020887908 = product of:
0.06266372 = sum of:
0.06266372 = weight(_text_:29 in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06266372 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. 1997. S.268-272.
- Source
- Computer journal. 29(1986), S.481-485
-
Williamson, N.J.: Classification in online systems : research and the North American perspective (1985)
0.02
0.022408308 = product of:
0.07842907 = sum of:
0.05405985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05405985 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.024369223 = product of:
0.07310767 = sum of:
0.07310767 = weight(_text_:29 in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07310767 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- International cataloguing. 14(1985), S.29-31
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Saracevic, T.: Information retrieval (1985)
0.02
0.022408308 = product of:
0.07842907 = sum of:
0.05405985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05405985 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
0.024369223 = product of:
0.07310767 = sum of:
0.07310767 = weight(_text_:29 in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07310767 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Pages
- Chpt.4, S.1-29
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989)
0.02
0.022345673 = product of:
0.078209855 = sum of:
0.05405985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05405985 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.024150005 = product of:
0.07245001 = sum of:
0.07245001 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07245001 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
-
Teodorescu, I.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.02
0.020575795 = product of:
0.07201528 = sum of:
0.05460869 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05460869 = score(doc=542,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.017406588 = product of:
0.052219763 = sum of:
0.052219763 = weight(_text_:29 in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052219763 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Comparing artificial intelligence and information retrieval paradigms for natural language understanding provides a basis for reviewing progress to date. The applicability of artificial intelligence to question-answering systems is outlined. A list of the principal artificial intelligence software for data base front-end systems is appended.
- Source
- Canadian library journal. 44(1987), S.29-32
-
Rau, L.F.: Conceptual information extraction and retrieval from natural language input (198)
0.02
0.020575795 = product of:
0.07201528 = sum of:
0.05460869 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05460869 = score(doc=1955,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.017406588 = product of:
0.052219763 = sum of:
0.052219763 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052219763 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 13:29:20
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.527-533
-
Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988)
0.02
0.020531056 = product of:
0.0718587 = sum of:
0.05460869 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05460869 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.017250005 = product of:
0.05175001 = sum of:
0.05175001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05175001 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 12:51:22
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system (1986)
0.02
0.01920712 = product of:
0.06722492 = sum of:
0.046337012 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046337012 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
0.020887908 = product of:
0.06266372 = sum of:
0.06266372 = weight(_text_:29 in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06266372 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:16:29
-
Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983)
0.02
0.01889567 = product of:
0.06613485 = sum of:
0.05405985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05405985 = score(doc=5001,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.012075002 = product of:
0.036225006 = sum of:
0.036225006 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036225006 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
- Date
- 14. 3.1996 13:22:21
-
Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986)
0.02
0.017785802 = product of:
0.06225031 = sum of:
0.051806357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051806357 = score(doc=2047,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.010443954 = product of:
0.03133186 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
