Search (914 results, page 1 of 46)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.11847439 = product of:
      0.3949146 = sum of:
        0.038109176 = product of:
          0.11432753 = sum of:
            0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.007936673 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007936673 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005886175 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  2. Riehm, U.; Böhle, K.; Wingert, B.; Gabel-Becker, I.; Loeben, M.: Autoren, Verlage, Nutzer : Elektronisches Publizieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1989) 0.05
    0.050552208 = product of:
      0.16850735 = sum of:
        0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015627023 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.015873346 = weight(_text_:der in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015873346 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015627023 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024396934 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005886175 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.091096856 = weight(_text_:elektronischen in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091096856 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15407887 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.5912352 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Ergebnisse des Projekts Elektronisches Publizieren (PEP) werden übersichtsartig dargestellt. Das Projekt umfaßte 1985-1988 eine Begleit- und Wirkungsuntersuchung zum Elektronischen Publizieren von Volltexten
  3. Hörz, H.: Widerspiegelung, Kommunikation und Sprache (1981) 0.03
    0.027672961 = product of:
      0.1844864 = sum of:
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
        0.13447993 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13447993 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.9086515 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
  4. Williamson, N.J.: Subject access in the on-line environment (1984) 0.02
    0.018436916 = product of:
      0.09218458 = sum of:
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
        0.034155704 = weight(_text_:des in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034155704 = score(doc=573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
        0.014273217 = weight(_text_:in in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014273217 = score(doc=573,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.3644298 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Footnote
    Ein guter und lesenswerter Einstieg in die Probleme des sachlichen Online-Retrievals
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 13(1984), S.49-97
  5. Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Davidson, C.H.: Improved design of graphic displays in thesauri : through technology and ergonomics (1986) 0.02
    0.017230403 = product of:
      0.08615201 = sum of:
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
        0.034155704 = weight(_text_:des in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034155704 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
        0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008240645 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Rival, I.: Order - a theory with a view (1989) 0.02
    0.016513655 = product of:
      0.08256827 = sum of:
        0.021653436 = weight(_text_:und in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021653436 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.03110528 = weight(_text_:der in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03110528 = score(doc=143,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4836247 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.021653436 = weight(_text_:und in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021653436 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
        0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0081561245 = score(doc=143,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Ordnung hat in unserer Alltagssprache eine Fülle von Bedeutungen. Als mathematischer Begriff ist Ordnung mit einer begrenzten Bedeutung festgelegt, die als eine Abstraktion der Beziehungen 'ist enthalten in', 'ist ein Teil von' und 'ist kleiner als' verstanden werden kann. Der mathematische Ordnungsbegriff tritt in vielen Bereichen der Mathematik und ihrer Anwendungen auf. Seine aktuelle Verwendbarkeit, wie etwa im Bereich der theoretischen Informatik, machen die mathematische Ordnungstheorie zu einem attraktiven Teilgebiet der gegenwärtigen Mathematik
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille
  7. Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988) 0.02
    0.015675522 = product of:
      0.06270209 = sum of:
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
        0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010092689 = score(doc=3555,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
        0.013653717 = product of:
          0.027307434 = sum of:
            0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027307434 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    The patterns of overlap between terms which are closely related in a thesaurus are considered. The relationships considered are parent/child, in which one term is a broader term of the other, and sibling in which to 2 terms share the same broader term. The patterns of overlap observed in the MeSH thesaurus with respect to selected MEDLINE postings are examined. The implications of the overlap patterns are discussed, in particular, the impact of the overlap patterns on the potential effectiveness of a proposed algorithm for handling negation is considered.
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:52:34
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Foskett, D.J.: Thesaurus (1980) 0.01
    0.013356235 = product of:
      0.08904156 = sum of:
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
        0.039035093 = weight(_text_:des in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039035093 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.48954904 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Buchan, R.L.: Intertwining thesauri and dictionaries (1989) 0.01
    0.013356235 = product of:
      0.08904156 = sum of:
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
        0.025003234 = weight(_text_:und in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025003234 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
        0.039035093 = weight(_text_:des in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039035093 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.48954904 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Wells, D.: Which is the most beautiful? (1988) 0.01
    0.012723255 = product of:
      0.063616276 = sum of:
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
        0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019048017 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Präsentation einer Liste der schönsten mathematischen Formeln und Sätze (s. Abbildung)
    Footnote
    Vgl. das Ergebnis in: Mathematical intelligencer 12(1990) no.3, S.37-41
  11. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.01
    0.011686705 = product of:
      0.07791136 = sum of:
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
        0.034155704 = weight(_text_:des in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034155704 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  12. Sager, J.C.: Terminological thesaurus : a more appropriate designation or a deprecated synonym? (1982) 0.01
    0.011686705 = product of:
      0.07791136 = sum of:
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 7538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=7538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7538)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 7538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=7538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7538)
        0.034155704 = weight(_text_:des in 7538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034155704 = score(doc=7538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 7538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7538)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Sridhar, M.S.: ¬A mathematical approach to relations in thesauri (1980) 0.01
    0.0100583825 = product of:
      0.05029191 = sum of:
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 7700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=7700,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 7700, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7700)
        0.011111342 = weight(_text_:der in 7700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011111342 = score(doc=7700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 7700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7700)
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 7700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=7700,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 7700, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7700)
        0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 7700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008240645 = score(doc=7700,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7700, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7700)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief background of set theory and relations including equivalence and ordering relations. Proposes four working hypotheses concerned with thesauri relations (USE, UF, NT, BT, GS & RT) and examines these relations against the characteristics of relations defined in mathematics. Explores the possibility of generating equivalence class of descritors from a single descriptor to aid information/document retrieval. provides a new mathematical approach to thesaurus and its relations and compares it against traditional way of representing thesaurus. Proposes new areas for investigation in this direction
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Beiträge (mit tw. abweichender Argumentation) von G. Beling: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification und W. Gödert: Zum Problem der Äquivalenzrelation in Dokumentationssprachen und Schönfeldt
  14. Austin, D.: PRECIS: Introduction (1987) 0.01
    0.010017176 = product of:
      0.06678117 = sum of:
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
        0.029276319 = weight(_text_:des in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029276319 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Footnote
    Zusammenfassende kompakte Darstellung des Systems PRECIS, seiner Geschichte, Eigenschaften und Möglichkeiten bis hin zum Online-Retrieval. - Als Einführung zu empfehlen
  15. Dailey, J.E.: Subject headings (1980) 0.01
    0.009896752 = product of:
      0.06597835 = sum of:
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 7602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=7602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7602)
        0.022222685 = weight(_text_:der in 7602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022222685 = score(doc=7602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 7602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7602)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 7602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=7602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 7602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7602)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Enthält Geschichte der Library of Congress Subject Headings und Sears' list
  16. Maniez, J.: Relationships in thesauri : some critical remarks (1988) 0.01
    0.009809675 = product of:
      0.04904837 = sum of:
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
        0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010092689 = score(doc=806,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    After reviewing some fundamental distinctions in relationships (paradigmatic/sytagmatic, interconceptual/ structural) the author proposes a functional approach for investigating the relationships in thesauri. The comparison between three closely related types of semantic fields (lexical, conceptual, thesaural) shows the specific function of relationships in all of these intellectual tools. In information retrieval the two main functions are location of relevant concepts and search of exhaustivity. a clear distinction of these aims can contribute to solving the difficult problem of the choice of 'related terms'. It is suggested that their usefulness relies upon empirical rather than upon semantic proximity. Some practical propositions are amde for the choice and display of relationships in thesauri
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Rada, R.: Connecting and evaluating thesauri : issues and cases (1987) 0.01
    0.009809675 = product of:
      0.04904837 = sum of:
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010092689 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Connecting and evaluating thesauri is an important task for the systematic development of better information retrieval systems. Connecting thesauri includes not only determining when terms in different thesauri are the same but also determining what kinds of relationships can be transferred from one thesaurus to another. This paper first presents issues in connecting and evaluating thesauri. Various experiments in connecting a particular thesaurus, the Medical Subject Headings, with other medical thesauri are described. In these experiments, similar terms in two thesauri are recognized and then differences in two thesauri are exploited to create more powerful thesauri. Part of the evaluation requires the thesaurus to support automatic indexing and retrieving of documents
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  18. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.00908911 = product of:
      0.03635644 = sum of:
        0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054694577 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054694577 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.012075866 = weight(_text_:des in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012075866 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1514465 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.006514802 = weight(_text_:in in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006514802 = score(doc=3644,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.16633868 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.0068268585 = product of:
          0.013653717 = sum of:
            0.013653717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013653717 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  19. Somers, H.L.: Observations on standards and guidelines concerning thesaurus construction (1981) 0.01
    0.008615201 = product of:
      0.043076005 = sum of:
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
        0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010938915 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
        0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041203224 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    An attempt is made to compare the existing standards and guidelines for thesaurus consruction and development, focussing particularly on the ISO, BSI standards as well as on the guidelines suggested by Aitchison and Gilchrist, and UNISIST. The different facets/aspects considered are: linguistic aspects of thesauri; formal requirements suggested by the standards/guidelines with special emphasis on problems associated with the compound terms, homographs, forms of terms, etc.; semantic relationships between terms - synonymy, BT/NT, and associativity; problems peculiar to multilingual thesauri, especially the problem of inexact equivalence between terms; and presentation and arrangement of terms in a thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  20. Vasiljev, A.: ¬The law of requisite variety as applied to subject indexing and retrieval (1989) 0.01
    0.00848293 = product of:
      0.05655287 = sum of:
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019048017 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018752426 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille

Authors

Themes