-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.14
0.14273989 = product of:
0.21410984 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.18940249 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.09831624 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831624 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
-
Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007)
0.13
0.12819654 = product of:
0.1922948 = sum of:
0.029949818 = weight(_text_:information in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029949818 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.16234499 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427106 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This note is also appearing in the Journal of the American Society for Information Systems and Technology.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 14:22:47
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1441-1446
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.12
0.124901965 = sum of:
0.08232375 = product of:
0.24697125 = sum of:
0.24697125 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24697125 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43943653 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.027603304 = product of:
0.055206608 = sum of:
0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055206608 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.12
0.12479672 = product of:
0.18719508 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.1622369 = sum of:
0.09201101 = weight(_text_:management in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09201101 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022589 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
- Footnote
- Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
- Theme
- Information
-
Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009)
0.11
0.10692836 = product of:
0.16039254 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.14541763 = sum of:
0.1032821 = weight(_text_:management in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1032821 = score(doc=2764,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:08:51
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.789-802
-
AI-Hawamdeh, S.: Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management (2005)
0.10
0.10375499 = product of:
0.15563248 = sum of:
0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017648099 = score(doc=4236,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.13798438 = sum of:
0.10287144 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10287144 = score(doc=4236,freq=20.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.58882177 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management requires a good understanding of knowledge processes and the ability to differentiate between information management and knowledge management. Given the complexity of knowledge and the nature of its existence, there is a need for graduate programs to go beyond information management and include in the curriculum disciplines that deal with social, cultural, and economic issues such as communication, cognitive science, and business. An understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge management is necessary for a more balanced and practical approach to the development of a knowledge management curriculum. In this article, the design and development of an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore is reported. The initiation of the program was influenced by the strong demand from the public sector in Singapore for knowledge management professionals. It was developed in close association with the information studies program at Nanyang Technological University. In the first year, the program attracted 230 applicants, of which 45 were selected-22 students came from the public sector and 23 students came from the private sector.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenschwerpunktes: Knowledge Management in Asia
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.11, S.1200-1206
-
Nyseter, T.: Learning centres and knowledge management : based on common ideas? (2005)
0.10
0.101832315 = product of:
0.15274847 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=3014,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
0.12804113 = sum of:
0.078883015 = weight(_text_:management in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078883015 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- New roles for libraries and librarians in the information and knowledge society are discussed worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to present the ideas behind the philosophy of Learning Centres (LC) and Knowledge Management (KM) respectively, and make a comparative study between the two approaches. The paper is based on KM theory and a case-study of the Learning Centres at Oslo University College (OUC), and was originally written as a theme paper in connection to the course "Information in Organizations and Knowledge Management" which is part of the Masters' programme in Library and Information science at OUC.
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 11:55:29
- Source
- Librarianship in the information age: Proceedings of the 13th BOBCATSSS Symposium, 31 January - 2 February 2005 in Budapest, Hungary. Eds.: Marte Langeland u.a
-
Moore, R.W.: Management of very large distributed shared collections (2009)
0.10
0.10173203 = product of:
0.15259804 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.14024436 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=3845,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Large scientific collections may be managed as data grids for sharing data, digital libraries for publishing data, persistent archives for preserving data, or as real-time data repositories for sensor data. Despite the multiple types of data management objectives, it is possible to build each system from generic software infrastructure. This entry examines the requirements driving the management of large data collections, the concepts on which current data management systems are based, and the current research initiatives for managing distributed data collections.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:57
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.09
0.09334247 = product of:
0.1400137 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.12942484 = sum of:
0.08728931 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08728931 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.09
0.0909736 = product of:
0.1364604 = sum of:
0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021397185 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.115063205 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.06952008 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06952008 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.09
0.087198876 = product of:
0.13079831 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.120209455 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Xia, J.: GIS in the management of library pick-up books (2004)
0.08
0.08394633 = product of:
0.12591949 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
0.113565825 = sum of:
0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064407706 = score(doc=2853,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The management of library "pick-up books" - a phrase that refers to books pulled off the shelves by readers, discarded in the library after use, and picked up by library assistants for reshelving - is an issue for many collection managers. This research attempts to use geographic information system (GIS) software as a tool to monitor the use of such books so that their distributions by book shelf-ranges can be displayed visually. With GIS, library floor layouts are drawn as maps. This research produces some explanations of the habits of library patrons browsing shelved materials, and makes suggestions to librarians on the expansion of library collections and the rearrangement potential for library space.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.209-216
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.08
0.083149634 = product of:
0.12472445 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.10974954 = sum of:
0.06761401 = weight(_text_:management in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06761401 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
-
Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004)
0.08
0.077398956 = product of:
0.116098434 = sum of:
0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021397185 = score(doc=2538,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:39:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.619-632
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software (2000)
0.07
0.07487803 = product of:
0.11231704 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.09734213 = sum of:
0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055206608 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Different Knowledge Management Software (KMS) suites approach information retrieval in different ways. Some of them have in-built knowledge structures, and some of those structures may be called a "thesaurus". But they are not thesauri as defined by the standard ISO 2788. This paper describes the types of knowledge structure which are provided for in the Verity search engine, namely "Thesaurus" and "Topics". An examination of how they are constructed shows strengths and weaknesses, and their potential to be applied to automatic categorization of search results. Unfortunately it is difficult to quantify the performance benefits of any of these knowledge structures, or even compare them with the benefits of using the traditional techniques of vocabulary control. However, the problems of retrieving information on many intranets has led some practitioners to apply simple vocabulary control to complement the functionality of their chosen KMS
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:45
-
Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000)
0.07
0.07478131 = product of:
0.11217197 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- 'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:37:55
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.24-34
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Tsakonas, G.; Papatheodorou, C.: Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries (2008)
0.07
0.07478131 = product of:
0.11217197 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Advances in the publishing world have emerged new models of digital library development. Open access publishing modes are expanding their presence and realize the digital library idea in various means. While user-centered evaluation of digital libraries has drawn considerable attention during the last years, these systems are currently viewed from the publishing, economic and scientometric perspectives. The present study explores the concepts of usefulness and usability in the evaluation of an e-print archive. The results demonstrate that several attributes of usefulness, such as the level and the relevance of information, and usability, such as easiness of use and learnability, as well as functionalities commonly met in these systems, affect user interaction and satisfaction.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 11:49:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1234-1250
-
LaBarre, K.: Discovery and access systems for Websites and cultural heritage sites reconsidering the practical application of facets (2008)
0.07
0.07478131 = product of:
0.11217197 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Facets are an increasingly common feature of contemporary access and discovery systems. These intuitively adaptable structures seem well suited for application in information architecture and the practice of knowledge management (La Barre, 2006). As browsing and searching devices, facets function equally well on e-commerce sites, digital museum portals, and online library catalogs. This paper argues that clearly articulated principles for facets and facet analysis must draw examples from current practice while building upon heritage principles m order to scaffold the development of robust and fully faceted information infrastructures.
- Date
- 27.12.2008 9:50:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.07
0.071954 = product of:
0.107930996 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.09734213 = sum of:
0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055206608 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003)
0.07
0.07179232 = product of:
0.10768847 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.079451516 = product of:
0.15890303 = sum of:
0.15890303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15890303 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2005 14:22:22
- Source
- Information retrieval. 6(2003) no.1, S.99-150
