Search (1650 results, page 1 of 83)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.49
    0.4895892 = product of:
      0.62947184 = sum of:
        0.046703033 = product of:
          0.14010909 = sum of:
            0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.010380501 = product of:
          0.020761002 = sum of:
            0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020761002 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.011951938 = product of:
          0.023903877 = sum of:
            0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023903877 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.7777778 = coord(7/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.39
    0.3935163 = product of:
      0.7083293 = sum of:
        0.05448687 = product of:
          0.16346061 = sum of:
            0.16346061 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  3. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.34
    0.33729967 = product of:
      0.6071394 = sum of:
        0.046703033 = product of:
          0.14010909 = sum of:
            0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  4. Günther, S.: Aufbruch in den virtuellen Raum : Anleitung zum Aufbau eines Web Contact Centers (2005) 0.02
    0.021549935 = product of:
      0.0969747 = sum of:
        0.012233539 = product of:
          0.024467077 = sum of:
            0.024467077 = weight(_text_:web in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024467077 = score(doc=4207,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08474116 = sum of:
          0.06482126 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06482126 = score(doc=4207,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.34896767 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
          0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019919898 = score(doc=4207,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4207, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4207)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Die Weiten des Internet tendieren ins Unendliche - kaum etwas, was dort nicht vorhanden zu sein scheint. Google rühmt sich, dass jetzt die Suche auf über acht Milliarden Websites möglich ist und hat mit dem Einscannen der Bestände von US-amerikanischen und englischen Bibliotheken schon das nächste größere Projekt in Angriff genommen. Auch Microsoft schickt sich an, eine ernstzunehmende Konkurrenz in Sachen Internetrecherche zu werden. Hinzu kommt, dass das Internet eine immer größere Nutzung erfährt, 2004 lag diese bei 55,3 Prozent der Bevölkerung ab 14 Jahren - doch das alles heißt nicht, dass die Nutzer 3 im Gegenzug auch immer bessere Recherchefähigkeiten aufweisen. Es vergeht kein Tag, an dem im Informationsdienst von Bibliotheken nicht der Satz »Im Internet habe ich schon geguckt, dafind ich nix!« fällt. 100.000 Treffer zu einer Suchanfrage zu erhalten ist nicht die Kunst, aber fünf relevante Treffer zu erhalten, die noch dazu einer kritischen Bewertung standhalten (Stichwort »Information Literacy«), das bedarf eines professionellen Informationsvermittlers - eines Bibliothekars! Noch nie waren so viele Nutzer im Netz und zugleich so viele so unzufrieden. Wäre es nicht Aufgabe der Bibliotheken diese (potenziellen) Kunden aufzufangen, bevor sie in den Weiten des Internet verloren gehen? Dieses Auffangnetz existiert bereits - bekannt als Digital Reference Service, gebündelt durch die Funktionen, die das Web Contact Center bereit hält.
    Date
    22. 9.2005 20:50:31
  5. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.01
    0.010973194 = product of:
      0.04937937 = sum of:
        0.037427433 = product of:
          0.074854866 = sum of:
            0.074854866 = weight(_text_:web in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074854866 = score(doc=2733,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.780033 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011951938 = product of:
          0.023903877 = sum of:
            0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023903877 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    While the Web has grown significantly in recent years, some portions of the Web remain largely underdeveloped, as shown in a lack of high-quality content and functionality. An example is the Arabic Web, in which a lack of well-structured Web directories limits users' ability to browse for Arabic resources. In this research, we proposed an approach to building Web directories for the underdeveloped Web and developed a proof-of-concept prototype called the Arabic Medical Web Directory (AMedDir) that supports browsing of over 5,000 Arabic medical Web sites and pages organized in a hierarchical structure. We conducted an experiment involving Arab participants and found that the AMedDir significantly outperformed two benchmark Arabic Web directories in terms of browsing effectiveness, efficiency, information quality, and user satisfaction. Participants expressed strong preference for the AMedDir and provided many positive comments. This research thus contributes to developing a useful Web directory for organizing the information in the Arabic medical domain and to a better understanding of how to support browsing on the underdeveloped Web.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
  6. Shen, X.; Li, D.; Shen, C.: Evaluating China's university library Web sites using correspondence analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.0104188 = product of:
      0.046884596 = sum of:
        0.030948678 = product of:
          0.061897356 = sum of:
            0.061897356 = weight(_text_:web in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061897356 = score(doc=5277,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, many evaluations of Web sites have been conducted, and relevant researches have also been carried out in academic circles. Correspondence analysis is introduced in this paper to evaluate university library Web sites through building a correspondence analysis model. This paper gives suggestions as to how to construct university library Web sites based on analysis and summary of evaluation results, in a bid to strengthen the construction of university library Web sites.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:40:18
  7. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.01
    0.009925528 = product of:
      0.04466488 = sum of:
        0.020761002 = product of:
          0.041522004 = sum of:
            0.041522004 = weight(_text_:web in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041522004 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023903877 = product of:
          0.047807753 = sum of:
            0.047807753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047807753 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  8. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.01
    0.009863772 = product of:
      0.044386975 = sum of:
        0.024467077 = product of:
          0.048934154 = sum of:
            0.048934154 = weight(_text_:web in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048934154 = score(doc=1066,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019919898 = product of:
          0.039839797 = sum of:
            0.039839797 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039839797 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  9. Panzer, M.: Cool URIs for the DDC : towards Web-scale accessibility of a large classification system (2008) 0.01
    0.009692724 = product of:
      0.043617256 = sum of:
        0.027681338 = product of:
          0.055362675 = sum of:
            0.055362675 = weight(_text_:web in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055362675 = score(doc=2629,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The report discusses metadata strategies employed and problems encountered during the first step of transforming the DDC into a Web information resource. It focuses on the process of URI design, with regard to W3C recommendations and Semantic Web paradigms. Special emphasis is placed on usefulness of the URIs for RESTful web services.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.01
    0.009690818 = product of:
      0.043608684 = sum of:
        0.029664757 = product of:
          0.059329513 = sum of:
            0.059329513 = weight(_text_:web in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059329513 = score(doc=167,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013943928 = product of:
          0.027887857 = sum of:
            0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887857 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Hsu, C.-N.; Chang, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Lu, J.-J.; Chang, C.-C.: Reconfigurable Web wrapper agents for biological information integration (2005) 0.01
    0.008872417 = product of:
      0.039925877 = sum of:
        0.029965928 = product of:
          0.059931856 = sum of:
            0.059931856 = weight(_text_:web in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059931856 = score(doc=5263,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.6245262 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009959949 = product of:
          0.019919898 = sum of:
            0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019919898 = score(doc=5263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of biological data is transferred and exchanged in overwhelming volumes on the World Wide Web. How to rapidly capture, utilize, and integrate the information on the Internet to discover valuable biological knowledge is one of the most critical issues in bioinformatics. Many information integration systems have been proposed for integrating biological data. These systems usually rely on an intermediate software layer called wrappers to access connected information sources. Wrapper construction for Web data sources is often specially hand coded to accommodate the differences between each Web site. However, programming a Web wrapper requires substantial programming skill, and is time-consuming and hard to maintain. In this article we provide a solution for rapidly building software agents that can serve as Web wrappers for biological information integration. We define an XML-based language called Web Navigation Description Language (WNDL), to model a Web-browsing session. A WNDL script describes how to locate the data, extract the data, and combine the data. By executing different WNDL scripts, we can automate virtually all types of Web-browsing sessions. We also describe IEPAD (Information Extraction Based on Pattern Discovery), a data extractor based on pattern discovery techniques. IEPAD allows our software agents to automatically discover the extraction rules to extract the contents of a structurally formatted Web page. With a programming-by-example authoring tool, a user can generate a complete Web wrapper agent by browsing the target Web sites. We built a variety of biological applications to demonstrate the feasibility of our approach.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:36:42
  12. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.008868592 = product of:
      0.039908662 = sum of:
        0.023972742 = product of:
          0.047945485 = sum of:
            0.047945485 = weight(_text_:web in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047945485 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter presents ontologies and their role in the creation of the Semantic Web. Ontologies hold special interest, because they are very closely related to the way we understand the world. They provide common understanding, the very first step to successful communication. In following sections, we will present ontologies, how they are created and used. We will describe available tools for specifying and working with ontologies.
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  13. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.01
    0.0087591475 = product of:
      0.039416164 = sum of:
        0.027464228 = product of:
          0.054928456 = sum of:
            0.054928456 = weight(_text_:web in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054928456 = score(doc=2556,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011951938 = product of:
          0.023903877 = sum of:
            0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023903877 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  14. Mundle, K.; Huie, H.; Bangalore, N.S.: ARL Library Catalog Department Web sites : an evaluative study (2006) 0.01
    0.00858892 = product of:
      0.03865014 = sum of:
        0.028690193 = product of:
          0.057380386 = sum of:
            0.057380386 = weight(_text_:web in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057380386 = score(doc=771,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009959949 = product of:
          0.019919898 = sum of:
            0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019919898 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    User-friendly and content-rich Web sites are indispensable for any knowledge-based organization. Web site evaluation studies point to ways to improve the efficiency and usability of Web sites. Library catalog or technical services department Web sites have proliferated in the past few years, but there is no systematic and accepted method that evaluates the performance of these Web sites. An earlier study by Mundle, Zhao, and Bangalore evaluated catalog department Web sites within the consortium of the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) libraries, proposed a model to assess these Web sites, and recommended desirable features for them. The present study was undertaken to test the model further and to assess the recommended features. The study evaluated the catalog department Web sites of Association of Research Libraries members. It validated the model proposed, and confirmed the use of the performance index (PI) as an objective measure to assess the usability or workability of a catalog department Web site. The model advocates using a PI of 1.5 as the benchmark for catalog department Web site evaluation by employing the study tool and scoring method suggested in this paper.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.01
    0.008481134 = product of:
      0.0381651 = sum of:
        0.02422117 = product of:
          0.04844234 = sum of:
            0.04844234 = weight(_text_:web in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04844234 = score(doc=88,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013943928 = product of:
          0.027887857 = sum of:
            0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887857 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01
    0.008481134 = product of:
      0.0381651 = sum of:
        0.02422117 = product of:
          0.04844234 = sum of:
            0.04844234 = weight(_text_:web in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04844234 = score(doc=2640,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013943928 = product of:
          0.027887857 = sum of:
            0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887857 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.01
    0.008306416 = product of:
      0.03737887 = sum of:
        0.025426934 = product of:
          0.050853867 = sum of:
            0.050853867 = weight(_text_:web in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050853867 = score(doc=177,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011951938 = product of:
          0.023903877 = sum of:
            0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023903877 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  18. Herrera-Viedma, E.; Pasi, G.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Porcel; C.: Evaluating the information quality of Web sites : a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words (2006) 0.01
    0.008292217 = product of:
      0.037314974 = sum of:
        0.027355025 = product of:
          0.05471005 = sum of:
            0.05471005 = weight(_text_:web in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05471005 = score(doc=5286,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009959949 = product of:
          0.019919898 = sum of:
            0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019919898 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    An evaluation methodology based on fuzzy computing with words aimed at measuring the information quality of Web sites containing documents is presented. This methodology is qualitative and user oriented because it generates linguistic recommendations on the information quality of the content-based Web sites based on users' perceptions. It is composed of two main components, an evaluation scheme to analyze the information quality of Web sites and a measurement method to generate the linguistic recommendations. The evaluation scheme is based on both technical criteria related to the Web site structure and criteria related to the content of information on the Web sites. It is user driven because the chosen criteria are easily understandable by the users, in such a way that Web visitors can assess them by means of linguistic evaluation judgments. The measurement method is user centered because it generates linguistic recommendations of the Web sites based on the visitors' linguistic evaluation judgments. To combine the linguistic evaluation judgments we introduce two new majority guided linguistic aggregation operators, the Majority guided Linguistic Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (MLIOWA) and weighted MLIOWA operators, which generate the linguistic recommendations according to the majority of the evaluation judgments provided by different visitors. The use of this methodology could improve tasks such as information filtering and evaluation on the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:05:46
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web
  19. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.01
    0.008292217 = product of:
      0.037314974 = sum of:
        0.027355025 = product of:
          0.05471005 = sum of:
            0.05471005 = weight(_text_:web in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05471005 = score(doc=586,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009959949 = product of:
          0.019919898 = sum of:
            0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019919898 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  20. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.00808388 = product of:
      0.03637746 = sum of:
        0.013840669 = product of:
          0.027681338 = sum of:
            0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027681338 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022536792 = product of:
          0.045073584 = sum of:
            0.045073584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045073584 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181

Types

Themes