-
Khiat, A.; Benaissa, M.: Approach for instance-based ontology alignment : using argument and event structures of generative lexicon (2014)
0.08
0.0822789 = product of:
0.123418346 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
0.0116979815 = product of:
0.035093945 = sum of:
0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035093945 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.120-127
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Vukadin, A.: Development of a classification-oriented authority control : the experience of the National and University Library in Zagreb (2015)
0.08
0.0822789 = product of:
0.123418346 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
0.0116979815 = product of:
0.035093945 = sum of:
0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035093945 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.111-120
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Rorissa, A.; Yuan, X.: Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval (2012)
0.08
0.0822789 = product of:
0.123418346 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=2744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
0.0116979815 = product of:
0.035093945 = sum of:
0.035093945 = weight(_text_:29 in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035093945 = score(doc=2744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2016 19:20:01
- Source
- Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.1, S.120-135
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.08
0.08220875 = product of:
0.12331312 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.011592751 = product of:
0.034778252 = sum of:
0.034778252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034778252 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.08
0.08220875 = product of:
0.12331312 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.011592751 = product of:
0.034778252 = sum of:
0.034778252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034778252 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
-
Clewley, N.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, X.: Cognitive styles and search engine preferences : field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism (2010)
0.07
0.068565756 = product of:
0.10284863 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
0.009748319 = product of:
0.029244956 = sum of:
0.029244956 = weight(_text_:29 in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029244956 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Cognitive style has been identified to be significantly influential in deciding users' preferences of search engines. In particular, Witkin's field dependence/independence has been widely studied in the area of web searching. It has been suggested that this cognitive style has conceptual links with the holism/serialism. This study aims to investigate the differences between the field dependence/independence and holism/serialism. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical study was conducted with 120 students from a UK university. Riding's cognitive style analysis (CSA) and Ford's study preference questionnaire (SPQ) were used to identify the students' cognitive styles. A questionnaire was designed to identify users' preferences for the design of search engines. Data mining techniques were applied to analyse the data obtained from the empirical study. Findings - The results highlight three findings. First, a fundamental link is confirmed between the two cognitive styles. Second, the relationship between field dependent users and holists is suggested to be more prominent than that of field independent users and serialists. Third, the interface design preferences of field dependent and field independent users can be split more clearly than those of holists and serialists. Originality/value - The contributions of this study include a deeper understanding of the similarities and differences between field dependence/independence and holists/serialists as well as proposing a novel methodology for data analyses.
- Date
- 29. 8.2010 13:11:47
-
Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014)
0.07
0.06850729 = product of:
0.10276093 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.009660627 = product of:
0.02898188 = sum of:
0.02898188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898188 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.114-120
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Silva, E.M. da: Comparing the use of full text search between a conventional IR System and a DBMS (2018)
0.05
0.049653497 = product of:
0.14896049 = sum of:
0.14896049 = weight(_text_:120 in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14896049 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.5547564 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.120-127
-
Dandan, Z.; Zheng, D.; Dongfeng, Q.: ¬A survey of RDA in Asia and a vision for future development (2019)
0.04
0.04344681 = product of:
0.13034043 = sum of:
0.13034043 = weight(_text_:120 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13034043 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.48541185 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.2/3, S.106-120
-
Calster, B. Van: It takes time : a remarkable example of delayed recognition (2012)
0.04
0.037240125 = product of:
0.11172037 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The way in which scientific publications are picked up by the research community can vary. Some articles become instantly cited, whereas others go unnoticed for some time before they are discovered or rediscovered. Papers with delayed recognition have also been labeled "sleeping beauties." I briefly discuss an extreme case of a sleeping beauty. Peirce's short note in Science in 1884 shows a remarkable increase in citations since around 2000. The note received less than 1 citation per year in the decades prior to 2000, 3.5 citations per year in the 2000s, and 10.4 in the 2010s. This increase was seen in several domains, most notably meteorology, medical prediction research, and economics. The paper outlines formulas to evaluate a binary prediction system for a binary outcome. This citation increase in various domains may be attributed to a widespread, growing research focus on mathematical prediction systems and the evaluation thereof. Several recently suggested evaluation measures essentially reinvented or extended Peirce's 120-year-old ideas.
-
Sequeda, J.F.: Integrating relational databases with the Semantic Web : a reflection (2017)
0.04
0.037240125 = product of:
0.11172037 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 3935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=3935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 3935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3935)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.68-120
-
Lu, T.; Xu, Y.(C.); Wallace, S.: Internet usage and patient's trust in physician during diagnoses : a knowledge power perspective (2018)
0.04
0.037240125 = product of:
0.11172037 = sum of:
0.11172037 = weight(_text_:120 in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11172037 = score(doc=4014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.4160673 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.110-120
-
Sauperl, S.A.: UDC as a standardisation method for providing titles of documents (2015)
0.03
0.031054314 = product of:
0.09316294 = sum of:
0.09316294 = product of:
0.1397444 = sum of:
0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07018789 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
0.069556504 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069556504 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10.11.2015 10:22:31
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: User verification of the FRBR conceptual model (2012)
0.03
0.031033438 = product of:
0.09310031 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to build on of a previous study of mental models of the bibliographic universe, which found that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model is intuitive. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 120 participants were presented with a list of bibliographic entities and six graphs each. They were asked to choose the graph they thought best represented the relationships between entities described. Findings - The graph based on the FRBR model was chosen by more than half of the participants and none of the alternatives stood out. This gives further indication that FRBR is an appropriate model of the bibliographic universe from users' standpoint. Research limitations/implications - The study only looked at the textual part of the bibliographic universe. Further research is needed for other types of materials. Practical implications - This research suggests that there should be a more positive attitude towards implementation of FRBR-based catalogues. Originality/value - This is one of only a handful of user studies relating to FRBR, which looks to be the backbone of catalogues for years to come. As such, the results should be of interest to everybody involved with catalogues, from cataloguers to the end-users.
-
Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Luo, X.; Lin, S.: ¬A new algorithm for product image search based on salient edge characterization (2014)
0.03
0.031033438 = product of:
0.09310031 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Visually assisted product image search has gained increasing popularity because of its capability to greatly improve end users' e-commerce shopping experiences. Different from general-purpose content-based image retrieval (CBIR) applications, the specific goal of product image search is to retrieve and rank relevant products from a large-scale product database to visually assist a user's online shopping experience. In this paper, we explore the problem of product image search through salient edge characterization and analysis, for which we propose a novel image search method coupled with an interactive user region-of-interest indication function. Given a product image, the proposed approach first extracts an edge map, based on which contour curves are further extracted. We then segment the extracted contours into fragments according to the detected contour corners. After that, a set of salient edge elements is extracted from each product image. Based on salient edge elements matching and similarity evaluation, the method derives a new pairwise image similarity estimate. Using the new image similarity, we can then retrieve product images. To evaluate the performance of our algorithm, we conducted 120 sessions of querying experiments on a data set comprised of around 13k product images collected from multiple, real-world e-commerce websites. We compared the performance of the proposed method with that of a bag-of-words method (Philbin, Chum, Isard, Sivic, & Zisserman, 2008) and a Pyramid Histogram of Orientated Gradients (PHOG) method (Bosch, Zisserman, & Munoz, 2007). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the performance of example-based product image retrieval.
-
Wakeling, S.; Clough, P.; Connaway, L.S.; Sen, B.; Tomás, D.: Users and uses of a global union catalog : a mixed-methods study of WorldCat.org (2017)
0.03
0.031033438 = product of:
0.09310031 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=3794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the first large-scale investigation of the users and uses of WorldCat.org, the world's largest bibliographic database and global union catalog. Using a mixed-methods approach involving focus group interviews with 120 participants, an online survey with 2,918 responses, and an analysis of transaction logs of approximately 15 million sessions from WorldCat.org, the study provides a new understanding of the context for global union catalog use. We find that WorldCat.org is accessed by a diverse population, with the three primary user groups being librarians, students, and academics. Use of the system is found to fall within three broad types of work-task (professional, academic, and leisure), and we also present an emergent taxonomy of search tasks that encompass known-item, unknown-item, and institutional information searches. Our results support the notion that union catalogs are primarily used for known-item searches, although the volume of traffic to WorldCat.org means that unknown-item searches nonetheless represent an estimated 250,000 sessions per month. Search engine referrals account for almost half of all traffic, but although WorldCat.org effectively connects users referred from institutional library catalogs to other libraries holding a sought item, users arriving from a search engine are less likely to connect to a library.
-
Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019)
0.03
0.031033438 = product of:
0.09310031 = sum of:
0.09310031 = weight(_text_:120 in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09310031 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.34672275 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.1, S.120-139
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.02
0.02264974 = product of:
0.06794922 = sum of:
0.06794922 = product of:
0.20384765 = sum of:
0.20384765 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20384765 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3627066 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Mazzucchelli, A.; Sartori , F.: String similarity in CBR platforms : a preliminary study (2014)
0.02
0.02188371 = product of:
0.065651126 = sum of:
0.065651126 = product of:
0.098476686 = sum of:
0.057902057 = weight(_text_:29 in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057902057 = score(doc=1568,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
0.04057463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04057463 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-29
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.02
0.020702874 = product of:
0.06210862 = sum of:
0.06210862 = product of:
0.09316293 = sum of:
0.046791926 = weight(_text_:29 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046791926 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046371005 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04278204 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
