Search (86 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04
    0.03871879 = product of:
      0.096796975 = sum of:
        0.05531256 = product of:
          0.16593768 = sum of:
            0.16593768 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16593768 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2952533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.04148442 = product of:
          0.16593768 = sum of:
            0.16593768 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16593768 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2952533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.01
    0.012969497 = product of:
      0.032423742 = sum of:
        0.020627711 = weight(_text_:u in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020627711 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.01179603 = product of:
          0.02359206 = sum of:
            0.02359206 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02359206 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121953934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied. Findings The intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option. Research limitations/implications This study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way. Originality/value This study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Balakrishnan, U,; Soergel, D.; Helfer, O.: Representing concepts through description logic expressions for knowledge organization system (KOS) mapping (2020) 0.01
    0.008251085 = product of:
      0.041255422 = sum of:
        0.041255422 = weight(_text_:u in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041255422 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  4. Babcock, K.; Lee, S.; Rajakumar, J.; Wagner, A.: Providing access to digital collections (2020) 0.01
    0.0071456493 = product of:
      0.035728246 = sum of:
        0.035728246 = weight(_text_:u in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035728246 = score(doc=5855,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The University of Toronto Libraries is currently reviewing technology to support its Collections U of T service. Collections U of T provides search and browse access to 375 digital collections (and over 203,000 digital objects) at the University of Toronto Libraries. Digital objects typically include special collections material from the university as well as faculty digital collections, all with unique metadata requirements. The service is currently supported by IIIF-enabled Islandora, with one Fedora back end and multiple Drupal sites per parent collection (see attached image). Like many institutions making use of Islandora, UTL is now confronted with Drupal 7 end of life and has begun to investigate a migration path forward. This article will summarise the Collections U of T functional requirements and lessons learned from our current technology stack. It will go on to outline our research to date for alternate solutions. The article will review both emerging micro-service solutions, as well as out-of-the-box platforms, to provide an overview of the digital collection technology landscape in 2019. Note that our research is focused on reviewing technology solutions for providing access to digital collections, as preservation services are offered through other services at the University of Toronto Libraries.
  5. Deng, Z.; Deng, Z.; Fan, G.; Wang, B.; Fan, W.(P.); Liu, S.: More is better? : understanding the effects of online interactions on patients health anxiety (2023) 0.01
    0.0071456493 = product of:
      0.035728246 = sum of:
        0.035728246 = weight(_text_:u in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035728246 = score(doc=1082,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Online health platforms play an important role in chronic disease management. Patients participate in online health platforms to receive and provide health-related support from each other. However, there remains a debate about whether the influence of social interaction on patient health anxiety is linearly positive. Based on uncertainty, information overload, and the theory of motivational information management, we develop and test a model considering a potential curvilinear relationship between social interaction and health anxiety, as well as a moderating effect of health literacy. We collect patient interaction data from an online health platform based on chronic disease management in China and use text mining and econometrics to test our hypotheses. Specifically, we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between informational provision and health anxiety. Our results also show that information receipt and emotion provision have U-shaped relationships with health anxiety. Interestingly, health literacy can effectively alleviate the U-shaped relationship between information receipt and health anxiety. These findings not only provide new insights into the literature on online patient interactions but also provide decision support for patients and platform managers.
  6. Moulaison-Sandy, H.; Adkins, D.; Bossaller, J.; Cho, H.: ¬An automated approach to describing fiction : a methodology to use book reviews to identify affect (2021) 0.01
    0.0061801486 = product of:
      0.030900743 = sum of:
        0.030900743 = product of:
          0.061801486 = sum of:
            0.061801486 = weight(_text_:literatur in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061801486 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16682008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.3704679 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  7. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.01
    0.0052972706 = product of:
      0.026486352 = sum of:
        0.026486352 = product of:
          0.052972704 = sum of:
            0.052972704 = weight(_text_:literatur in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052972704 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16682008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.31754392 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  8. Zavalin, V.: Exploration of subject and genre representation in bibliographic metadata representing works of fiction for children and young adults (2024) 0.01
    0.0052972706 = product of:
      0.026486352 = sum of:
        0.026486352 = product of:
          0.052972704 = sum of:
            0.052972704 = weight(_text_:literatur in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052972704 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16682008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.31754392 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  9. Lee, Y.-Y.; Ke, H.; Yen, T.-Y.; Huang, H.-H.; Chen, H.-H.: Combining and learning word embedding with WordNet for semantic relatedness and similarity measurement (2020) 0.00
    0.0049506505 = product of:
      0.024753252 = sum of:
        0.024753252 = weight(_text_:u in 5871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024753252 = score(doc=5871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5871)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  10. Hoeber, O.: ¬A study of visually linked keywords to support exploratory browsing in academic search (2022) 0.00
    0.0049506505 = product of:
      0.024753252 = sum of:
        0.024753252 = weight(_text_:u in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024753252 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  11. Liang, Z.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Bias against scientific novelty : a prepublication perspective (2023) 0.00
    0.0049506505 = product of:
      0.024753252 = sum of:
        0.024753252 = weight(_text_:u in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024753252 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Novel ideas often experience resistance from incumbent forces. While evidence of the bias against novelty has been widely identified in science, there is still a lack of large-scale quantitative work to study this problem occurring in the prepublication process of manuscripts. This paper examines the association between manuscript novelty and handling time of publication based on 778,345 articles in 1,159 journals indexed by PubMed. Measuring the novelty as the extent to which manuscripts disrupt existing knowledge, we found systematic evidence that higher novelty is associated with longer handling time. Matching and fixed-effect models were adopted to confirm the statistical significance of this pattern. Moreover, submissions from prestigious authors and institutions have the advantage of shorter handling time, but this advantage is diminishing as manuscript novelty increases. In addition, we found longer handling time is negatively related to the impact of manuscripts, while the relationships between novelty and 3- and 5-year citations are U-shape. This study expands the existing knowledge of the novelty bias by examining its existence in the prepublication process of manuscripts.
  12. Varadarajan, U.; Dutta, B.: Models for narrative information : a study (2022) 0.00
    0.0049506505 = product of:
      0.024753252 = sum of:
        0.024753252 = weight(_text_:u in 1102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024753252 = score(doc=1102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1102)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.00
    0.004718412 = product of:
      0.02359206 = sum of:
        0.02359206 = product of:
          0.04718412 = sum of:
            0.04718412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04718412 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121953934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  14. Ruotsalo, T.; Jacucci, G.; Kaski, S.: Interactive faceted query suggestion for exploratory search : whole-session effectiveness and interaction engagement (2020) 0.00
    0.0041255425 = product of:
      0.020627711 = sum of:
        0.020627711 = weight(_text_:u in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020627711 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  15. Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Cai, X.; Du, Q.; Fan, W.: ¬The more, the better? : The effect of feedback and user's past successes on idea implementation in open innovation communities (2022) 0.00
    0.0041255425 = product of:
      0.020627711 = sum of:
        0.020627711 = weight(_text_:u in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020627711 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Establishing open innovation communities has evolved as an important product innovation and development strategy for companies. Yet, the success of such communities relies on the successful implementation of many user-submitted ideas. Although extant literature has examined the impact of user experience and idea characteristics on idea implementation, little is known from the information input perspective, for example, feedback. Based on the information overload theory and knowledge content framework, we propose that the amount and types of feedback content have different effects on the likelihood of subsequent idea implementation, and such effects depend on the level of users' success experience. We tested the research model using a panel logistic model with the data of MIUI Forum. The study results revealed that the amount of feedback has an inverted U-shaped effect on idea implementation, and such effect is moderated by a user's past success. Moreover, the type of feedback content (cost and benefit-related feedback and functionality-related feedback) positively affects idea implementation, and a user's past success positively moderated the above effects. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications, limitations of our research, and suggestions for future research.
  16. Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023) 0.00
    0.0041255425 = product of:
      0.020627711 = sum of:
        0.020627711 = weight(_text_:u in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020627711 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11403506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034825776 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.00
    0.0037747293 = product of:
      0.018873647 = sum of:
        0.018873647 = product of:
          0.037747294 = sum of:
            0.037747294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037747294 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121953934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  18. Becnel, K.; Moeller, R.A.: Graphic novels in the school library : questions of cataloging, classification, and arrangement (2022) 0.00
    0.0035315135 = product of:
      0.017657567 = sum of:
        0.017657567 = product of:
          0.035315134 = sum of:
            0.035315134 = weight(_text_:literatur in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035315134 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16682008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.21169594 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  19. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.00
    0.0033028882 = product of:
      0.016514441 = sum of:
        0.016514441 = product of:
          0.033028882 = sum of:
            0.033028882 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033028882 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121953934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  20. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.00
    0.0033028882 = product of:
      0.016514441 = sum of:
        0.016514441 = product of:
          0.033028882 = sum of:
            0.033028882 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033028882 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121953934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034825776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26

Types