Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.13293044 = product of:
  0.31017104 = sum of:
    0.027122704 = weight(_text_:information in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027122704 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
    0.08053202 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08053202 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.7073872 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
    0.20251632 = weight(_text_:kongress in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20251632 = score(doc=5393,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24693015 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

LCSH

Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Research / Congresses

RSWK

Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>

Subject

Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>

0.0072660116 = product of:
  0.025431039 = sum of:
    0.006407136 = weight(_text_:information in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006407136 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
    0.019023903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019023903 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Over the past ten years, various organizations, both public and private, have expressed interest in implementing FAST in their cataloging workflows. As interest in FAST has grown, so too has interest in knowing how FAST is being used and by whom. Since 2002 eighteen institutions (see table 1) in six countries have expressed interest in learning more about FAST and how it could be implemented in cataloging workflows. Currently OCLC is aware of nine agencies that have actually adopted or support FAST for resource description. This study, the first systematic census of FAST users undertaken by OCLC, was conducted, in part, to address these inquiries. Its purpose was to examine: how FAST is being utilized; why FAST was chosen as the cataloging vocabulary; what benefits FAST provides; and what can be done to enhance the value of FAST. Interview requests were sent to all parties that had previously contacted OCLC about FAST. Of the eighteen organizations contacted, sixteen agreed to provide information about their decision whether to use FAST (nine adopters, seven non-adopters).

Theme

Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

0.00291377 = product of:
  0.020396389 = sum of:
    0.020396389 = product of:
      0.061189163 = sum of:
        0.061189163 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061189163 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

16. 7.2002 20:22:55

0.0018306104 = product of:
  0.012814272 = sum of:
    0.012814272 = weight(_text_:information in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012814272 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Footnote

Rez. in: International journal of information management. 17(1997) no.6, S.470-472 (T. Wilson)

0.0018306104 = product of:
  0.012814272 = sum of:
    0.012814272 = weight(_text_:information in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012814272 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Imprint

Baltimore : National Information Standards Organization

0.0017366696 = product of:
  0.012156687 = sum of:
    0.012156687 = weight(_text_:information in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012156687 = score(doc=3380,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.18400162 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

In April 2010, Bill Gates gave a talk at MIT in which he asked: 'are the brightest minds working on the most important problems?' Gates meant improving the lives of the poorest; improving education, health, and nutrition. We could easily add improving peaceful interactions, human rights, environmental conditions, living standards and so on. Philosophy of Information (PI) proponents think that Gates has a point - but this doesn't mean we should all give up philosophy. Philosophy can be part of this project, because philosophy understood as conceptual design forges and refines the new ideas, theories, and perspectives that we need to understand and address these important problems that press us so urgently. Of course, this naturally invites us to wonder which ideas, theories, and perspectives philosophers should be designing now. In our global information society, many crucial challenges are linked to information and communication technologies: the constant search for novel solutions and improvements demands, in turn, changing conceptual resources to understand and cope with them. Rapid technological development now pervades communication, education, work, entertainment, industrial production and business, healthcare, social relations and armed conflicts. There is a rich mine of philosophical work to do on the new concepts created right here, right now.
Philosophy "done informationally" has been around a long time, but PI as a discipline is quite new. PI takes age-old philosophical debates and engages them with up-to-the minute conceptual issues generated by our ever-changing, information-laden world. This alters the philosophical debates, and makes them interesting to many more people - including many philosophically-minded people who aren't subscribing philosophers. We, the authors, are young researchers who think of our work as part of PI, taking this engaged approach. We're excited by it and want to teach it. Students are excited by it and want to study it. Writing a traditional textbook takes a while, and PI is moving quickly. A traditional textbook doesn't seem like the right approach for the philosophy of the information age. So we got together to take a new approach, team-writing this electronic text to make it available more rapidly and openly.

Content

Vgl. auch unter: http://www.socphilinfo.org/teaching/book-pi-intro: "This book serves as the main reference for an undergraduate course on Philosophy of Information. The book is written to be accessible to the typical undergraduate student of Philosophy and does not require propaedeutic courses in Logic, Epistemology or Ethics. Each chapter includes a rich collection of references for the student interested in furthering her understanding of the topics reviewed in the book. The book covers all the main topics of the Philosophy of Information and it should be considered an overview and not a comprehensive, in-depth analysis of a philosophical area. As a consequence, 'The Philosophy of Information: a Simple Introduction' does not contain research material as it is not aimed at graduate students or researchers. The book is available for free in multiple formats and it is updated every twelve months by the team of the p Research Network: Patrick Allo, Bert Baumgaertner, Anthony Beavers, Simon D'Alfonso, Penny Driscoll, Luciano Floridi, Nir Fresco, Carson Grubaugh, Phyllis Illari, Eric Kerr, Giuseppe Primiero, Federica Russo, Christoph Schulz, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Matteo Turilli, Orlin Vakarelov. (*) The version for 2013 is now available as a pdf. The content of this version will soon be integrated in the redesign of the teaching-section. The beta-version from last year will provisionally remain accessible through the Table of Content on this page."

Theme

Information

9.153052E-4 = product of:
  0.006407136 = sum of:
    0.006407136 = weight(_text_:information in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006407136 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Informations- und Wissensvermittlung verlagern sich immer stärker in die digitale Welt. Möglich wird dies nicht zuletzt durch die voranschreitende Durchdringung aller Lebensbereiche durch das Internet. Wissen wird mehr und mehr zu vernetztem Wissen. Die Jülicher Konferenz WissKom2012 thematisiert die Anpassung an diese Entwicklung und ihre Mitgestaltung durch innovative Bibliotheksdienstleistungen. Der Konferenztitel "Vernetztes Wissen: Daten, Menschen, Systeme" deutet die wechselseitige Vernetzung unter- und miteinander an. Ziel ist, vorhandene Insellösungen zu verbinden und neue Konzepte für inhärent vernetzte Strukturen zu entwickeln. Mit der WissKom2012 "Vernetztes Wissen - Daten, Menschen, Systeme" greift die Zentralbibliothek des Forschungszentrums Jülich erneut Themen im Spannungsfeld von "Bibliothek - Information - Wissenschaft" in einer Konferenz interdisziplinär auf und versucht, neue Handlungsfelder für Bibliotheken aufzuzeigen. Diese sechste Konferenz der Zentralbibliothek thematisiert den immer wichtiger werdenden Bereich der Forschungsdaten und den nachhaltigen Umgang mit ihnen. Sie zeigt auf, was Interdisziplinarität konkret bedeutet und wie bislang isolierte Systeme vernetzt werden können und so Mehrwert entsteht. Der Konferenzband enthält neben den Ausführungen der Referenten zudem die Beiträge der Poster Session sowie den Festvortrag von Prof. Viktor Mayer-Schönberger mit dem Titel "Delete: Die Tugend des Vergessens in digitalen Zeiten".

7.322442E-4 = product of:
  0.0051257093 = sum of:
    0.0051257093 = weight(_text_:information in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051257093 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Theme

Information