Search (123 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.03
    0.03336741 = product of:
      0.06673482 = sum of:
        0.06673482 = product of:
          0.10010222 = sum of:
            0.013307921 = weight(_text_:a in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307921 = score(doc=6021,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
            0.0867943 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867943 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
    Type
    a
  2. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.03
    0.02748698 = product of:
      0.05497396 = sum of:
        0.05497396 = product of:
          0.08246094 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
            0.07439512 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07439512 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  3. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.02
    0.018324653 = product of:
      0.036649305 = sum of:
        0.036649305 = product of:
          0.054973956 = sum of:
            0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053772116 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The CD-ROM version of the 20th DDC ed., featuring advanced online search and windowing techniques, full-text indexing, personal notepad, LC subject headings linked to DDC numbers and a database of all DDC changes
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17
  4. Goble, A.: ¬The international film index on CD-ROM (1996) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.186-187 (W. Ubbens)
  5. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.017602425 = product of:
      0.03520485 = sum of:
        0.03520485 = product of:
          0.05280727 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  6. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.016650246 = product of:
      0.033300493 = sum of:
        0.033300493 = product of:
          0.049950738 = sum of:
            0.012753177 = weight(_text_:a in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012753177 = score(doc=2655,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
            0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03719756 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  7. Bookscape (1996) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=4451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=4451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. zur Oberfläche und zu der Art der Suchmöglichkeiten: auch http://www.amazon.com. - Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 49(1996) H.2, S.136-139 (M. Wieser, A. Jahn)
  8. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.01
    0.012399187 = product of:
      0.024798375 = sum of:
        0.024798375 = product of:
          0.07439512 = sum of:
            0.07439512 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07439512 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
  9. Schmid, H.: Improvements in Part-of-Speech tagging with an application to German (1995) 0.01
    0.012329447 = product of:
      0.024658894 = sum of:
        0.024658894 = product of:
          0.03698834 = sum of:
            0.012023811 = weight(_text_:a in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012023811 = score(doc=124,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a couple of extensions to a basic Markov Model tagger (called TreeTagger) which improve its accuracy when trained on small corpora. The basic tagger was originally developed for English Schmid, 1994. The extensions together reduced error rates on a German test corpus by more than a third.
    Type
    a
  10. World guide to libraries plus (1996-) 0.01
    0.010401888 = product of:
      0.020803776 = sum of:
        0.020803776 = product of:
          0.062411327 = sum of:
            0.062411327 = weight(_text_:h in 5424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062411327 = score(doc=5424,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 5424, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5424)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. der 2., erw. Ausg. in: ZfBB 45(1998) H.12, S.651-656 (H. Rösch); Rez. der Ausg. 2000 in; ZfBB 47(2000) H.5, S.503-506 (H. Rösch)
  11. Thiele, H.: ¬The Dublin Core and Warwick framework : a review of the literature, March 1995 - September 1997 (1998) 0.01
    0.009247085 = product of:
      0.01849417 = sum of:
        0.01849417 = product of:
          0.027741255 = sum of:
            0.009017859 = weight(_text_:a in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009017859 = score(doc=1254,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this essay is to identify and explore the dynamics of the literature associated with the Dublin Core Workshop Series. The essay opens by identifying the problems that the Dublin Core Workshop Series is addressing, the status of the Internet at the time of the first workshop, and the contributions each workshop has made to the ongoing discussion. The body of the essay describes the characteristics of the literature, highlights key documents, and identifies the major researchers. The essay closes with evaluation of the literary trends and considerations of future research directions. The essay concludes that a shift from a descriptive emphasis to a more empirical form of literature is about to take place. Future research questions are identified in the areas of satisfying searcher needs, the impact of surrogate descriptions on search engine performance, and the effectiveness of surrogate descriptions in authenticating Internet resources.
    Type
    a
  12. Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 2: SFX, a generic linking solution (1999) 0.01
    0.008743494 = product of:
      0.017486988 = sum of:
        0.017486988 = product of:
          0.02623048 = sum of:
            0.010627648 = weight(_text_:a in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010627648 = score(doc=1241,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
            0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015602832 = score(doc=1241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is the second part of two articles about reference linking in hybrid digital libraries. The first part, Frameworks for Linking described the current state-of-the-art and contrasted various approaches to the problem. It identified static and dynamic linking solutions, as well as open and closed linking frameworks. It also included an extensive bibliography. The second part describes our work at the University of Ghent to address these issues. SFX is a generic linking system that we have developed for our own needs, but its underlying concepts can be applied in a wide range of digital libraries. This is a description of the approach to the creation of extended services in a hybrid library environment that has been taken by the Library Automation team at the University of Ghent. The ongoing research has been grouped under the working title Special Effects (SFX). In order to explain the SFX-concepts in a comprehensive way, the discussion will start with a brief description of pre-SFX experiments. Thereafter, the basics of the SFX-approach are explained briefly, in combination with concrete implementation choices taken for the Elektron SFX-linking experiment. Elektron was the name of a modest digital library collaboration between the Universities of Ghent, Louvain and Antwerp.
    Type
    a
  13. El-Ramly, N.; Peterson. R.E.; Volonino, L.: Top ten Web sites using search engines : the case of the desalination industry (1996) 0.01
    0.008142265 = product of:
      0.01628453 = sum of:
        0.01628453 = product of:
          0.024426792 = sum of:
            0.0057033943 = weight(_text_:a in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0057033943 = score(doc=945,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The desalination industry involves the desalting of sea or brackish water and achieves the purpose of increasing the worls's effective water supply. There are approximately 4.000 desalination Web sites. The six major Internet search engines were used to determine, according to each of the six, the top twenty sites for desalination. Each site was visited and the 120 gross returns were pared down to the final ten - the 'Top Ten'. The Top Ten were then analyzed to determine what it was that made the sites useful and informative. The major attributes were: a) currency (up-to-date); b) search site capability; c) access to articles on desalination; d) newsletters; e) databases; f) product information; g) online conferencing; h) valuable links to other sites; l) communication links; j) site maps; and k) case studies. Reasons for having a Web site and the current status and prospects for Internet commerce are discussed
  14. Chen, H.: Semantic research for digital libraries (1999) 0.01
    0.008142265 = product of:
      0.01628453 = sum of:
        0.01628453 = product of:
          0.024426792 = sum of:
            0.0057033943 = weight(_text_:a in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0057033943 = score(doc=1247,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this era of the Internet and distributed, multimedia computing, new and emerging classes of information systems applications have swept into the lives of office workers and people in general. From digital libraries, multimedia systems, geographic information systems, and collaborative computing to electronic commerce, virtual reality, and electronic video arts and games, these applications have created tremendous opportunities for information and computer science researchers and practitioners. As applications become more pervasive, pressing, and diverse, several well-known information retrieval (IR) problems have become even more urgent. Information overload, a result of the ease of information creation and transmission via the Internet and WWW, has become more troublesome (e.g., even stockbrokers and elementary school students, heavily exposed to various WWW search engines, are versed in such IR terminology as recall and precision). Significant variations in database formats and structures, the richness of information media (text, audio, and video), and an abundance of multilingual information content also have created severe information interoperability problems -- structural interoperability, media interoperability, and multilingual interoperability.
    Type
    a
  15. Delsey, T.: ¬The logical structure of the Anglo-American cataloguing rules : Drafted for the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR by Tom Delsey ... (1998) 0.01
    0.0073552458 = product of:
      0.0147104915 = sum of:
        0.0147104915 = product of:
          0.044131473 = sum of:
            0.044131473 = weight(_text_:h in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044131473 = score(doc=3005,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 47(2000) H.1, S.102-105 (H. Wiese)
  16. Microsoft cinemania : the best-selling interactive guide to movies and the moviemakers (1997) 0.01
    0.007281321 = product of:
      0.014562642 = sum of:
        0.014562642 = product of:
          0.043687925 = sum of:
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.183-194 (W. Ubbens)
  17. ¬The motion picture guide : complete information on over ... titles; the interactive movie guide (1995) 0.01
    0.007281321 = product of:
      0.014562642 = sum of:
        0.014562642 = product of:
          0.043687925 = sum of:
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=1205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.187-188 (W. Ubbens)
  18. Fischer Weltalmanach : Zahlen, Daten, Fakten (1998) 0.01
    0.007281321 = product of:
      0.014562642 = sum of:
        0.014562642 = product of:
          0.043687925 = sum of:
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.224-227 (S. Hedrich)
  19. ¬Der digitale Fischer Weltalmanach (1999) 0.01
    0.007281321 = product of:
      0.014562642 = sum of:
        0.014562642 = product of:
          0.043687925 = sum of:
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 50(1999) H.6, S.374 (M. Ockenfeld)
  20. Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 1: frameworks for linking (1999) 0.01
    0.006849361 = product of:
      0.013698722 = sum of:
        0.013698722 = product of:
          0.020548083 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=1244,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
            0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012482265 = score(doc=1244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Currently, both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major domain for innovation enabled by digital communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information. This is the first of two articles in D-Lib Magazine on this topic. This first part describes the current state-of-the-art and contrasts various approaches to the problem. It identifies static and dynamic linking solutions as well as open and closed linking frameworks. It also includes an extensive bibliography. The second part, SFX, a Generic Linking Solution describes a system that we have developed for linking in a hybrid working environment. The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Although most writings on electronic scientific communication have touted other benefits, such as the increase in communication speed, the possibility to exchange multimedia content and the absence of limitations on the length of research papers, currently both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major opportunity for improved communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added-value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information.
    Type
    a

Authors

Types

  • a 46
  • i 18
  • b 5
  • m 3
  • r 3
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications