Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04 
    0.04493916 = product of:
  0.08987832 = sum of:
    0.08987832 = product of:
      0.35951328 = sum of:
        0.35951328 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35951328 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3838097 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Wong, W.; Liu, W.; Bennamoun, M.: Ontology learning from text : a look back and into the future (2010) 0.03 
    0.031215612 = product of:
  0.062431224 = sum of:
    0.062431224 = product of:
      0.12486245 = sum of:
        0.12486245 = weight(_text_:x in 4733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12486245 = score(doc=4733,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.65316284 = fieldWeight in 4733, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Pre-publication version für: ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. X, No. X, Article X, Publication date: X 2011.
  3. Brembs, B.: So your institute went cold turkey on publisher X : what now? (2016) 0.02 
    0.018919518 = product of:
  0.037839036 = sum of:
    0.037839036 = product of:
      0.07567807 = sum of:
        0.07567807 = weight(_text_:x in 3562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07567807 = score(doc=3562,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.39587647 = fieldWeight in 3562, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/12/so-your-institute-went-cold-turkey-on-publisher-x-what-now/
  4. RDA Toolkit (2) : August 2017 (2017) 0.02 
    0.018919518 = product of:
  0.037839036 = sum of:
    0.037839036 = product of:
      0.07567807 = sum of:
        0.07567807 = weight(_text_:x in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07567807 = score(doc=3995,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.39587647 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Am 8. August 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/august2017release> erschienen. Mit diesem Release ist die deutsche Übersetzung auf demselben Stand wie die englische Originalausgabe vom April 2017. Alle Änderungen aus dem Proposalverfahren 2016 und auch aus den Fast Tracks (für kleinere Änderungen) sind eingearbeitet und übersetzt. Ebenfalls aktualisiert wurden Glossar und RDA Registry<http://www.rdaregistry.info/>. Die deutsche Übersetzung ist im Zeitplan des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign Projekt). Alle anderen Übersetzungen des RDA Toolkits werden später im Jahr folgen. Die Änderungsdokumentation für das August-Release des RDA Toolkit finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/3xLSBg>. Aktualisiert wurden auch die von der Fachgruppe Erschließung (FG E) kooperativ erarbeiteten Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH). Diese sind auch in Französisch abrufbar. Eine Gesamtübersicht der D-A-CH AWR pro Kapitel ist im RDA Toolkit unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen". Die Änderungsdokumentation der D-A-CH AWR finden Sie ebenfalls im RDA-Info-Wiki.<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. [Inetbib vom 09.08.2017].
  5. RDA Toolkit (5 - Juni 2018) (2018) 0.02 
    0.017837493 = product of:
  0.035674985 = sum of:
    0.035674985 = product of:
      0.07134997 = sum of:
        0.07134997 = weight(_text_:x in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07134997 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "gestern Abend wurde die beta Version des neuen RDA-Toolkits<http://beta.rdatoolkit.org/rda.web/> veröffentlicht. Die Veröffentlichung der Beta-Site ist ein wichtiger Meilenstein innerhalb des RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign Project, bedeutet aber nicht den Abschluss des 3R-Projekts. Eine vollständige Beschreibung dessen, was auf der Beta-Site enthalten ist oder nicht, finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/oQNXC>." [Inetbib vom 14.06.2018].
  6. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02 
    0.015334055 = product of:
  0.03066811 = sum of:
    0.03066811 = product of:
      0.06133622 = sum of:
        0.06133622 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133622 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  7. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.02 
    0.0151799405 = product of:
  0.030359881 = sum of:
    0.030359881 = product of:
      0.060719762 = sum of:
        0.060719762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060719762 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
  8. Baier Benninger, P.: Model requirements for the management of electronic records (MoReq2) : Anleitung zur Umsetzung (2011) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  9. Thornton, K: Powerful structure : inspecting infrastructures of information organization in Wikimedia Foundation projects (2016) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=3288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  10. Kara, S.: ¬An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing (2012) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  11. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.013011377 = product of:
  0.026022755 = sum of:
    0.026022755 = product of:
      0.05204551 = sum of:
        0.05204551 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05204551 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  12. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.012267244 = product of:
  0.024534488 = sum of:
    0.024534488 = product of:
      0.049068976 = sum of:
        0.049068976 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049068976 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  13. Zhao, Y.; Ma, F.; Xia, X.: Evaluating the coverage of entities in knowledge graphs behind general web search engines : Poster (2017) 0.01 
    0.011148433 = product of:
  0.022296866 = sum of:
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 3854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593733 = score(doc=3854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 3854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. RDA Toolkit (3) : Oktober 2017 (2017) 0.01 
    0.011148433 = product of:
  0.022296866 = sum of:
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593733 = score(doc=3994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Am 10. Oktober 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits erschienen. Aufgrund des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restruction and Redesign Project) gab es keine inhaltlichen Änderungen am Regelwerkstext. Es wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den D-A-CH vorgenommen, die in der Änderungsdokumentation im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg> aufgelistet sind. Die Gesamtübersicht der D-A-CH nach Kapiteln finden Sie im RDA Toolkit unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen". Wir möchten daran erinnern, dass für die Anwendung von RDA im deutschsprachigen Raum jeweils der deutsche Text maßgeblich ist. Im Juni 2018 wird das RDA Toolkit einen Relaunch erfahren und mit einer neuen Oberfläche erscheinen. Dieser beinhaltet ein Redesign der Toolkit-Oberfläche und die inhaltliche Anpassung des Standards RDA an das Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) sowie die künftige stärkere Ausrichtung auf die aktuellen technischen Möglichkeiten durch den sogenannten 4-Fold-Path. Zunächst wird im Juni 2018 die englische Originalausgabe der RDA in der neuen Form erscheinen. Alle Übersetzungen werden in einer Übergangszeit angepasst. Hierfür wird die alte Version des RDA Toolkit für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung gestellt. Der Stand Oktober 2017 der deutschen Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien bleiben bis zur Anpassung eingefroren. Im geplanten Dezember-Release des RDA Toolkit wird es keine Änderungen für die deutsche Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien geben. [Inetbib vom 11.10.2017]
  15. RDA Toolkit (1) (2017) 0.01 
    0.011148433 = product of:
  0.022296866 = sum of:
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593733 = score(doc=3996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Am 14. Februar 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/development/February2017release> erschienen. Das Release enthält im englischen Text alle Änderungen aus dem Fast-Track-Verfahren RSC/Sec/6<http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Sec-6.pdf>. Ebenso enthalten sind die Updates der LC-PCC PS (Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements) und der MLA Best Practices. Neu aufgenommen wurden die Policy Statements der Library and Archives Canada in Kooperation mit der Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Diese sind sowohl im Register als auch im Text über ein Icon (dunkel violett) mit den Buchstaben LAC/BAC-BAnQ ansteuerbar. Ab sofort ist es möglich sich auch die Policy Statements in einer zweisprachigen Ansicht anzeigen zu lassen, dazu wurde die Funktion Select Language und Dual View in der Symbolliste unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen" eingefügt. Im deutschen Text wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH) eingearbeitet. Die dazugehörige Übersicht (Kurz- bzw. Langversion) finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. Mitte April 2017 wird das nächste Release des RDA Toolkit erscheinen, eingearbeitet werden die verabschiedeten Proposals, die im November 2016 vom RDA Steering Committee (RSC) beschlossen wurden. Die Umsetzung der Änderungen in der deutschen Übersetzung aus den Fast-Track-Dokumenten RSC/Sec/4 und RSC/Sec/5 und RSC/Sec/6 sind für den August 2017 geplant.
  16. Xu, G.; Cao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Li, X.; Feng, Z.: Network security situation awareness based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules for Internet of Things (2017) 0.01 
    0.011148433 = product of:
  0.022296866 = sum of:
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593733 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.01 
    0.011036386 = product of:
  0.022072772 = sum of:
    0.022072772 = product of:
      0.044145543 = sum of:
        0.044145543 = weight(_text_:x in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044145543 = score(doc=1077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23092794 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
    Type
    x
  18. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  19. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  20. Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.15-22

Authors

Types

Themes