Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Aizawa, A.; Kohlhase, M.: Mathematical information retrieval (2021) 0.02
    0.016037485 = product of:
      0.06414994 = sum of:
        0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06414994 = score(doc=667,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present an overview of the NTCIR Math Tasks organized during NTCIR-10, 11, and 12. These tasks are primarily dedicated to techniques for searching mathematical content with formula expressions. In this chapter, we first summarize the task design and introduce test collections generated in the tasks. We also describe the features and main challenges of mathematical information retrieval systems and discuss future perspectives in the field.
    Series
    ¬The Information retrieval series, vol 43
    Source
    Evaluating information retrieval and access tasks. Eds.: Sakai, T., Oard, D., Kando, N. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5554-1_12]
  2. Tramullas, J.; Garrido-Picazo, P.; Sánchez-Casabón, A.I.: Use of Wikipedia categories on information retrieval research : a brief review (2020) 0.01
    0.013746415 = product of:
      0.05498566 = sum of:
        0.05498566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05498566 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia categories, a classification scheme built for organizing and describing Wikpedia articles, are being applied in computer science research. This paper adopts a systematic literature review approach, in order to identify different approaches and uses of Wikipedia categories in information retrieval research. Several types of work are identified, depending on the intrinsic study of the categories structure, or its use as a tool for the processing and analysis of other documentary corpus different to Wikipedia. Information retrieval is identified as one of the major areas of use, in particular its application in the refinement and improvement of search expressions, and the construction of textual corpus. However, the set of available works shows that in many cases research approaches applied and results obtained can be integrated into a comprehensive and inclusive concept of information retrieval.
  3. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.01
    0.013746415 = product of:
      0.05498566 = sum of:
        0.05498566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05498566 = score(doc=1045,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The initial dimensions extracted by latent semantic analysis (LSA) of a document-term matrixhave been shown to mainly display marginal effects, which are irrelevant for informationretrieval. To improve the performance of LSA, usually the elements of the raw document-term matrix are weighted and the weighting exponent of singular values can be adjusted.An alternative information retrieval technique that ignores the marginal effects is correspon-dence analysis (CA). In this paper, the information retrieval performance of LSA and CA isempirically compared. Moreover, it is explored whether the two weightings also improve theperformance of CA. The results for four empirical datasets show that CA always performsbetter than LSA. Weighting the elements of the raw data matrix can improve CA; however,it is data dependent and the improvement is small. Adjusting the singular value weightingexponent often improves the performance of CA; however, the extent of the improvementdepends on the dataset and the number of dimensions. (PDF) Improving information retrieval through correspondence analysis instead of latent semantic analysis.
  4. Jansen, B.; Browne, G.M.: Navigating information spaces : index / mind map / topic map? (2021) 0.01
    0.0091642765 = product of:
      0.036657106 = sum of:
        0.036657106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036657106 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.: Development of domain thesaurus as a set of ontology concepts with use of semantic similarity and elements of combinatorial optimization (2021) 0.01
    0.008018742 = product of:
      0.03207497 = sum of:
        0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03207497 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We consider use of ontological background knowledge in intelligent information systems and analyze directions of their reduction in compliance with specifics of particular user task. Such reduction is aimed at simplification of knowledge processing without loss of significant information. We propose methods of generation of task thesauri based on domain ontology that contain such subset of ontological concepts and relations that can be used in task solving. Combinatorial optimization is used for minimization of task thesaurus. In this approach, semantic similarity estimates are used for determination of concept significance for user task. Some practical examples of optimized thesauri application for semantic retrieval and competence analysis demonstrate efficiency of proposed approach.
  6. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.01
    0.0068732076 = product of:
      0.02749283 = sum of:
        0.02749283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749283 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
  7. Huurdeman, H.C.; Kamps, J.: Designing multistage search systems to support the information seeking process (2020) 0.01
    0.005727673 = product of:
      0.022910692 = sum of:
        0.022910692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022910692 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Due to the advances in information retrieval in the past decades, search engines have become extremely efficient at acquiring useful sources in response to a user's query. However, for more prolonged and complex information seeking tasks, these search engines are not as well suited. During complex information seeking tasks, various stages may occur, which imply varying support needs for users. However, the implications of theoretical information seeking models for concrete search user interfaces (SUI) design are unclear, both at the level of the individual features and of the whole interface. Guidelines and design patterns for concrete SUIs, on the other hand, provide recommendations for feature design, but these are separated from their role in the information seeking process. This chapter addresses the question of how to design SUIs with enhanced support for the macro-level process, first by reviewing previous research. Subsequently, we outline a framework for complex task support, which explicitly connects the temporal development of complex tasks with different levels of support by SUI features. This is followed by a discussion of concrete system examples which include elements of the three dimensions of our framework in an exploratory search and sensemaking context. Moreover, we discuss the connection of navigation with the search-oriented framework. In our final discussion and conclusion, we provide recommendations for designing more holistic SUIs which potentially evolve along with a user's information seeking process.
  8. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.005373285 = product of:
      0.02149314 = sum of:
        0.02149314 = product of:
          0.04298628 = sum of:
            0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04298628 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  9. Frey, J.; Streitmatter, D.; Götz, F.; Hellmann, S.; Arndt, N.: DBpedia Archivo (2020) 0.00
    0.004009371 = product of:
      0.016037485 = sum of:
        0.016037485 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016037485 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We are proud to announce DBpedia Archivo (https://archivo.dbpedia.org) an augmented ontology archive and interface to implement FAIRer ontologies. Each ontology is rated with 4 stars measuring basic FAIR features. We discovered 890 ontologies reaching on average 1.95 out of 4 stars. Many of them have no or unclear licenses and have issues w.r.t. retrieval and parsing.
  10. DeSilva, J.M.; Traniello, J.F.A.; Claxton, A.G.; Fannin, L.D.: When and why did human brains decrease in size? : a new change-point analysis and insights from brain evolution in ants (2021) 0.00
    0.0023028366 = product of:
      0.0092113465 = sum of:
        0.0092113465 = product of:
          0.018422693 = sum of:
            0.018422693 = weight(_text_:22 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018422693 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045324896 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 22 October 2021 [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.742639/full]