Search (381 results, page 20 of 20)
-
Gonzalez, L.: What is FRBR? (2005)
0.00
3.8446303E-4 = product of: 0.0034601672 = sum of: 0.0034601672 = product of: 0.0069203344 = sum of: 0.0069203344 = weight(_text_:web in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0069203344 = score(doc=3401,freq=2.0), product of: 0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of: 3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218) 0.02940506 = queryNorm 0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218) 0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3401) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Content
- National FRBR experiments The larger the bibliographic database, the greater the effect of "FRBR-like" design in reducing the appearance of duplicate records. LC, RLG, and OCLC, all influenced by FRBR, are experimenting with the redesign of their databases. LC's Network Development and MARC Standards Office has posted at its web site the results of some of its investigations into FRBR and MARC, including possible display options for bibliographic information. The design of RLG's public catalog, RedLightGreen, has been described as "FRBR-ish" by Merrilee Proffitt, RLG's program officer. If you try a search for a prolific author or much-published title in RedLightGreen, you'll probably find that the display of search results is much different than what you would expect. OCLC Research has developed a prototype "frbrized" database for fiction, OCLC FictionFinder. Try a title search for a classic title like Romeo and Juliet and observe that OCLC includes, in the initial display of results (described as "works"), a graphic indicator (stars, ranging from one to five). These show in rough terms how many libraries own the work-Romeo and Juliet clearly gets a five. Indicators like this are something resource sharing staff can consider an "ILL quality rating." If you're intrigued by FRBR's possibilities and what they could mean to resource sharing workflow, start talking. Now is the time to connect with colleagues, your local and/or consortial system vendor, RLG, OCLC, and your professional organizations. Have input into how systems develop in the FRBR world."
Authors
- Assem, M. van 8
- Isaac, A. 8
- Schreiber, G. 7
- Mayr, P. 5
- Van de Sompel, H. 5
- Baker, T. 4
- Hyvönen, E. 4
- Panzer, M. 4
- Wielemaker, J. 4
- Wielinga, B. 4
- Zumer, M. 4
- Auer, S. 3
- Bizer, C. 3
- Finin, T. 3
- Koch, T. 3
- Lehmann, J. 3
- Lewandowski, D. 3
- Miles, A. 3
- Mitchell, J.S. 3
- Tudhope, D. 3
- Agrawal, D. 2
- Amin, A. 2
- Arndt, N. 2
- Boer, V. de 2
- Boldi, P. 2
- Brickley, D. 2
- Brin, S. 2
- Cost, R.S. 2
- Cyganiak, R. 2
- Danowski, P. 2
- Davies, J. 2
- Dempsey, L. 2
- Dodge, M. 2
- Doerr, M. 2
- Dolin, R. 2
- Dunsire, G. 2
- El Abbadi, A. 2
- Euzenat, J. 2
- Farazi, F. 2
- Faro, S. 2
- Francesconi, E. 2
- Freire, N. 2
- Frey, J. 2
- Giunchiglia, F. 2
- Gnoli, C. 2
- Gradmann, S. 2
- Götz, F. 2
- Halpin, H. 2
- Hammond, T. 2
- Hannay, T. 2
- Hardman, L. 2
- Harmelen, F. van 2
- Hayes, P.J. 2
- Heery, R. 2
- Hellmann, S. 2
- Hendler, J. 2
- Hildebrand, M. 2
- Hitzler, P. 2
- Hogan, A. 2
- Hollink, L. 2
- Joshi, A. 2
- Kempf, A.O. 2
- Lagoze, C. 2
- Landry, P. 2
- Lavoie, B. 2
- Leskinen, P. 2
- Lossau, N. 2
- Lund, B. 2
- Maltese, V. 2
- Manguinhas, H. 2
- Mayfield, J. 2
- Maynard, D. 2
- McGuinness, D.L. 2
- Mirizzi, R. 2
- Mäkelä, E. 2
- Omelayenko, B. 2
- Ossenbruggen, J. van 2
- Page, L. 2
- Paskin, N. 2
- Patel-Schneider, P.F. 2
- Pearlman, J. 2
- Polleres, A. 2
- Priss, U. 2
- Sandrucci, V. 2
- Schaer, P. 2
- Smith, A.G. 2
- Spink, A. 2
- Stamou, G. 2
- Streitmatter, D. 2
- Summers, E. 2
- Vizine-Goetz, D. 2
- Voß, J. 2
- Weeks, R. 2
- Weibel, S.L. 2
- Young, J.A. 2
- Zaihrayeu, I. 2
- Zeng, M. 2
- Zeng, M.L. 2
- Zhang, J. 2
- Aalberg, T. 1
- More… Less…
Themes
- Wissensrepräsentation 86
- Semantic Web 76
- Semantische Interoperabilität 43
- Suchmaschinen 41
- Internet 30
- Metadaten 26
- Information Gateway 14
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus 11
- Automatisches Klassifizieren 10
- Formalerschließung 10
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval 8
- OPAC 8
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval 8
- Social tagging 8
- Visualisierung 8
- Datenformate 7
- Informetrie 7
- Multilinguale Probleme 7
- Citation indexing 6
- Computerlinguistik 6
- Informationsdienstleistungen 6
- Informationsmittel 6
- Normdateien 6
- Automatisches Indexieren 5
- Auszeichnungssprachen 4
- Folksonomies 4
- Klassifikationssysteme 4
- International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen 3
- Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur 3
- Benutzerstudien 2
- Bibliographie 2
- Data Mining 2
- Elektronisches Publizieren 2
- Information 2
- Katalogfragen allgemein 2
- Literaturübersicht 2
- Retrievalalgorithmen 2
- Thesauri 2
- Universale Facettenklassifikationen 2
- Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken 2
- Beziehungen verbale / systematische Erschließung 1
- Biographische Darstellungen 1
- Formale Begriffsanalyse 1
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur 1
- Retrievalstudien 1
- Suchoberflächen 1
- Suchtaktik 1
- Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge 1
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval 1
- Web-Agenten 1
- More… Less…