Search (167 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.18 
    0.17911148 = sum of:
  0.1371676 = product of:
    0.4115028 = sum of:
      0.4115028 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.4115028 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43931273 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.041943885 = product of:
    0.08388777 = sum of:
      0.08388777 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08388777 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.09 
    0.0915871 = product of:
  0.1831742 = sum of:
    0.1831742 = sum of:
      0.08388777 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08388777 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.099286415 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099286415 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  3. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.09 
    0.08620159 = product of:
  0.17240319 = sum of:
    0.17240319 = sum of:
      0.1162383 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1162383 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.5860202 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056164876 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  4. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.08 
    0.07704693 = product of:
  0.15409386 = sum of:
    0.15409386 = sum of:
      0.08388777 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08388777 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.0702061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0702061 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present a short survey of the literature on indexing and retrieval of mathematical knowledge, with pointers to 72 papers and tentative taxonomies of both retrieval problems and recurring techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  5. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.06 
    0.061637547 = product of:
  0.123275094 = sum of:
    0.123275094 = sum of:
      0.06711022 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06711022 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056164876 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The CD-ROM version of the 20th DDC ed., featuring advanced online search and windowing techniques, full-text indexing, personal notepad, LC subject headings linked to DDC numbers and a database of all DDC changes
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17
  6. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.05486704 = product of:
  0.10973408 = sum of:
    0.10973408 = product of:
      0.32920223 = sum of:
        0.32920223 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32920223 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43931273 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  7. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.05 
    0.053932853 = product of:
  0.107865706 = sum of:
    0.107865706 = sum of:
      0.05872144 = weight(_text_:indexing in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05872144 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049144268 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  8. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.04 
    0.043100797 = product of:
  0.08620159 = sum of:
    0.08620159 = sum of:
      0.05811915 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05811915 = score(doc=1163,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.2930101 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.028082438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028082438 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper addresses the problem of information discovery in large collections of text. For users, one of the key problems in working with such collections is determining where to focus their attention. In selecting documents for examination, users must be able to formulate reasonably precise queries. Queries that are too broad will greatly reduce the efficiency of information discovery efforts by overwhelming the users with peripheral information. In order to formulate efficient queries, a mechanism is needed to automatically alert users regarding potentially interesting information contained within the collection. This paper presents the results of an experiment designed to test one approach to generation of such alerts. The technique of latent semantic indexing (LSI) is used to identify relationships among entities of interest. Entity extraction software is used to pre-process the text of the collection so that the LSI space contains representation vectors for named entities in addition to those for individual terms. In the LSI space, the cosine of the angle between the representation vectors for two entities captures important information regarding the degree of association of those two entities. For appropriate choices of entities, determining the entity pairs with the highest mutual cosine values yields valuable information regarding the contents of the text collection. The test database used for the experiment consists of 150,000 news articles. The proposed approach for alert generation is tested using a counterterrorism analysis example. The approach is shown to have significant potential for aiding users in rapidly focusing on information of potential importance in large text collections. The approach also has value in identifying possible use of aliases.
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
  9. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.04 
    0.038523465 = product of:
  0.07704693 = sum of:
    0.07704693 = sum of:
      0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041943885 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03510305 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051817898 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  10. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.04 
    0.035590567 = product of:
  0.07118113 = sum of:
    0.07118113 = product of:
      0.14236227 = sum of:
        0.14236227 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14236227 = score(doc=3008,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. McIlwaine, I.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities, 2000-2001 (2001) 0.03 
    0.03355511 = product of:
  0.06711022 = sum of:
    0.06711022 = product of:
      0.13422044 = sum of:
        0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13422044 = score(doc=6905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 6905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Gödert, W.: ¬An ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval (2013) 0.03 
    0.03355511 = product of:
  0.06711022 = sum of:
    0.06711022 = product of:
      0.13422044 = sum of:
        0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13422044 = score(doc=1510,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.
  13. Abdelkareem, M.A.A.: In terms of publication index, what indicator is the best for researchers indexing, Google Scholar, Scopus, Clarivate or others? (2018) 0.03 
    0.032826282 = product of:
  0.065652564 = sum of:
    0.065652564 = product of:
      0.13130513 = sum of:
        0.13130513 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13130513 = score(doc=4548,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.6619802 = fieldWeight in 4548, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    I believe that Google Scholar is the most popular academic indexing way for researchers and citations. However, some other indexing institutions may be more professional than Google Scholar but not as popular as Google Scholar. Other indexing websites like Scopus and Clarivate are providing more statistical figures for scholars, institutions or even journals. On account of publication citations, always Google Scholar shows higher citations for a paper than other indexing websites since Google Scholar consider most of the publication platforms so he can easily count the citations. While other databases just consider the citations come from those journals that are already indexed in their database
  14. Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999) 0.03 
    0.02936072 = product of:
  0.05872144 = sum of:
    0.05872144 = product of:
      0.11744288 = sum of:
        0.11744288 = weight(_text_:indexing in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11744288 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  15. Smith, A.G.: Web links as analogues of citations (2004) 0.03 
    0.02936072 = product of:
  0.05872144 = sum of:
    0.05872144 = product of:
      0.11744288 = sum of:
        0.11744288 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11744288 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  16. Turner, J.M.; Mathieu, S.: Audio description text for indexing films (2007) 0.03 
    0.02936072 = product of:
  0.05872144 = sum of:
    0.05872144 = product of:
      0.11744288 = sum of:
        0.11744288 = weight(_text_:indexing in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11744288 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Access to audiovisual materials should be as open and free as access to print-based materials. However, we have not yet achieved such a reality. Methods useful for organising print-based materials do not necessarily work well when applied to audiovisual and multimedia materials. In this project, we studied using audio description text and written descriptions to generate keywords for indexing moving images. We found that such sources are fruitful and helpful. In the second part of the study, we looked at the possibility of automatically translating keywords from audio description text into other languages to use them as indexing. Here again, the results are encouraging.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing
  17. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.03 
    0.027472481 = product of:
  0.054944962 = sum of:
    0.054944962 = product of:
      0.109889925 = sum of:
        0.109889925 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109889925 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  18. Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007) 0.03 
    0.025685279 = product of:
  0.051370557 = sum of:
    0.051370557 = product of:
      0.102741115 = sum of:
        0.102741115 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102741115 = score(doc=4835,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.51797354 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  19. Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007) 0.03 
    0.025427131 = product of:
  0.050854262 = sum of:
    0.050854262 = product of:
      0.101708524 = sum of:
        0.101708524 = weight(_text_:indexing in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101708524 = score(doc=698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  20. McIlwaine, I.C.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities 1999-2000 (2000) 0.03 
    0.025166333 = product of:
  0.050332665 = sum of:
    0.050332665 = product of:
      0.10066533 = sum of:
        0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10066533 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051817898 = queryNorm
            0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 76
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes