Search (49 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"n"
  1. Z39.50-1992: Information retrieval service definition and protocol (1992) 0.00
    0.0031257942 = product of:
      0.015628971 = sum of:
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 8731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=8731,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 8731, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
  2. Z39.19-1991: Proposed American National Standard Guidelines for thesaurus structure, construction and use (1991) 0.00
    0.0031257942 = product of:
      0.015628971 = sum of:
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 4365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=4365,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4365, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
    Imprint
    Gaithersburg, MD : National Information Standards Organization
  3. Panizzi, A.: Rules for the compilation of the catalogue (1841) 0.00
    0.0028832988 = product of:
      0.0144164935 = sum of:
        0.0144164935 = weight(_text_:a in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144164935 = score(doc=4940,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
  4. RDA Toolkit (4) : Dezember 2017 (2017) 0.00
    0.0028041997 = product of:
      0.007010499 = sum of:
        0.00385297 = weight(_text_:a in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00385297 = score(doc=4283,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
        0.003157529 = product of:
          0.006315058 = sum of:
            0.006315058 = weight(_text_:information in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006315058 = score(doc=4283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Am 12. Dezember 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits erschienen. Dabei gab es, aufgrund des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restruction and Redesign Project), keine inhaltlichen Änderungen am RDA-Text. Es wurden ausschließlich die Übersetzungen in finnischer und französischer Sprache, ebenso wie die dazugehörigen Policy statements, aktualisiert. Für den deutschsprachigen Raum wurden in der Übersetzung zwei Beziehungskennzeichnungen geändert: Im Anhang I.2.2 wurde die Änderung von "Sponsor" zu "Träger" wieder rückgängig gemacht. In Anhang K.2.3 wurde "Sponsor" zu "Person als Sponsor" geändert. Außerdem wurde die Übersetzung der Anwendungsrichtlinien (D-A-CH AWR) ins Französische aktualisiert. Dies ist das vorletzte Release vor dem Rollout des neuen Toolkits. Das letzte Release im Januar/Februar 2018 wird die norwegische Übersetzung enthalten. Im Juni 2018 wird das RDA Toolkit ein Relaunch erfahren und mit einer neuen Oberfläche erscheinen. Dieser beinhaltet ein Redesign der Toolkit-Oberfläche und die inhaltliche Anpassung des Standards RDA an das Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) sowie die künftige stärkere Ausrichtung auf die aktuellen technischen Möglichkeiten. Zunächst wird im Juni 2018 die englische Originalausgabe der RDA in der neuen Form erscheinen. Alle Übersetzungen werden in einer Übergangszeit angepasst. Hierfür wird die alte Version des RDA Toolkit für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung gestellt. Der Stand Dezember 2017 der deutschen Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien bleiben bis zur Anpassung eingefroren. Nähere Information zum Rollout finden Sie unter dem folgenden Link<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/3Rproject/SR3>. [Inetbib vom 13.12.2017]
  5. ISO/IEC FCD 13250: Topic maps. Information technology (1999) 0.00
    0.0025260232 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  6. IS0 5127: Information and documentation : vocabulary (2001) 0.00
    0.0025260232 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. ISO 8824: Information processing systems - open systems interconnection : specifications for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (1987) 0.00
    0.0025260232 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. ISO 6862:1996(E): Mathematical coded character set for bibliographic information exchange (1996) 0.00
    0.0025260232 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 5380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=5380,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5380, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Codes for the representation of languages for information interchange (2001) 0.00
    0.0022327104 = product of:
      0.011163551 = sum of:
        0.011163551 = product of:
          0.022327103 = sum of:
            0.022327103 = weight(_text_:information in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022327103 = score(doc=3927,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
  10. Z39.4-1984: American national standard for library and information sciences and related publishing practices : Basic criteria for indexes (1984) 0.00
    0.0022102704 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 8733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=8733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. ISO 8825: Information processing systems - open systems interconnection : specifications of basic encoding rules for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (1987) 0.00
    0.0022102704 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. ISO 999: Index of a publication (1975) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004) 0.00
    0.002002062 = product of:
      0.0100103095 = sum of:
        0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100103095 = score(doc=4683,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
  14. SKOS Core Guide (2005) 0.00
    0.002002062 = product of:
      0.0100103095 = sum of:
        0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100103095 = score(doc=4689,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    SKOS Core provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes embedded in glossaries and terminologies. The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF), that can be used to express a concept scheme as an RDF graph. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data, enabling data sources to be distributed across the web, but still be meaningfully composed and integrated. This document is a guide using the SKOS Core Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts. This edition of the SKOS Core Guide [SKOS Core Guide] is a W3C Public Working Draft. It is the authoritative guide to recommended usage of the SKOS Core Vocabulary at the time of publication.
    Editor
    Miles, A. u. D. Brickley
  15. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=4684,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
  16. Z39.53-199X: Language codes (1993) 0.00
    0.0018945175 = product of:
      0.009472587 = sum of:
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 8038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=8038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 8038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This draft standard defines almost 400 separate three-character alphabetic codes to indicate language in the interchange of information. The list is based on the US MARC list, the revision updates the first one of 1987
  17. Z39.67-1993: Computer software description (1993) 0.00
    0.0018945175 = product of:
      0.009472587 = sum of:
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 8732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=8732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 8732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
  18. Hori, M.; Euzenat, J.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL Web Ontology Language XML Presentation Syntax (2003) 0.00
    0.0018875621 = product of:
      0.009437811 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 4680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=4680,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4680, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies XML presentation syntax for OWL, which is defined as a dialect similar to OWL Abstract Syntax [OWL Semantics]. It is not intended to be a normative specification. Instead, it represents a suggestion of one possible XML presentation syntax for OWL.
  19. OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004) 0.00
    0.0018875621 = product of:
      0.009437811 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=4686,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
  20. Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016) 0.00
    0.0018276243 = product of:
      0.009138121 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=2881,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR Review Group worked actively towards a consolidated model starting in 2010, in a series of working meetings held in conjunction with IFLA conferences and at an additional mid-year meeting in April 2012 during which the user task consolidation was first drafted. In 2013 in Singapore, the FRBR Review Group constituted a Consolidation Editorial Group (CEG) to focus on the detailed reassessment of attribute s and relationships, and the drafting of this model document. The CEG (at times with other FRBR Review Group members or invited experts) held five multi-day meetings, as well as discussing progress in detail with the FRBR Review Group as a whole during a working meeting in 2014 in Lyon and another in 2015 in Cape Town.