Search (49 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"p"
  1. Lund, B.D.: ¬A brief review of ChatGPT : its value and the underlying GPT technology (2023) 0.00 
    1.2472004E-4 = product of:
  0.003741601 = sum of:
    0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003741601 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Abstract
    In this review paper, ChatGPT, a public tool developed by OpenAI that utilizes GPT technology to fulfill a range of text-based requests is examined. ChatGPT is a sophisticated chatbot capable of understanding and interpreting user requests, generating appropriate responses in nearly natural human language, and completing advanced tasks such as writing thank you letters and addressing productivity issues. The details of how ChatGPT works, as well as the potential impacts of this technology on various industries, are discussed. The concept of Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT), the language model on which ChatGPT is based, is also explored, as well as the process of unsupervised pretraining and supervised fine-tuning that is used to refine the GPT algorithm. A letter written by ChatGPT to a colleague from Iran is presented as an example of the chatbot's capabilities.
  2. Lund, B.D.: ¬A chat with ChatGPT : how will AI impact scholarly publishing? (2022) 0.00 
    1.1758717E-4 = product of:
  0.003527615 = sum of:
    0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003527615 = score(doc=850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=850)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Abstract
    This is a short project that serves as an inspiration for a forthcoming paper, which will explore the technical side of ChatGPT and the ethical issues it presents for academic researchers, which will result in a peer-reviewed publication. This demonstrates that capacities of ChatGPT as a "chatbot" that is far more advanced than many alternatives available today and may even be able to be used to draft entire academic manuscripts for researchers. ChatGPT is available via https://chat.openai.com/chat.
  3. Béguet, B.; Jouguelet, S.; Naudi, M.: French translation of Dewey Decimal Classification : Assessment and perspectives from the scientific contribution by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France (1998) 0.00 
    1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 3480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=3480,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3480, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3480)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
  4. Adler, E.: Multilingual and multiscript access : the case of Israel (2000) 0.00 
    1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Series
    035-130-E+F+G+S
  5. Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature for religion (2000) 0.00 
    1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Series
    034-130-E+G+S
  6. McIlwaine, I.C.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities 1999-2000 (2000) 0.00 
    1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Series
    036-96-E+F+G+S
  7. Yitzhaki, M.: ¬A draft version of a consolidated thesaurus for the rapidly growing field of alternative medicine (2000) 0.00 
    1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Series
    049-130-E+F+G+S
  8. Zhai, X.: ChatGPT user experience: : implications for education (2022) 0.00 
    7.349199E-5 = product of:
  0.0022047595 = sum of:
    0.0022047595 = weight(_text_:in in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0022047595 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Abstract
    ChatGPT, a general-purpose conversation chatbot released on November 30, 2022, by OpenAI, is expected to impact every aspect of society. However, the potential impacts of this NLP tool on education remain unknown. Such impact can be enormous as the capacity of ChatGPT may drive changes to educational learning goals, learning activities, and assessment and evaluation practices. This study was conducted by piloting ChatGPT to write an academic paper, titled Artificial Intelligence for Education (see Appendix A). The piloting result suggests that ChatGPT is able to help researchers write a paper that is coherent, (partially) accurate, informative, and systematic. The writing is extremely efficient (2-3 hours) and involves very limited professional knowledge from the author. Drawing upon the user experience, I reflect on the potential impacts of ChatGPT, as well as similar AI tools, on education. The paper concludes by suggesting adjusting learning goals-students should be able to use AI tools to conduct subject-domain tasks and education should focus on improving students' creativity and critical thinking rather than general skills. To accomplish the learning goals, researchers should design AI-involved learning tasks to engage students in solving real-world problems. ChatGPT also raises concerns that students may outsource assessment tasks. This paper concludes that new formats of assessments are needed to focus on creativity and critical thinking that AI cannot substitute.
  9. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the médiathèque of the cité des sciences et de l'industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.00 
    6.5731954E-5 = product of:
  0.0019719584 = sum of:
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Pages
    9 S

Authors

Years

Types

Themes