-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Lexical choice (1996)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Scientific discovery (1997)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
New tools for human translators (1997)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 25. 3.2003 13:22:23
-
Subject gateways (2000)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:43:01
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.005062908 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = product of:
0.07088071 = sum of:
0.07088071 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088071 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Lee, W.G.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Nishioka, A.; Hatada, K.; Ohbo, N.; Fujiwara, S.: ¬A dynamic thesaurus for intelligent access to research databases (1989)
0.00
0.0048387814 = product of:
0.03387147 = sum of:
0.03387147 = product of:
0.06774294 = sum of:
0.06774294 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774294 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989)
0.00
0.0048387814 = product of:
0.03387147 = sum of:
0.03387147 = product of:
0.06774294 = sum of:
0.06774294 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774294 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Time, quantum and information (2003)
0.00
0.004838216 = product of:
0.033867512 = sum of:
0.033867512 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033867512 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.1582201 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Während sich die Beiträge zur Urtheorie an Spezialisten wenden, finden sich zu anderen Arbeitsgebieten von Weizsäckers eher allgemeinverständliche Darstellungen: Astro- und Kernphysik mit den thermonuklearen Prozessen in Sternen und der Entstehung der Planetensysteme sowie die Philosophie der Naturwissenschaft und der Zeit - alles in der für solche Festschriften typischen bunten Mischung. Hervorgehoben sei die Darstellung des Hamburger Friedensforschers Götz Neuneck zur deutschen Atomforschung während des Zweiten Weltkriegs und zu den nachfolgenden Bemühungen internationaler Wissenschaftler, die Institution des Kriegs nach dem Bau der Atombombe abzuschaffen. In beiden hat von Weizsäcker eine herausragende Rolle gespielt. Ein wichtiges Thema des Buchs sind die Grundlagen der Quantentheorie. Mit der Charakterisierung von Objekten durch Information ist die Urtheorie eine radikale Weiterführung der »Kopenhagener Deutung«, jener orthodoxen, aber von vielen Physikern nur mangels einer überzeugenden Alternative akzeptierten Interpretation der Quantentheorie. Ein seit deren Anfängen andauernder Streit geht darum, ob die Wellenfunktion, die Wahrscheinlichkeiten für Messergebnisse vorhersagt, gemäß der Kopenhagener Deutung das mögliche Wissen eines Beobachters darstellt oder eine davon unabhängige Realität beschreibt. Wie lebendig diese Debatte ist, machen mehrere Beiträge in diesem Buch deutlich. Hans Primas und Harald Atmanspacher lösen den Widerspruch nach dem Muster des Teilchen-Welle-Dualismus auf Beide Positionen beruhen auf unterschiedlichen Auffassungen der Wirklichkeit, die beide für eine Beschreibung der Natur je nach der zu Grunde liegenden Fragestellung notwendig seien. Claus Kiefer erläutert das Phänomen der »Dekohärenz«, wonach der quantenmechanische Messprozess in neuem Licht erscheine, wenn auch die Kopplung des Messgeräts an seine Umgebung berücksichtigt werde, denn unrealistische Überlagerungszustände im Messprozess wie die berühmte sowohl tote als auch lebendige »Schrödinger'sche Katze« seien bereits durch die Quantenmechanik selbst ausgeschlossen. Spätestens wenn der Kosmos als Ganzes betrachtet werde, komme die Kopenhagener Deutung an ihr Ende, denn hier gebe es keinen Beobachter mehr, für den die quantentheoretischen Möglichkeiten zu Fakten werden könnten.
-
Information systems and the economies of innovation (2003)
0.00
0.004838216 = product of:
0.033867512 = sum of:
0.033867512 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033867512 = score(doc=3586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.1582201 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.8, S.889-890 (J. Warner): "This work is a collection of papers, reflective and theoretical, rather than primarily empirical, from scholars in information systems and economies, with discursive rather than formal modes of argument and presentation. The discipline of information systems (IS) is understood to have developed as codified knowledge about appropriate procedures for the development of customized information and communication technology (ICT) applications. The editors recognize that, with the displacement of customized applications by purchased packages, IS lost its main utility as a prescription for professional practice in the 1990s. The need for the scholarly community to establish its continuing value and to survive might be orte motivation for the increasing resort to theory. A difference in perspective between IS and economies is acknowledged: economiet take an outside-in approach to the results of innovation while IS focuses an the process of innovation. Recognition does not extend to synthesis, and a dynamic by which the process of Innovation both generates and is compelled by the resulting sociotechnical environment is not isolated. The literature of information science is not cited-other writers have noted the analogies between the subjects and disjunctions between the disciplines of IS and information science (Ellis, Allen, & Wilson, 1999)-but interdisciplinary dialogue is advocated. For information science readers, the interest of the work lies in the analogies between topics treated and the emerging theoretical reflection an them. Theory seems to have emerged primarily as a response to empirical difficulties, particularly contradictions between expectations and reality, and can reproduce the divides which motivated it. Empirical generalizations are not distinguished from the motivating forces which created the phenomena covered by those generalizations. For instance, the social constructivist perspective which argues that impact of technology is a matter of interpretation by human actors according to their social conditions, and which acknowledges the interpretive flexibility of a technology in use, is introduced, but technology is not fully recognized as a radical human construction, "organs of the human brain, created by the human hand" (Marx, 1973, p. 706; Warner, 2004), and the notion of impact is retained. The productivity paradox, understood as the weak correlation between investment in ICT and commercial success, forms a recurrent concern. A simple response might that the commercial value of a technology lies in the way it is used. More sophisticatedly the paradox could be regarded as an artifact of the apparent rigor and closeness, particularly temporal closeness, of studies and could be reinterpreted as a productivity effect, corresponding to a transition cost. The conclusion does not recall the distinction between invention, innovation, and diffusion, promised in the preface, and invention tends to be treated as if it were exogenous. The most interesting insights emerge from accounts of cited papers, particularly Ciborra's view of technology as being assimilated to the social by the device of hospitality and Orlikowski's reflections an technology.
-
Progress in visual information access and retrieval (1999)
0.00
0.004838216 = product of:
0.033867512 = sum of:
0.033867512 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033867512 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.1582201 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Since 1988, two issues of Library Trends have been devoted to various aspects of image and multimedia information retrieval. In each issue, the editors call for a synergy across the disciplines that develop image retrieval systems and those that utilize these systems. Stam and Giral, in the 1988 issue of Library Trends titled "Linking Art Objects and Art Information," emphasize the need for a thorough understanding of the visual information-seeking behaviors of image database users. Writing in a 1990 issue of Library Trends devoted to graphical information retrieval, Mark Rorvig takes up the fundamental issue that "what can be listed cannot always be found" and uses that statement as a framework for examining progress in intellectual access to visual information. In the ensuing decade, several critical events have unfolded that have brought about some of the needed collaboration across disciplines and have enhanced the potential for advancements in the area of visual information retrieval. First, the field of computer vision has grown exponentially within the past decade, producing tools that enable the retrieval of visual information, especially for objects with no accompanying structural, administrative, or descriptive text information. Second, the Internet, more specifically the Web, has become a common channel for the transmission of graphical information, thus moving visual information retrieval rapidly from stand-alone workstations and databases into a networked environment. Third, the use of the Web to provide access to the search and retrieval mechanisms for visual and other forms of information has spawned the development of emerging standards for metadata about these objects as well as the creation of commonly employed methods to achieve interoperability across the searching of visual, textual, and other multimedia repositories. Practicality has begun to dictate that the indexing of huge collections of images by hand is a task that is both labor intensive and expensive-in many cases more than can be afforded to provide some method of intellectual access to digital image collections. In the world of text retrieval, text "speaks for itself" whereas image analysis requires a combination of high-level concept creation as well as the processing and interpretation of inherent visual features. In the area of intellectual access to visual information, the interplay between human and machine image indexing methods has begun to influence the development of visual information retrieval systems. Research and application by the visual information retrieval (VIR) community suggests that the most fruitful approaches to VIR involve analysis of the type of information being sought, the domain in which it will be used, and systematic testing to identify optimal retrieval methods.
-
¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge (2007)
0.00
0.004838216 = product of:
0.033867512 = sum of:
0.033867512 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033867512 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.1582201 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Interdisciplinarity draws its strength from the ontological view that reality may be explained from various different angles that permit interpretation of phenomena in a more complete way without becoming mere eclecticism. From an epistemological point of view, interdisciplinarity attempts to unify the field of action of the disciplines that study social facts and phenomena. It has no intention of achieving a priori integration of the paradigms of knowledge. Rather, its efforts are aimed at the enrichment and rational exchanging of the methods of various disciplines, to some extent independently of the categories specific to each science, in order to improve study of reality. Transdisciplinarity, for its part, simultaneously covers what lies between disciplines, cuts across various disciplines or goes beyond any discipline. Its aim is to understand the present world, one essential feature of which is the unity of knowledge. Transdisciplinary research is in no way antagonistic to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, but rather is complementary to it.
-
Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
-
Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
-
Advances in library automation and networking (1995)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.60 (C. Hurt)
-
Sixth International World Wide Web Conference (1997)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 2053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=2053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 15. 6.1996 18:06:22
-
Grey exploitations in the 21st century GL'95 : Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Grey Literature, Amsterdam, Washington, DC, 2-3 November 1995 (1996)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 24. 7.1996 20:50:22
-
Expert systems in law (1994)
0.00
0.0043396354 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = product of:
0.06075489 = sum of:
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 3. 8.1996 10:55:22
